Cargando…

Dosimetric Feasibility Study of Dose Escalated Stereotactic Body Radiation Therapy (SBRT) in Locally Advanced Pancreatic Cancer (LAPC) Patients: It Is Time to Raise the Bar

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To assess the dosimetric feasibility of a stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) dose escalated protocol, with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) and a simultaneous integrated protection (SIP) approach, in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). MATERIAL...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mazzarotto, Renzo, Simoni, Nicola, Guariglia, Stefania, Rossi, Gabriella, Micera, Renato, De Robertis, Riccardo, Pierelli, Alessio, Zivelonghi, Emanuele, Malleo, Giuseppe, Paiella, Salvatore, Salvia, Roberto, Cavedon, Carlo, Milella, Michele, Bassi, Claudio
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7773844/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33392093
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.600940
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: To assess the dosimetric feasibility of a stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) dose escalated protocol, with a simultaneous integrated boost (SIB) and a simultaneous integrated protection (SIP) approach, in patients with locally advanced pancreatic cancer (LAPC). MATERIAL AND METHODS: Twenty LAPC lesions, previously treated with SBRT at our Institution, were re-planned. The original prescribed and administered dose was 50/30/25 Gy in five fractions to PTV(sib) (tumor-vessel interface [TVI])/PTV(t) (tumor volume)/PTV(sip) (overlap area between PTV(t) and planning organs at risk volume [PRV(oars)]), respectively. At re-planning, the prescribed dose was escalated up to 60/40/33 Gy in five fractions to PTV(sib)/PTV(t)/PTV(sip), respectively. All plans were performed using an inspiration breath hold (IBH) technique and generated with volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT). Well-established and accepted OAR dose constraints were used (D(0.5cc) < 33 Gy for luminal OARs and D(0.5cc) < 38 Gy for corresponding PRV(oars)). The primary end-point was to achieve a median dose equal to the prescription dose for the PTV(sib) with D(98)≥ 95% (95% of prescription dose is the minimum dose), and a coverage for PTV(t) and PTV(sip) of D(95)≥95%, with minor deviations in OAR dose constraints in < 10% of the plans. RESULTS: PTV(sib) median (± SD) dose/D(95)/conformity index (CI) were 60.54 (± 0.85) Gy/58.96 (± 0.86) Gy/0.99 (± 0.01), respectively; whilst PTV(t) median (± SD) dose/D(95) were 44.51 (± 2.69) Gy/38.44 (± 0.82) Gy, and PTV(sip) median (± SD) dose/D(95) were 35.18 (± 1.42) Gy/33.01 (± 0.84) Gy, respectively. With regard to OARs, median (± SD) maximum dose (D(0.5cc)) to duodenum/stomach/bowel was 29.31 (± 5.72) Gy/25.29 (± 6.90) Gy/27.03 (± 5.67) Gy, respectively. A minor acceptable deviation was found for a single plan (bowel and duodenum D(0.5cc)=34.8 Gy). V38 < 0.5 cc was achieved for all PRV luminal OARs. CONCLUSIONS: In LAPC patients SBRT, with a SIB/SIP dose escalation approach up to 60/40/33 Gy in five fractions to PTV(sib)/PTV(t)/PTV(sip), respectively, is dosimetrically feasible with adequate PTVs coverage and respect for OAR dose constraints.