Cargando…

Techniques for In Vivo Measurement of Ligament and Tendon Strain: A Review

The critical clinical and scientific insights achieved through knowledge of in vivo musculoskeletal soft tissue strains has motivated the development of relevant measurement techniques. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the key findings, limitations, and clinical impacts of these techn...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Zhang, Qiang, Adam, Naomi C., Hosseini Nasab, S. H., Taylor, William R., Smith, Colin R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Springer International Publishing 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7773624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33025317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02635-5
_version_ 1783630083268804608
author Zhang, Qiang
Adam, Naomi C.
Hosseini Nasab, S. H.
Taylor, William R.
Smith, Colin R.
author_facet Zhang, Qiang
Adam, Naomi C.
Hosseini Nasab, S. H.
Taylor, William R.
Smith, Colin R.
author_sort Zhang, Qiang
collection PubMed
description The critical clinical and scientific insights achieved through knowledge of in vivo musculoskeletal soft tissue strains has motivated the development of relevant measurement techniques. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the key findings, limitations, and clinical impacts of these techniques to quantify musculoskeletal soft tissue strains during dynamic movements. Current technologies generally leverage three techniques to quantify in vivo strain patterns, including implantable strain sensors, virtual fibre elongation, and ultrasound. (1) Implantable strain sensors enable direct measurements of tissue strains with high accuracy and minimal artefact, but are highly invasive and current designs are not clinically viable. (2) The virtual fibre elongation method tracks the relative displacement of tissue attachments to measure strains in both deep and superficial tissues. However, the associated imaging techniques often require exposure to radiation, limit the activities that can be performed, and only quantify bone-to-bone tissue strains. (3) Ultrasound methods enable safe and non-invasive imaging of soft tissue deformation. However, ultrasound can only image superficial tissues, and measurements are confounded by out-of-plane tissue motion. Finally, all in vivo strain measurement methods are limited in their ability to establish the slack length of musculoskeletal soft tissue structures. Despite the many challenges and limitations of these measurement techniques, knowledge of in vivo soft tissue strain has led to improved clinical treatments for many musculoskeletal pathologies including anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Achilles tendon repair, and total knee replacement. This review provides a comprehensive understanding of these measurement techniques and identifies the key features of in vivo strain measurement that can facilitate innovative personalized sports medicine treatment.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7773624
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Springer International Publishing
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77736242021-01-04 Techniques for In Vivo Measurement of Ligament and Tendon Strain: A Review Zhang, Qiang Adam, Naomi C. Hosseini Nasab, S. H. Taylor, William R. Smith, Colin R. Ann Biomed Eng Review The critical clinical and scientific insights achieved through knowledge of in vivo musculoskeletal soft tissue strains has motivated the development of relevant measurement techniques. This review provides a comprehensive summary of the key findings, limitations, and clinical impacts of these techniques to quantify musculoskeletal soft tissue strains during dynamic movements. Current technologies generally leverage three techniques to quantify in vivo strain patterns, including implantable strain sensors, virtual fibre elongation, and ultrasound. (1) Implantable strain sensors enable direct measurements of tissue strains with high accuracy and minimal artefact, but are highly invasive and current designs are not clinically viable. (2) The virtual fibre elongation method tracks the relative displacement of tissue attachments to measure strains in both deep and superficial tissues. However, the associated imaging techniques often require exposure to radiation, limit the activities that can be performed, and only quantify bone-to-bone tissue strains. (3) Ultrasound methods enable safe and non-invasive imaging of soft tissue deformation. However, ultrasound can only image superficial tissues, and measurements are confounded by out-of-plane tissue motion. Finally, all in vivo strain measurement methods are limited in their ability to establish the slack length of musculoskeletal soft tissue structures. Despite the many challenges and limitations of these measurement techniques, knowledge of in vivo soft tissue strain has led to improved clinical treatments for many musculoskeletal pathologies including anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction, Achilles tendon repair, and total knee replacement. This review provides a comprehensive understanding of these measurement techniques and identifies the key features of in vivo strain measurement that can facilitate innovative personalized sports medicine treatment. Springer International Publishing 2020-10-06 2021 /pmc/articles/PMC7773624/ /pubmed/33025317 http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02635-5 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
spellingShingle Review
Zhang, Qiang
Adam, Naomi C.
Hosseini Nasab, S. H.
Taylor, William R.
Smith, Colin R.
Techniques for In Vivo Measurement of Ligament and Tendon Strain: A Review
title Techniques for In Vivo Measurement of Ligament and Tendon Strain: A Review
title_full Techniques for In Vivo Measurement of Ligament and Tendon Strain: A Review
title_fullStr Techniques for In Vivo Measurement of Ligament and Tendon Strain: A Review
title_full_unstemmed Techniques for In Vivo Measurement of Ligament and Tendon Strain: A Review
title_short Techniques for In Vivo Measurement of Ligament and Tendon Strain: A Review
title_sort techniques for in vivo measurement of ligament and tendon strain: a review
topic Review
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7773624/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33025317
http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10439-020-02635-5
work_keys_str_mv AT zhangqiang techniquesforinvivomeasurementofligamentandtendonstrainareview
AT adamnaomic techniquesforinvivomeasurementofligamentandtendonstrainareview
AT hosseininasabsh techniquesforinvivomeasurementofligamentandtendonstrainareview
AT taylorwilliamr techniquesforinvivomeasurementofligamentandtendonstrainareview
AT smithcolinr techniquesforinvivomeasurementofligamentandtendonstrainareview