Cargando…
Experimental determination of the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) Förster distances of NanoBRET and red-shifted BRET pairs
Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET) is widely applied to study protein-protein interactions, as well as increasingly to monitor both ligand binding and molecular rearrangements. The Förster distance (R(0)) describes the physical distance between the two chromophores at which 50% of the...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Elsevier
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33392495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acax.2020.100059 |
_version_ | 1783629912683315200 |
---|---|
author | Weihs, Felix Wang, Jian Pfleger, Kevin D.G. Dacres, Helen |
author_facet | Weihs, Felix Wang, Jian Pfleger, Kevin D.G. Dacres, Helen |
author_sort | Weihs, Felix |
collection | PubMed |
description | Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET) is widely applied to study protein-protein interactions, as well as increasingly to monitor both ligand binding and molecular rearrangements. The Förster distance (R(0)) describes the physical distance between the two chromophores at which 50% of the maximal energy transfer occurs and it depends on the choice of RET components. R(0) can be experimentally determined using flexible peptide linkers of known lengths to separate the two chromophores. Knowledge of the R(0) helps to inform on the choice of BRET system. For example, we have previously shown that BRET(2) exhibits the largest R(0) to date for any genetically encoded RET pair, which may be advantageous for investigating large macromolecular complexes if its issues of low and fast-decaying bioluminescence signal can be accommodated. In this study we have determined R(0) for a range of bright and red-shifted BRET pairs, including NanoBRET with tetramethylrhodamine (TMR), non-chloro TOM (NCT), mCherry or Venus as acceptor, and BRET(6), a red-shifted BRET(2)-like system. This study revealed R(0) values of 6.15 nm and 6.94 nm for NanoBRET using TMR or NCT as acceptor ligands, respectively. R(0) was 5.43 nm for NanoLuc-mCherry, 5.59 nm for NanoLuc-Venus and 5.47 nm for BRET(6). This extends the palette of available BRET Förster distances, to give researchers a better-informed choice when considering BRET systems and points towards NanoBRET with NCT as a good alternative to BRET(2) as an analysis tool for large macromolecular complexes. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7772631 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Elsevier |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77726312020-12-31 Experimental determination of the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) Förster distances of NanoBRET and red-shifted BRET pairs Weihs, Felix Wang, Jian Pfleger, Kevin D.G. Dacres, Helen Anal Chim Acta X Article Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET) is widely applied to study protein-protein interactions, as well as increasingly to monitor both ligand binding and molecular rearrangements. The Förster distance (R(0)) describes the physical distance between the two chromophores at which 50% of the maximal energy transfer occurs and it depends on the choice of RET components. R(0) can be experimentally determined using flexible peptide linkers of known lengths to separate the two chromophores. Knowledge of the R(0) helps to inform on the choice of BRET system. For example, we have previously shown that BRET(2) exhibits the largest R(0) to date for any genetically encoded RET pair, which may be advantageous for investigating large macromolecular complexes if its issues of low and fast-decaying bioluminescence signal can be accommodated. In this study we have determined R(0) for a range of bright and red-shifted BRET pairs, including NanoBRET with tetramethylrhodamine (TMR), non-chloro TOM (NCT), mCherry or Venus as acceptor, and BRET(6), a red-shifted BRET(2)-like system. This study revealed R(0) values of 6.15 nm and 6.94 nm for NanoBRET using TMR or NCT as acceptor ligands, respectively. R(0) was 5.43 nm for NanoLuc-mCherry, 5.59 nm for NanoLuc-Venus and 5.47 nm for BRET(6). This extends the palette of available BRET Förster distances, to give researchers a better-informed choice when considering BRET systems and points towards NanoBRET with NCT as a good alternative to BRET(2) as an analysis tool for large macromolecular complexes. Elsevier 2020-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7772631/ /pubmed/33392495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acax.2020.100059 Text en © 2020 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). |
spellingShingle | Article Weihs, Felix Wang, Jian Pfleger, Kevin D.G. Dacres, Helen Experimental determination of the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) Förster distances of NanoBRET and red-shifted BRET pairs |
title | Experimental determination of the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) Förster distances of NanoBRET and red-shifted BRET pairs |
title_full | Experimental determination of the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) Förster distances of NanoBRET and red-shifted BRET pairs |
title_fullStr | Experimental determination of the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) Förster distances of NanoBRET and red-shifted BRET pairs |
title_full_unstemmed | Experimental determination of the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) Förster distances of NanoBRET and red-shifted BRET pairs |
title_short | Experimental determination of the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) Förster distances of NanoBRET and red-shifted BRET pairs |
title_sort | experimental determination of the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (bret) förster distances of nanobret and red-shifted bret pairs |
topic | Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772631/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33392495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acax.2020.100059 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT weihsfelix experimentaldeterminationofthebioluminescenceresonanceenergytransferbretforsterdistancesofnanobretandredshiftedbretpairs AT wangjian experimentaldeterminationofthebioluminescenceresonanceenergytransferbretforsterdistancesofnanobretandredshiftedbretpairs AT pflegerkevindg experimentaldeterminationofthebioluminescenceresonanceenergytransferbretforsterdistancesofnanobretandredshiftedbretpairs AT dacreshelen experimentaldeterminationofthebioluminescenceresonanceenergytransferbretforsterdistancesofnanobretandredshiftedbretpairs |