Cargando…

Comparative Evaluation of Pellet Cushioning Agents by Various Imaging Techniques and Dissolution Studies

Most of the commercially available pharmaceutical products for oral administration route are marketed in the tablet dosage forms. However, compression of multiparticulate systems is a challenge for the pharmaceutical research and industry, especially if the individual unit is a coated particle, as t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sántha, Konrád, Kállai-Szabó, Nikolett, Fülöp, Viktor, Jakab, Géza, Gordon, Péter, Kállai-Szabó, Barnabás, Balogh, Emese, Antal, István
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33377174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12249-020-01902-x
_version_ 1783629817488343040
author Sántha, Konrád
Kállai-Szabó, Nikolett
Fülöp, Viktor
Jakab, Géza
Gordon, Péter
Kállai-Szabó, Barnabás
Balogh, Emese
Antal, István
author_facet Sántha, Konrád
Kállai-Szabó, Nikolett
Fülöp, Viktor
Jakab, Géza
Gordon, Péter
Kállai-Szabó, Barnabás
Balogh, Emese
Antal, István
author_sort Sántha, Konrád
collection PubMed
description Most of the commercially available pharmaceutical products for oral administration route are marketed in the tablet dosage forms. However, compression of multiparticulate systems is a challenge for the pharmaceutical research and industry, especially if the individual unit is a coated particle, as the release of the active ingredient depends on the integrity of the coating. In the present study, polymer-coated pellets tableted with different types of excipients (powder, granules, pellets) then were investigated by various tablet-destructive (microscopic) and tablet non-destructive (microfocus X-ray; microCT) imaging methods. The information obtained from the independent evaluation of the in vitro drug release profiles model is confirmed by the results obtained by image analysis, regardless of whether X-ray or stereomicroscopic images of the coated, tableted pellets were used for image analysis. The results of this study show that the novel easy-to-use, fast, and non-destructive MFX method is a good alternative to the already used microscopic image analysis methods regarding the characterization of particulates, compressed into tablets.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7772162
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77721622021-01-04 Comparative Evaluation of Pellet Cushioning Agents by Various Imaging Techniques and Dissolution Studies Sántha, Konrád Kállai-Szabó, Nikolett Fülöp, Viktor Jakab, Géza Gordon, Péter Kállai-Szabó, Barnabás Balogh, Emese Antal, István AAPS PharmSciTech Research Article Most of the commercially available pharmaceutical products for oral administration route are marketed in the tablet dosage forms. However, compression of multiparticulate systems is a challenge for the pharmaceutical research and industry, especially if the individual unit is a coated particle, as the release of the active ingredient depends on the integrity of the coating. In the present study, polymer-coated pellets tableted with different types of excipients (powder, granules, pellets) then were investigated by various tablet-destructive (microscopic) and tablet non-destructive (microfocus X-ray; microCT) imaging methods. The information obtained from the independent evaluation of the in vitro drug release profiles model is confirmed by the results obtained by image analysis, regardless of whether X-ray or stereomicroscopic images of the coated, tableted pellets were used for image analysis. The results of this study show that the novel easy-to-use, fast, and non-destructive MFX method is a good alternative to the already used microscopic image analysis methods regarding the characterization of particulates, compressed into tablets. Springer International Publishing 2020-12-29 /pmc/articles/PMC7772162/ /pubmed/33377174 http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12249-020-01902-x Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Research Article
Sántha, Konrád
Kállai-Szabó, Nikolett
Fülöp, Viktor
Jakab, Géza
Gordon, Péter
Kállai-Szabó, Barnabás
Balogh, Emese
Antal, István
Comparative Evaluation of Pellet Cushioning Agents by Various Imaging Techniques and Dissolution Studies
title Comparative Evaluation of Pellet Cushioning Agents by Various Imaging Techniques and Dissolution Studies
title_full Comparative Evaluation of Pellet Cushioning Agents by Various Imaging Techniques and Dissolution Studies
title_fullStr Comparative Evaluation of Pellet Cushioning Agents by Various Imaging Techniques and Dissolution Studies
title_full_unstemmed Comparative Evaluation of Pellet Cushioning Agents by Various Imaging Techniques and Dissolution Studies
title_short Comparative Evaluation of Pellet Cushioning Agents by Various Imaging Techniques and Dissolution Studies
title_sort comparative evaluation of pellet cushioning agents by various imaging techniques and dissolution studies
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772162/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33377174
http://dx.doi.org/10.1208/s12249-020-01902-x
work_keys_str_mv AT santhakonrad comparativeevaluationofpelletcushioningagentsbyvariousimagingtechniquesanddissolutionstudies
AT kallaiszabonikolett comparativeevaluationofpelletcushioningagentsbyvariousimagingtechniquesanddissolutionstudies
AT fulopviktor comparativeevaluationofpelletcushioningagentsbyvariousimagingtechniquesanddissolutionstudies
AT jakabgeza comparativeevaluationofpelletcushioningagentsbyvariousimagingtechniquesanddissolutionstudies
AT gordonpeter comparativeevaluationofpelletcushioningagentsbyvariousimagingtechniquesanddissolutionstudies
AT kallaiszabobarnabas comparativeevaluationofpelletcushioningagentsbyvariousimagingtechniquesanddissolutionstudies
AT baloghemese comparativeevaluationofpelletcushioningagentsbyvariousimagingtechniquesanddissolutionstudies
AT antalistvan comparativeevaluationofpelletcushioningagentsbyvariousimagingtechniquesanddissolutionstudies