Cargando…
Effect of environmental enrichment devices on behavior of individually housed beef heifers
In research settings, certain experimental designs may require cattle to be housed individually. Individual housing of cattle may make the animals more susceptible to boredom and result the development of undesirable behaviors. The objective of this trial was to investigate the effects of different...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa220 |
_version_ | 1783629917109354496 |
---|---|
author | Bruno, Kelsey DeSocio, Elizabeth White, Jason Wilson, Blake K |
author_facet | Bruno, Kelsey DeSocio, Elizabeth White, Jason Wilson, Blake K |
author_sort | Bruno, Kelsey |
collection | PubMed |
description | In research settings, certain experimental designs may require cattle to be housed individually. Individual housing of cattle may make the animals more susceptible to boredom and result the development of undesirable behaviors. The objective of this trial was to investigate the effects of different environmental enrichment devices (EED) on the behavior and feed intake of heifers. Twenty mixed-breed single-sourced heifers were used in a completely random design. Heifers were housed individually (3.05 m × 3.66 m) with the ability to have physical contact with adjacent heifers. Heifers were randomly assigned to one of the four EED treatments, including a jolly ball (JLY), a broom head (SRCH), a 182 cm 5-knot rope (RP), or a Pas-a-Fier roller (RLR). Behavior was recorded using 8 h long daily instantaneous scan sampling in 30 min intervals over three periods: 7 d prior to EED addition (PR), 7 d with EED (EDP), and 7 d after removing EED (PST). Standing, laying, eating, drinking, and exploratory behaviors were evaluated. Exploratory behaviors included: interaction with water trough, feed bunk, water pipe, pen gate, pen wall, EED, grooming, or allogrooming. Rumination behavior was also recorded during each observation time. Time standing and standing bouts were greatest for RP (P < 0.05), while JLY and RLR spent the most time lying down (P < 0.05). All heifers spent the majority of observation times lying down, followed by solely standing (P < 0.05). Heifers on the RP treatment interacted the most with their EED, followed by SRCH (P < 0.001). Rumination increased during EDP compared to PR (P < 0.001). These results suggest that a RP suspended from the ceiling in the pen may be used most frequently by individually housed beef heifers. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7772664 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77726642021-01-05 Effect of environmental enrichment devices on behavior of individually housed beef heifers Bruno, Kelsey DeSocio, Elizabeth White, Jason Wilson, Blake K Transl Anim Sci Animal Behavior and Cognition In research settings, certain experimental designs may require cattle to be housed individually. Individual housing of cattle may make the animals more susceptible to boredom and result the development of undesirable behaviors. The objective of this trial was to investigate the effects of different environmental enrichment devices (EED) on the behavior and feed intake of heifers. Twenty mixed-breed single-sourced heifers were used in a completely random design. Heifers were housed individually (3.05 m × 3.66 m) with the ability to have physical contact with adjacent heifers. Heifers were randomly assigned to one of the four EED treatments, including a jolly ball (JLY), a broom head (SRCH), a 182 cm 5-knot rope (RP), or a Pas-a-Fier roller (RLR). Behavior was recorded using 8 h long daily instantaneous scan sampling in 30 min intervals over three periods: 7 d prior to EED addition (PR), 7 d with EED (EDP), and 7 d after removing EED (PST). Standing, laying, eating, drinking, and exploratory behaviors were evaluated. Exploratory behaviors included: interaction with water trough, feed bunk, water pipe, pen gate, pen wall, EED, grooming, or allogrooming. Rumination behavior was also recorded during each observation time. Time standing and standing bouts were greatest for RP (P < 0.05), while JLY and RLR spent the most time lying down (P < 0.05). All heifers spent the majority of observation times lying down, followed by solely standing (P < 0.05). Heifers on the RP treatment interacted the most with their EED, followed by SRCH (P < 0.001). Rumination increased during EDP compared to PR (P < 0.001). These results suggest that a RP suspended from the ceiling in the pen may be used most frequently by individually housed beef heifers. Oxford University Press 2020-11-28 /pmc/articles/PMC7772664/ /pubmed/33409471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa220 Text en © The Author(s) 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Society of Animal Science. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted reuse, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Animal Behavior and Cognition Bruno, Kelsey DeSocio, Elizabeth White, Jason Wilson, Blake K Effect of environmental enrichment devices on behavior of individually housed beef heifers |
title | Effect of environmental enrichment devices on behavior of individually housed beef heifers |
title_full | Effect of environmental enrichment devices on behavior of individually housed beef heifers |
title_fullStr | Effect of environmental enrichment devices on behavior of individually housed beef heifers |
title_full_unstemmed | Effect of environmental enrichment devices on behavior of individually housed beef heifers |
title_short | Effect of environmental enrichment devices on behavior of individually housed beef heifers |
title_sort | effect of environmental enrichment devices on behavior of individually housed beef heifers |
topic | Animal Behavior and Cognition |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7772664/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409471 http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/tas/txaa220 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT brunokelsey effectofenvironmentalenrichmentdevicesonbehaviorofindividuallyhousedbeefheifers AT desocioelizabeth effectofenvironmentalenrichmentdevicesonbehaviorofindividuallyhousedbeefheifers AT whitejason effectofenvironmentalenrichmentdevicesonbehaviorofindividuallyhousedbeefheifers AT wilsonblakek effectofenvironmentalenrichmentdevicesonbehaviorofindividuallyhousedbeefheifers |