Cargando…

Test–Retest Reliability of Magnetoencephalography Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Schizophrenia

The reliability of magnetoencephalography (MEG) resting-state functional connectivity in schizophrenia (SZ) is unknown as previous research has focused on healthy controls (HC). Here, we examined reliability in 26 participants (13-SZ, 13-HC). Eyes opened and eyes closed resting-state data were colle...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Candelaria-Cook, Felicha T., Stephen, Julia M.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391043
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.551952
_version_ 1783629851222081536
author Candelaria-Cook, Felicha T.
Stephen, Julia M.
author_facet Candelaria-Cook, Felicha T.
Stephen, Julia M.
author_sort Candelaria-Cook, Felicha T.
collection PubMed
description The reliability of magnetoencephalography (MEG) resting-state functional connectivity in schizophrenia (SZ) is unknown as previous research has focused on healthy controls (HC). Here, we examined reliability in 26 participants (13-SZ, 13-HC). Eyes opened and eyes closed resting-state data were collected on 4 separate occasions during 2 visits, 1 week apart. For source modeling, we used minimum norm software to apply dynamic statistical parametric mapping. Source analyses compared the following functional connectivity metrics from each data run: coherence (coh), imaginary coherence (imcoh), pairwise phase consistency (ppc), phase-locking value (plv), phase lag index (pli), weighted phase lag index (wpli), and weighted phase lag index debiased (wpli2). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for whole brain, network, and network pair averages. For reliability, ICCs above 0.75 = excellent, above 0.60 = good, above 0.40 = fair, and below 0.40 = poor reliability. We found the reliability of these metrics varied greatly depending on frequency band, network, network pair, and participant group examined. Broadband (1–58 Hz) whole brain averages in both HC and SZ showed excellent reliability for wpli2, and good to fair reliability for ppc, plv, and coh. Broadband network averages showed excellent to good reliability across 1 hour and 1 week for coh, imcoh, ppc, plv, wpli within default mode, cognitive control, and visual networks in HC, while the same metrics had excellent to fair reliability in SZ. Regional network pair averages showed good to fair reliability for coh, ppc, plv within default mode, cognitive control and visual network pairs in HC and SZ. In general, HC had higher reliability compared to SZ, and the default mode, cognitive control, and visual networks had higher reliability compared to somatosensory and auditory networks. Similar reliability levels occurred for both eyes opened and eyes closed resting-states for most metrics. The functional connectivity metrics of coh, ppc, and plv performed best across 1 hour and 1 week in HC and SZ. We also found that SZ had reduced coh, plv, and ppc in the dmn average and pair values indicating dysconnectivity in SZ. These findings encourage collecting both eyes opened and eyes closed resting-state MEG, while demonstrating that clinical populations may differ in reliability.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7772354
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77723542020-12-31 Test–Retest Reliability of Magnetoencephalography Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Schizophrenia Candelaria-Cook, Felicha T. Stephen, Julia M. Front Psychiatry Psychiatry The reliability of magnetoencephalography (MEG) resting-state functional connectivity in schizophrenia (SZ) is unknown as previous research has focused on healthy controls (HC). Here, we examined reliability in 26 participants (13-SZ, 13-HC). Eyes opened and eyes closed resting-state data were collected on 4 separate occasions during 2 visits, 1 week apart. For source modeling, we used minimum norm software to apply dynamic statistical parametric mapping. Source analyses compared the following functional connectivity metrics from each data run: coherence (coh), imaginary coherence (imcoh), pairwise phase consistency (ppc), phase-locking value (plv), phase lag index (pli), weighted phase lag index (wpli), and weighted phase lag index debiased (wpli2). Intraclass correlation coefficients (ICCs) were calculated for whole brain, network, and network pair averages. For reliability, ICCs above 0.75 = excellent, above 0.60 = good, above 0.40 = fair, and below 0.40 = poor reliability. We found the reliability of these metrics varied greatly depending on frequency band, network, network pair, and participant group examined. Broadband (1–58 Hz) whole brain averages in both HC and SZ showed excellent reliability for wpli2, and good to fair reliability for ppc, plv, and coh. Broadband network averages showed excellent to good reliability across 1 hour and 1 week for coh, imcoh, ppc, plv, wpli within default mode, cognitive control, and visual networks in HC, while the same metrics had excellent to fair reliability in SZ. Regional network pair averages showed good to fair reliability for coh, ppc, plv within default mode, cognitive control and visual network pairs in HC and SZ. In general, HC had higher reliability compared to SZ, and the default mode, cognitive control, and visual networks had higher reliability compared to somatosensory and auditory networks. Similar reliability levels occurred for both eyes opened and eyes closed resting-states for most metrics. The functional connectivity metrics of coh, ppc, and plv performed best across 1 hour and 1 week in HC and SZ. We also found that SZ had reduced coh, plv, and ppc in the dmn average and pair values indicating dysconnectivity in SZ. These findings encourage collecting both eyes opened and eyes closed resting-state MEG, while demonstrating that clinical populations may differ in reliability. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7772354/ /pubmed/33391043 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.551952 Text en Copyright © 2020 Candelaria-Cook and Stephen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychiatry
Candelaria-Cook, Felicha T.
Stephen, Julia M.
Test–Retest Reliability of Magnetoencephalography Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Schizophrenia
title Test–Retest Reliability of Magnetoencephalography Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Schizophrenia
title_full Test–Retest Reliability of Magnetoencephalography Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Schizophrenia
title_fullStr Test–Retest Reliability of Magnetoencephalography Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Schizophrenia
title_full_unstemmed Test–Retest Reliability of Magnetoencephalography Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Schizophrenia
title_short Test–Retest Reliability of Magnetoencephalography Resting-State Functional Connectivity in Schizophrenia
title_sort test–retest reliability of magnetoencephalography resting-state functional connectivity in schizophrenia
topic Psychiatry
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772354/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391043
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2020.551952
work_keys_str_mv AT candelariacookfelichat testretestreliabilityofmagnetoencephalographyrestingstatefunctionalconnectivityinschizophrenia
AT stephenjuliam testretestreliabilityofmagnetoencephalographyrestingstatefunctionalconnectivityinschizophrenia