Cargando…

Practice Matters: Pro-environmental Motivations and Diet-Related Impact Vary With Meditation Experience

Mindfulness has emerged as a potential motivator for sustainable lifestyles, yet few studies provide insight into the relationship between mindfulness practice levels and individual engagement in pro-environmental behaviors. We also lack information about the significance of meditators’ behavioral d...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Thiermann, Ute B., Sheate, William R., Vercammen, Ans
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391103
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584353
_version_ 1783629862750126080
author Thiermann, Ute B.
Sheate, William R.
Vercammen, Ans
author_facet Thiermann, Ute B.
Sheate, William R.
Vercammen, Ans
author_sort Thiermann, Ute B.
collection PubMed
description Mindfulness has emerged as a potential motivator for sustainable lifestyles, yet few studies provide insight into the relationship between mindfulness practice levels and individual engagement in pro-environmental behaviors. We also lack information about the significance of meditators’ behavioral differences in terms of their measurable environmental impact and the motivational processes underlying these differences in pro-environmental performance. We classified 300 individuals in three groups with varying meditation experience and compared their pro-environmental motivations and levels of animal protein consumption. Exceeding prior attempts to compare high-impact behaviors of mindfulness practitioners and non-practitioners, we created the most detailed classification of practice engagement by assessing frequency, experience and type of meditation practice. This nuanced view on mindfulness practice reveals that advanced meditators, who reported high levels of connectedness with nature (CWN), subjective happiness and dispositional mindfulness showed significantly more concern for the environment. They also demonstrated the lowest levels of greenhouse gas emissions, land occupation and water use related to their animal-protein consumption. This study is the first to follow a self-determination theory perspective to deepen our understanding of the motivational differences between meditator groups. We revealed that advanced meditators reported significantly more integrated motivation toward the environment than non-meditators. We also provided preliminary evidence for a new theoretical framework suggesting that experiential strategies such as mindfulness practices could strengthen the relational pathway of pro-environmental behaviors. Using sequential mediation analysis, we confirmed that the negative effect of mindful compassion practice on greenhouse gas emissions from animal-protein consumption is partially mediated by CWN and integrated motivation toward the environment. While our study does not support assumptions of causality, it shows that much can be learned by studying the motivations of advanced meditators for maintaining high levels of pro-environmental behavior.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7772404
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77724042020-12-31 Practice Matters: Pro-environmental Motivations and Diet-Related Impact Vary With Meditation Experience Thiermann, Ute B. Sheate, William R. Vercammen, Ans Front Psychol Psychology Mindfulness has emerged as a potential motivator for sustainable lifestyles, yet few studies provide insight into the relationship between mindfulness practice levels and individual engagement in pro-environmental behaviors. We also lack information about the significance of meditators’ behavioral differences in terms of their measurable environmental impact and the motivational processes underlying these differences in pro-environmental performance. We classified 300 individuals in three groups with varying meditation experience and compared their pro-environmental motivations and levels of animal protein consumption. Exceeding prior attempts to compare high-impact behaviors of mindfulness practitioners and non-practitioners, we created the most detailed classification of practice engagement by assessing frequency, experience and type of meditation practice. This nuanced view on mindfulness practice reveals that advanced meditators, who reported high levels of connectedness with nature (CWN), subjective happiness and dispositional mindfulness showed significantly more concern for the environment. They also demonstrated the lowest levels of greenhouse gas emissions, land occupation and water use related to their animal-protein consumption. This study is the first to follow a self-determination theory perspective to deepen our understanding of the motivational differences between meditator groups. We revealed that advanced meditators reported significantly more integrated motivation toward the environment than non-meditators. We also provided preliminary evidence for a new theoretical framework suggesting that experiential strategies such as mindfulness practices could strengthen the relational pathway of pro-environmental behaviors. Using sequential mediation analysis, we confirmed that the negative effect of mindful compassion practice on greenhouse gas emissions from animal-protein consumption is partially mediated by CWN and integrated motivation toward the environment. While our study does not support assumptions of causality, it shows that much can be learned by studying the motivations of advanced meditators for maintaining high levels of pro-environmental behavior. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-16 /pmc/articles/PMC7772404/ /pubmed/33391103 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584353 Text en Copyright © 2020 Thiermann, Sheate and Vercammen. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Thiermann, Ute B.
Sheate, William R.
Vercammen, Ans
Practice Matters: Pro-environmental Motivations and Diet-Related Impact Vary With Meditation Experience
title Practice Matters: Pro-environmental Motivations and Diet-Related Impact Vary With Meditation Experience
title_full Practice Matters: Pro-environmental Motivations and Diet-Related Impact Vary With Meditation Experience
title_fullStr Practice Matters: Pro-environmental Motivations and Diet-Related Impact Vary With Meditation Experience
title_full_unstemmed Practice Matters: Pro-environmental Motivations and Diet-Related Impact Vary With Meditation Experience
title_short Practice Matters: Pro-environmental Motivations and Diet-Related Impact Vary With Meditation Experience
title_sort practice matters: pro-environmental motivations and diet-related impact vary with meditation experience
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772404/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391103
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.584353
work_keys_str_mv AT thiermannuteb practicemattersproenvironmentalmotivationsanddietrelatedimpactvarywithmeditationexperience
AT sheatewilliamr practicemattersproenvironmentalmotivationsanddietrelatedimpactvarywithmeditationexperience
AT vercammenans practicemattersproenvironmentalmotivationsanddietrelatedimpactvarywithmeditationexperience