Cargando…
Motivational Mindsets and Reasons for Studying: Development and Validation of a Classification Tool
First-year university students have multiple motives for studying and these motives may interact. Yet, past research has primarily focused on a variable-centered, dimensional approach missing out on the possibility to study the joint effect of multiple motives that students may have. Examining the i...
Autores principales: | , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Frontiers Media S.A.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7773725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.535801 |
_version_ | 1783630107378712576 |
---|---|
author | Hudig, Job Scheepers, Ad W. A. Schippers, Michaéla C. Smeets, Guus |
author_facet | Hudig, Job Scheepers, Ad W. A. Schippers, Michaéla C. Smeets, Guus |
author_sort | Hudig, Job |
collection | PubMed |
description | First-year university students have multiple motives for studying and these motives may interact. Yet, past research has primarily focused on a variable-centered, dimensional approach missing out on the possibility to study the joint effect of multiple motives that students may have. Examining the interplay between motives is key to (a) better explain student differences in study success and wellbeing, and (b) to understand different effects that interventions can have in terms of wellbeing and study success. We therefore applied a student-centered, multidimensional approach in which we explored motivational profiles of first-year university students by combining three dimensions of motives for studying (self-transcendent, self-oriented, and extrinsic) which have been shown to be differently related to academic functioning. Using cluster analysis in two independent, consecutive university student cohorts (n = 763 and n = 815), we identified four meaningful profiles and coined them motivational mindsets. We validated the four mindset profiles not only within each student sample but also found almost identical profiles between the student samples. The motivational mindset profiles were labeled: high-impact mindset, low-impact mindset, social-impact mindset, and self-impact mindset. In addition to validating the paradigm, we developed a mindset classification tool to further use these mindsets in practice and in future research. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7773725 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Frontiers Media S.A. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77737252021-01-01 Motivational Mindsets and Reasons for Studying: Development and Validation of a Classification Tool Hudig, Job Scheepers, Ad W. A. Schippers, Michaéla C. Smeets, Guus Front Psychol Psychology First-year university students have multiple motives for studying and these motives may interact. Yet, past research has primarily focused on a variable-centered, dimensional approach missing out on the possibility to study the joint effect of multiple motives that students may have. Examining the interplay between motives is key to (a) better explain student differences in study success and wellbeing, and (b) to understand different effects that interventions can have in terms of wellbeing and study success. We therefore applied a student-centered, multidimensional approach in which we explored motivational profiles of first-year university students by combining three dimensions of motives for studying (self-transcendent, self-oriented, and extrinsic) which have been shown to be differently related to academic functioning. Using cluster analysis in two independent, consecutive university student cohorts (n = 763 and n = 815), we identified four meaningful profiles and coined them motivational mindsets. We validated the four mindset profiles not only within each student sample but also found almost identical profiles between the student samples. The motivational mindset profiles were labeled: high-impact mindset, low-impact mindset, social-impact mindset, and self-impact mindset. In addition to validating the paradigm, we developed a mindset classification tool to further use these mindsets in practice and in future research. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7773725/ /pubmed/33391065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.535801 Text en Copyright © 2020 Hudig, Scheepers, Schippers and Smeets. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms. |
spellingShingle | Psychology Hudig, Job Scheepers, Ad W. A. Schippers, Michaéla C. Smeets, Guus Motivational Mindsets and Reasons for Studying: Development and Validation of a Classification Tool |
title | Motivational Mindsets and Reasons for Studying: Development and Validation of a Classification Tool |
title_full | Motivational Mindsets and Reasons for Studying: Development and Validation of a Classification Tool |
title_fullStr | Motivational Mindsets and Reasons for Studying: Development and Validation of a Classification Tool |
title_full_unstemmed | Motivational Mindsets and Reasons for Studying: Development and Validation of a Classification Tool |
title_short | Motivational Mindsets and Reasons for Studying: Development and Validation of a Classification Tool |
title_sort | motivational mindsets and reasons for studying: development and validation of a classification tool |
topic | Psychology |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7773725/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.535801 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hudigjob motivationalmindsetsandreasonsforstudyingdevelopmentandvalidationofaclassificationtool AT scheepersadwa motivationalmindsetsandreasonsforstudyingdevelopmentandvalidationofaclassificationtool AT schippersmichaelac motivationalmindsetsandreasonsforstudyingdevelopmentandvalidationofaclassificationtool AT smeetsguus motivationalmindsetsandreasonsforstudyingdevelopmentandvalidationofaclassificationtool |