Cargando…

Experimental determination of the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) Förster distances of NanoBRET and red-shifted BRET pairs

Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET) is widely applied to study protein-protein interactions, as well as increasingly to monitor both ligand binding and molecular rearrangements. The Förster distance (R(0)) describes the physical distance between the two chromophores at which 50% of the...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weihs, Felix, Wang, Jian, Pfleger, Kevin D.G., Dacres, Helen
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33392495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acax.2020.100059
_version_ 1783629912683315200
author Weihs, Felix
Wang, Jian
Pfleger, Kevin D.G.
Dacres, Helen
author_facet Weihs, Felix
Wang, Jian
Pfleger, Kevin D.G.
Dacres, Helen
author_sort Weihs, Felix
collection PubMed
description Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET) is widely applied to study protein-protein interactions, as well as increasingly to monitor both ligand binding and molecular rearrangements. The Förster distance (R(0)) describes the physical distance between the two chromophores at which 50% of the maximal energy transfer occurs and it depends on the choice of RET components. R(0) can be experimentally determined using flexible peptide linkers of known lengths to separate the two chromophores. Knowledge of the R(0) helps to inform on the choice of BRET system. For example, we have previously shown that BRET(2) exhibits the largest R(0) to date for any genetically encoded RET pair, which may be advantageous for investigating large macromolecular complexes if its issues of low and fast-decaying bioluminescence signal can be accommodated. In this study we have determined R(0) for a range of bright and red-shifted BRET pairs, including NanoBRET with tetramethylrhodamine (TMR), non-chloro TOM (NCT), mCherry or Venus as acceptor, and BRET(6), a red-shifted BRET(2)-like system. This study revealed R(0) values of 6.15 nm and 6.94 nm for NanoBRET using TMR or NCT as acceptor ligands, respectively. R(0) was 5.43 nm for NanoLuc-mCherry, 5.59 nm for NanoLuc-Venus and 5.47 nm for BRET(6). This extends the palette of available BRET Förster distances, to give researchers a better-informed choice when considering BRET systems and points towards NanoBRET with NCT as a good alternative to BRET(2) as an analysis tool for large macromolecular complexes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7772631
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77726312020-12-31 Experimental determination of the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) Förster distances of NanoBRET and red-shifted BRET pairs Weihs, Felix Wang, Jian Pfleger, Kevin D.G. Dacres, Helen Anal Chim Acta X Article Bioluminescence Resonance Energy Transfer (BRET) is widely applied to study protein-protein interactions, as well as increasingly to monitor both ligand binding and molecular rearrangements. The Förster distance (R(0)) describes the physical distance between the two chromophores at which 50% of the maximal energy transfer occurs and it depends on the choice of RET components. R(0) can be experimentally determined using flexible peptide linkers of known lengths to separate the two chromophores. Knowledge of the R(0) helps to inform on the choice of BRET system. For example, we have previously shown that BRET(2) exhibits the largest R(0) to date for any genetically encoded RET pair, which may be advantageous for investigating large macromolecular complexes if its issues of low and fast-decaying bioluminescence signal can be accommodated. In this study we have determined R(0) for a range of bright and red-shifted BRET pairs, including NanoBRET with tetramethylrhodamine (TMR), non-chloro TOM (NCT), mCherry or Venus as acceptor, and BRET(6), a red-shifted BRET(2)-like system. This study revealed R(0) values of 6.15 nm and 6.94 nm for NanoBRET using TMR or NCT as acceptor ligands, respectively. R(0) was 5.43 nm for NanoLuc-mCherry, 5.59 nm for NanoLuc-Venus and 5.47 nm for BRET(6). This extends the palette of available BRET Förster distances, to give researchers a better-informed choice when considering BRET systems and points towards NanoBRET with NCT as a good alternative to BRET(2) as an analysis tool for large macromolecular complexes. Elsevier 2020-09-02 /pmc/articles/PMC7772631/ /pubmed/33392495 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acax.2020.100059 Text en © 2020 Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organisation (CSIRO) http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Weihs, Felix
Wang, Jian
Pfleger, Kevin D.G.
Dacres, Helen
Experimental determination of the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) Förster distances of NanoBRET and red-shifted BRET pairs
title Experimental determination of the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) Förster distances of NanoBRET and red-shifted BRET pairs
title_full Experimental determination of the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) Förster distances of NanoBRET and red-shifted BRET pairs
title_fullStr Experimental determination of the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) Förster distances of NanoBRET and red-shifted BRET pairs
title_full_unstemmed Experimental determination of the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) Förster distances of NanoBRET and red-shifted BRET pairs
title_short Experimental determination of the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (BRET) Förster distances of NanoBRET and red-shifted BRET pairs
title_sort experimental determination of the bioluminescence resonance energy transfer (bret) förster distances of nanobret and red-shifted bret pairs
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772631/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33392495
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.acax.2020.100059
work_keys_str_mv AT weihsfelix experimentaldeterminationofthebioluminescenceresonanceenergytransferbretforsterdistancesofnanobretandredshiftedbretpairs
AT wangjian experimentaldeterminationofthebioluminescenceresonanceenergytransferbretforsterdistancesofnanobretandredshiftedbretpairs
AT pflegerkevindg experimentaldeterminationofthebioluminescenceresonanceenergytransferbretforsterdistancesofnanobretandredshiftedbretpairs
AT dacreshelen experimentaldeterminationofthebioluminescenceresonanceenergytransferbretforsterdistancesofnanobretandredshiftedbretpairs