Cargando…

Comparison of phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI derived perfusion and ventilation parameters at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of different field strengths on perfusion and ventilation parameters, SNR and CNR derived by PREFUL MRI using predefined sequence parameters. METHODS: Data sets of free breathing 2d FLASH lung MRI were acquired from 15 healthy subjects...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Glandorf, Julian, Klimeš, Filip, Voskrebenzev, Andreas, Gutberlet, Marcel, Behrendt, Lea, Crisosto, Cristian, Wacker, Frank, Ciet, Pierluigi, Wild, Jim M., Vogel-Claussen, Jens
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7773267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33378373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244638
_version_ 1783630025327640576
author Glandorf, Julian
Klimeš, Filip
Voskrebenzev, Andreas
Gutberlet, Marcel
Behrendt, Lea
Crisosto, Cristian
Wacker, Frank
Ciet, Pierluigi
Wild, Jim M.
Vogel-Claussen, Jens
author_facet Glandorf, Julian
Klimeš, Filip
Voskrebenzev, Andreas
Gutberlet, Marcel
Behrendt, Lea
Crisosto, Cristian
Wacker, Frank
Ciet, Pierluigi
Wild, Jim M.
Vogel-Claussen, Jens
author_sort Glandorf, Julian
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of different field strengths on perfusion and ventilation parameters, SNR and CNR derived by PREFUL MRI using predefined sequence parameters. METHODS: Data sets of free breathing 2d FLASH lung MRI were acquired from 15 healthy subjects at 1.5T and 3T (Magnetom Avanto and Skyra, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with a maximum period of 3 days in between. The processed functional parameters regional ventilation (RVent), perfusion (Q), quantified perfusion (Q(Quant)), perfusion defect percentage (QDP), ventilation defect percentage (VDP) and ventilation-perfusion match (VQM) were compared for systematic differences. Signal- and contrast-to-noise ratio (SNR and CNR) of both acquisitions were analyzed. RESULTS: RVent, Q, VDP, SNR and CNR presented no significant differences between 1.5T and 3T. Q(Quant) (1.5T vs. 3T, P = 0.04), and QDP (1.5T vs. 3T, P≤0.01) decreased significantly at 3T. Consequently, VQM increased significantly (1.5T vs. 3T, P≤0.01). Skewness and kurtosis of the Q-values increased significantly at 3T (P≤0.01). The mean Sørensen-Dice coefficients between both series were 0.91 for QDP and 0.94 for VDP. The Bland-Altman analysis of both series showed mean differences of 4.29% for QDP, 1.23% for VDP and -5.15% for VQM. Using the above-mentioned parameters for three-day repeatability at two different scanners and field strengths, the retrospective power calculation showed, that a sample size of 15 can detect differences of 3.7% for QDP, of 2.9% for VDP and differences of 2.6% for VQM. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in QDP may be related to field inhomogeneities, which is expressed by increasing skewness and kurtosis at 3T. Q(Quant) reveals only poor reproducibility between 1.5T and 3T. RVent, Q, VDP, SNR and CNR were not altered significantly at the used sequence parameters. Healthy participants with minimal defects present high spatial agreement of QDP and VDP.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7773267
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77732672021-01-07 Comparison of phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI derived perfusion and ventilation parameters at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers Glandorf, Julian Klimeš, Filip Voskrebenzev, Andreas Gutberlet, Marcel Behrendt, Lea Crisosto, Cristian Wacker, Frank Ciet, Pierluigi Wild, Jim M. Vogel-Claussen, Jens PLoS One Research Article PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the influence of different field strengths on perfusion and ventilation parameters, SNR and CNR derived by PREFUL MRI using predefined sequence parameters. METHODS: Data sets of free breathing 2d FLASH lung MRI were acquired from 15 healthy subjects at 1.5T and 3T (Magnetom Avanto and Skyra, Siemens Healthcare, Erlangen, Germany) with a maximum period of 3 days in between. The processed functional parameters regional ventilation (RVent), perfusion (Q), quantified perfusion (Q(Quant)), perfusion defect percentage (QDP), ventilation defect percentage (VDP) and ventilation-perfusion match (VQM) were compared for systematic differences. Signal- and contrast-to-noise