Cargando…

Motivational Mindsets and Reasons for Studying: Development and Validation of a Classification Tool

First-year university students have multiple motives for studying and these motives may interact. Yet, past research has primarily focused on a variable-centered, dimensional approach missing out on the possibility to study the joint effect of multiple motives that students may have. Examining the i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hudig, Job, Scheepers, Ad W. A., Schippers, Michaéla C., Smeets, Guus
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7773725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391065
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.535801
_version_ 1783630107378712576
author Hudig, Job
Scheepers, Ad W. A.
Schippers, Michaéla C.
Smeets, Guus
author_facet Hudig, Job
Scheepers, Ad W. A.
Schippers, Michaéla C.
Smeets, Guus
author_sort Hudig, Job
collection PubMed
description First-year university students have multiple motives for studying and these motives may interact. Yet, past research has primarily focused on a variable-centered, dimensional approach missing out on the possibility to study the joint effect of multiple motives that students may have. Examining the interplay between motives is key to (a) better explain student differences in study success and wellbeing, and (b) to understand different effects that interventions can have in terms of wellbeing and study success. We therefore applied a student-centered, multidimensional approach in which we explored motivational profiles of first-year university students by combining three dimensions of motives for studying (self-transcendent, self-oriented, and extrinsic) which have been shown to be differently related to academic functioning. Using cluster analysis in two independent, consecutive university student cohorts (n = 763 and n = 815), we identified four meaningful profiles and coined them motivational mindsets. We validated the four mindset profiles not only within each student sample but also found almost identical profiles between the student samples. The motivational mindset profiles were labeled: high-impact mindset, low-impact mindset, social-impact mindset, and self-impact mindset. In addition to validating the paradigm, we developed a mindset classification tool to further use these mindsets in practice and in future research.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7773725
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77737252021-01-01 Motivational Mindsets and Reasons for Studying: Development and Validation of a Classification Tool Hudig, Job Scheepers, Ad W. A. Schippers, Michaéla C. Smeets, Guus Front Psychol Psychology First-year university students have multiple motives for studying and these motives may interact. Yet, past research has primarily focused on a variable-centered, dimensional approach missing out on the possibility to study the joint effect of multiple motives that students may have. Examining the interplay between motives is key to (a) better explain student differences in study success and wellbeing, and (b) to understand different effects that interventions can have in terms of wellbeing and study success. We therefore applied a student-centered, multidimensional approach in which we explored motivational profiles of first-year university students by combining three dimensions of motives for studying (self-transcendent, self-oriented, and extrinsic) which have been shown to be differently related to academic functioning. Using cluster analysis in two independent, consecutive university student cohorts (n = 763 and n = 815), we identified four meaningful profiles and coined them motivational mindsets. We validated the four mindset profiles not only within each student sample but also found almost identical profiles between the student samples. The motivational mindset profiles were labeled: high-impact mindset, low-impact mindset, social-impact mindset, and self-impact mindset. In addition to validating the paradigm, we developed a mindset classification tool to further use these mindsets in practice and in future research. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-17 /pmc/articles/PMC7773725/ /pubmed/33391065 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.535801 Text en Copyright © 2020 Hudig, Scheepers, Schippers and Smeets. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Hudig, Job
Scheepers, Ad W. A.
Schippers, Michaéla C.
Smeets, Guus
Motivational Mindsets and Reasons for Studying: Development and Validation of a Classification Tool
title Motivational Mindsets and Reasons for Studying: Development and Validation of a Classification Tool
title_full Motivational Mindsets and Reasons for Studying: Development and Validation of a Classification Tool
title_fullStr Motivational Mindsets and Reasons for Studying: Development and Validation of a Classification Tool
title_full_unstemmed Motivational Mindsets and Reasons for Studying: Development and Validation of a Classification Tool
title_short Motivational Mindsets and Reasons for Studying: Development and Validation of a Classification Tool
title_sort motivational mindsets and reasons for studying: development and validation of a classification tool
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7773725/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391065
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.535801
work_keys_str_mv AT hudigjob motivationalmindsetsandreasonsforstudyingdevelopmentandvalidationofaclassificationtool
AT scheepersadwa motivationalmindsetsandreasonsforstudyingdevelopmentandvalidationofaclassificationtool
AT schippersmichaelac motivationalmindsetsandreasonsforstudyingdevelopmentandvalidationofaclassificationtool
AT smeetsguus motivationalmindsetsandreasonsforstudyingdevelopmentandvalidationofaclassificationtool