Cargando…

Assessing an Electronic Health Record research platform for identification of clinical trial participants

Electronic health records (EHR) are a potential resource for identification of clinical trial participants. We evaluated how accurately a commercially available EHR Research Platform, InSite, is able to identify potential trial participants from the EHR system of a large tertiary care hospital. Pati...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Laaksonen, Niina, Varjonen, Juha-Matti, Blomster, Minna, Palomäki, Antti, Vasankari, Tuija, Airaksinen, Juhani, Huupponen, Risto, Scheinin, Mika, Juuso Blomster
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Elsevier 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7773855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100692
_version_ 1783630137911148544
author Laaksonen, Niina
Varjonen, Juha-Matti
Blomster, Minna
Palomäki, Antti
Vasankari, Tuija
Airaksinen, Juhani
Huupponen, Risto
Scheinin, Mika
Juuso Blomster
author_facet Laaksonen, Niina
Varjonen, Juha-Matti
Blomster, Minna
Palomäki, Antti
Vasankari, Tuija
Airaksinen, Juhani
Huupponen, Risto
Scheinin, Mika
Juuso Blomster
author_sort Laaksonen, Niina
collection PubMed
description Electronic health records (EHR) are a potential resource for identification of clinical trial participants. We evaluated how accurately a commercially available EHR Research Platform, InSite, is able to identify potential trial participants from the EHR system of a large tertiary care hospital. Patient counts were compared with results obtained in a conventional manual search performed for a reference study that investigated the associations of atrial fibrillation (AF) and cerebrovascular incidents. The Clinical Data Warehouse (CDW) of Turku University Hospital was used to verify the capabilities of the EHR Research Platform. The EHR query resulted in a larger patient count than the manual query (EHR Research Platform 5859 patients, manual selection 2166 patients). This was due to the different search logic and some exclusion criteria that were not addressable in structured digital format. The EHR Research Platform (5859 patients) and the CDW search (5840 patients) employed the same search logic. The temporal relationship between the two diagnoses could be identified when they were available in structured format and the time difference was longer than a single hospital visit. Searching for patients with the EHR Research Platform can help to identify potential trial participants from a hospital's EHR system by limiting the number of records to be manually reviewed. EHR query tools can best be utilized in trials where the selection criteria are expressed in structured digital format.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7773855
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Elsevier
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77738552021-01-05 Assessing an Electronic Health Record research platform for identification of clinical trial participants Laaksonen, Niina Varjonen, Juha-Matti Blomster, Minna Palomäki, Antti Vasankari, Tuija Airaksinen, Juhani Huupponen, Risto Scheinin, Mika Juuso Blomster Contemp Clin Trials Commun Article Electronic health records (EHR) are a potential resource for identification of clinical trial participants. We evaluated how accurately a commercially available EHR Research Platform, InSite, is able to identify potential trial participants from the EHR system of a large tertiary care hospital. Patient counts were compared with results obtained in a conventional manual search performed for a reference study that investigated the associations of atrial fibrillation (AF) and cerebrovascular incidents. The Clinical Data Warehouse (CDW) of Turku University Hospital was used to verify the capabilities of the EHR Research Platform. The EHR query resulted in a larger patient count than the manual query (EHR Research Platform 5859 patients, manual selection 2166 patients). This was due to the different search logic and some exclusion criteria that were not addressable in structured digital format. The EHR Research Platform (5859 patients) and the CDW search (5840 patients) employed the same search logic. The temporal relationship between the two diagnoses could be identified when they were available in structured format and the time difference was longer than a single hospital visit. Searching for patients with the EHR Research Platform can help to identify potential trial participants from a hospital's EHR system by limiting the number of records to be manually reviewed. EHR query tools can best be utilized in trials where the selection criteria are expressed in structured digital format. Elsevier 2020-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7773855/ /pubmed/33409423 http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100692 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Published by Elsevier Inc. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).
spellingShingle Article
Laaksonen, Niina
Varjonen, Juha-Matti
Blomster, Minna
Palomäki, Antti
Vasankari, Tuija
Airaksinen, Juhani
Huupponen, Risto
Scheinin, Mika
Juuso Blomster
Assessing an Electronic Health Record research platform for identification of clinical trial participants
title Assessing an Electronic Health Record research platform for identification of clinical trial participants
title_full Assessing an Electronic Health Record research platform for identification of clinical trial participants
title_fullStr Assessing an Electronic Health Record research platform for identification of clinical trial participants
title_full_unstemmed Assessing an Electronic Health Record research platform for identification of clinical trial participants
title_short Assessing an Electronic Health Record research platform for identification of clinical trial participants
title_sort assessing an electronic health record research platform for identification of clinical trial participants
topic Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7773855/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33409423
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.conctc.2020.100692
work_keys_str_mv AT laaksonenniina assessinganelectronichealthrecordresearchplatformforidentificationofclinicaltrialparticipants
AT varjonenjuhamatti assessinganelectronichealthrecordresearchplatformforidentificationofclinicaltrialparticipants
AT blomsterminna assessinganelectronichealthrecordresearchplatformforidentificationofclinicaltrialparticipants
AT palomakiantti assessinganelectronichealthrecordresearchplatformforidentificationofclinicaltrialparticipants
AT vasankarituija assessinganelectronichealthrecordresearchplatformforidentificationofclinicaltrialparticipants
AT airaksinenjuhani assessinganelectronichealthrecordresearchplatformforidentificationofclinicaltrialparticipants
AT huupponenristo assessinganelectronichealthrecordresearchplatformforidentificationofclinicaltrialparticipants
AT scheininmika assessinganelectronichealthrecordresearchplatformforidentificationofclinicaltrialparticipants
AT juusoblomster assessinganelectronichealthrecordresearchplatformforidentificationofclinicaltrialparticipants