ratio (SNR and CNR) of both acquisitions were analyzed. RESULTS: RVent, Q, VDP, SNR and CNR presented no significant differences between 1.5T and 3T. Q(Quant) (1.5T vs. 3T, P = 0.04), and QDP (1.5T vs. 3T, P≤0.01) decreased significantly at 3T. Consequently, VQM increased significantly (1.5T vs. 3T, P≤0.01). Skewness and kurtosis of the Q-values increased significantly at 3T (P≤0.01). The mean Sørensen-Dice coefficients between both series were 0.91 for QDP and 0.94 for VDP. The Bland-Altman analysis of both series showed mean differences of 4.29% for QDP, 1.23% for VDP and -5.15% for VQM. Using the above-mentioned parameters for three-day repeatability at two different scanners and field strengths, the retrospective power calculation showed, that a sample size of 15 can detect differences of 3.7% for QDP, of 2.9% for VDP and differences of 2.6% for VQM. CONCLUSION: Significant differences in QDP may be related to field inhomogeneities, which is expressed by increasing skewness and kurtosis at 3T. Q(Quant) reveals only poor reproducibility between 1.5T and 3T. RVent, Q, VDP, SNR and CNR were not altered significantly at the used sequence parameters. Healthy participants with minimal defects present high spatial agreement of QDP and VDP. Public Library of Science 2020-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7773267/ /pubmed/33378373 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244638 Text en © 2020 Glandorf et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Glandorf, Julian
Klimeš, Filip
Voskrebenzev, Andreas
Gutberlet, Marcel
Behrendt, Lea
Crisosto, Cristian
Wacker, Frank
Ciet, Pierluigi
Wild, Jim M.
Vogel-Claussen, Jens
Comparison of phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI derived perfusion and ventilation parameters at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers
title Comparison of phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI derived perfusion and ventilation parameters at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers
title_full Comparison of phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI derived perfusion and ventilation parameters at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers
title_fullStr Comparison of phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI derived perfusion and ventilation parameters at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers
title_full_unstemmed Comparison of phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI derived perfusion and ventilation parameters at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers
title_short Comparison of phase-resolved functional lung (PREFUL) MRI derived perfusion and ventilation parameters at 1.5T and 3T in healthy volunteers
title_sort comparison of phase-resolved functional lung (preful) mri derived perfusion and ventilation parameters at 1.5t and 3t in healthy volunteers
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7773267/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33378373
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0244638
work_keys_str_mv AT glandorfjulian comparisonofphaseresolvedfunctionallungprefulmriderivedperfusionandventilationparametersat15tand3tinhealthyvolunteers
AT klimesfilip comparisonofphaseresolvedfunctionallungprefulmriderivedperfusionandventilationparametersat15tand3tinhealthyvolunteers
AT voskrebenzevandreas comparisonofphaseresolvedfunctionallungprefulmriderivedperfusionandventilationparametersat15tand3tinhealthyvolunteers
AT gutberletmarcel comparisonofphaseresolvedfunctionallungprefulmriderivedperfusionandventilationparametersat15tand3tinhealthyvolunteers
AT behrendtlea comparisonofphaseresolvedfunctionallungprefulmriderivedperfusionandventilationparametersat15tand3tinhealthyvolunteers
AT crisostocristian comparisonofphaseresolvedfunctionallungprefulmriderivedperfusionandventilationparametersat15tand3tinhealthyvolunteers
AT wackerfrank comparisonofphaseresolvedfunctionallungprefulmriderivedperfusionandventilationparametersat15tand3tinhealthyvolunteers
AT cietpierluigi comparisonofphaseresolvedfunctionallungprefulmriderivedperfusionandventilationparametersat15tand3tinhealthyvolunteers
AT wildjimm comparisonofphaseresolvedfunctionallungprefulmriderivedperfusionandventilationparametersat15tand3tinhealthyvolunteers
AT vogelclaussenjens comparisonofphaseresolvedfunctionallungprefulmriderivedperfusionandventilationparametersat15tand3tinhealthyvolunteers