Cargando…
Comparative Evaluation of Pellet Cushioning Agents by Various Imaging Techniques and Dissolution Studies
Most of the commercially available pharmaceutical products for oral administration route are marketed in the tablet dosage forms. However, compression of multiparticulate systems is a challenge for the pharmaceutical research and industry, especially if the individual unit is a coated particle, as t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Springer International Publishing
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33377174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12249-020-01902-x |
_version_ | 1783629817488343040 |
---|---|
author | Sántha, Konrád Kállai-Szabó, Nikolett Fülöp, Viktor Jakab, Géza Gordon, Péter Kállai-Szabó, Barnabás Balogh, Emese Antal, István |
author_facet | Sántha, Konrád Kállai-Szabó, Nikolett Fülöp, Viktor Jakab, Géza Gordon, Péter Kállai-Szabó, Barnabás Balogh, Emese Antal, István |
author_sort | Sántha, Konrád |
collection | PubMed |
description | Most of the commercially available pharmaceutical products for oral administration route are marketed in the tablet dosage forms. However, compression of multiparticulate systems is a challenge for the pharmaceutical research and industry, especially if the individual unit is a coated particle, as the release of the active ingredient depends on the integrity of the coating. In the present study, polymer-coated pellets tableted with different types of excipients (powder, granules, pellets) then were investigated by various tablet-destructive (microscopic) and tablet non-destructive (microfocus X-ray; microCT) imaging methods. The information obtained from the independent evaluation of the in vitro drug release profiles model is confirmed by the results obtained by image analysis, regardless of whether X-ray or stereomicroscopic images of the coated, tableted pellets were used for image analysis. The results of this study show that the novel easy-to-use, fast, and non-destructive MFX method is a good alternative to the already used microscopic image analysis methods regarding the characterization of particulates, compressed into tablets. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7772162 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Springer International Publishing |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77721622021-01-04 Comparative Evaluation of Pellet Cushioning Agents by Various Imaging Techniques and Dissolution Studies Sántha, Konrád Kállai-Szabó, Nikolett Fülöp, Viktor Jakab, Géza Gordon, Péter Kállai-Szabó, Barnabás Balogh, Emese Antal, István AAPS PharmSciTech Research Article Most of the commercially available pharmaceutical products for oral administration route are marketed in the tablet dosage forms. However, compression of multiparticulate systems is a challenge for the pharmaceutical research and industry, especially if the individual unit is a coated particle, as the release of the active ingredient depends on the integrity of the coating. In the present study, polymer-coated pellets tableted with different types of excipients (powder, granules, pellets) then were investigated by various tablet-destructive (microscopic) and tablet non-destructive (microfocus X-ray; microCT) imaging methods. The information obtained from the independent evaluation of the in vitro drug release profiles model is confirmed by the results obtained by image analysis, regardless of whether X-ray or stereomicroscopic images of the coated, tableted pellets were used for image analysis. The results of this study show that the novel easy-to-use, fast, and non-destructive MFX method is a good alternative to the already used microscopic image analysis methods regarding the characterization of particulates, compressed into tablets. Springer International Publishing 2020-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7772162/ /pubmed/33377174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12249-020-01902-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. |
spellingShingle | Research Article Sántha, Konrád Kállai-Szabó, Nikolett Fülöp, Viktor Jakab, Géza Gordon, Péter Kállai-Szabó, Barnabás Balogh, Emese Antal, István Comparative Evaluation of Pellet Cushioning Agents by Various Imaging Techniques and Dissolution Studies |
title | Comparative Evaluation of Pellet Cushioning Agents by Various Imaging Techniques and Dissolution Studies |
title_full | Comparative Evaluation of Pellet Cushioning Agents by Various Imaging Techniques and Dissolution Studies |
title_fullStr | Comparative Evaluation of Pellet Cushioning Agents by Various Imaging Techniques and Dissolution Studies |
title_full_unstemmed | Comparative Evaluation of Pellet Cushioning Agents by Various Imaging Techniques and Dissolution Studies |
title_short | Comparative Evaluation of Pellet Cushioning Agents by Various Imaging Techniques and Dissolution Studies |
title_sort | comparative evaluation of pellet cushioning agents by various imaging techniques and dissolution studies |
topic | Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772162/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33377174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12249-020-01902-x |
work_keys_str_mv | AT santhakonrad comparativeevaluationofpelletcushioningagentsbyvariousimagingtechniquesanddissolutionstudies AT kallaiszabonikolett comparativeevaluationofpelletcushioningagentsbyvariousimagingtechniquesanddissolutionstudies AT fulopviktor comparativeevaluationofpelletcushioningagentsbyvariousimagingtechniquesanddissolutionstudies AT jakabgeza comparativeevaluationofpelletcushioningagentsbyvariousimagingtechniquesanddissolutionstudies AT gordonpeter comparativeevaluationofpelletcushioningagentsbyvariousimagingtechniquesanddissolutionstudies AT kallaiszabobarnabas comparativeevaluationofpelletcushioningagentsbyvariousimagingtechniquesanddissolutionstudies AT baloghemese comparativeevaluationofpelletcushioningagentsbyvariousimagingtechniquesanddissolutionstudies AT antalistvan comparativeevaluationofpelletcushioningagentsbyvariousimagingtechniquesanddissolutionstudies |