Cargando…

A New Medical Device to Provide Independent Ventilation to Two Subjects Using a Single Ventilator: Evaluation in Lung-Healthy Pigs

BACKGROUND: The global crisis situation caused by SARS-CoV-2 has created an explosive demand for ventilators, which cannot be met even in developed countries. Designing a simple and inexpensive device with the ability to increase the number of patients that can be connected to existing ventilators w...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lugones, Ignacio, Orofino Giambastiani, Roberto, Robledo, Oscar, Marcos, Martín, Mouly, Javier, Gallo, Agustín, Laulhé, Verónica, Biancolini, María Fernanda
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Hindawi 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7774300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33456461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8866806
_version_ 1783630236152233984
author Lugones, Ignacio
Orofino Giambastiani, Roberto
Robledo, Oscar
Marcos, Martín
Mouly, Javier
Gallo, Agustín
Laulhé, Verónica
Biancolini, María Fernanda
author_facet Lugones, Ignacio
Orofino Giambastiani, Roberto
Robledo, Oscar
Marcos, Martín
Mouly, Javier
Gallo, Agustín
Laulhé, Verónica
Biancolini, María Fernanda
author_sort Lugones, Ignacio
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The global crisis situation caused by SARS-CoV-2 has created an explosive demand for ventilators, which cannot be met even in developed countries. Designing a simple and inexpensive device with the ability to increase the number of patients that can be connected to existing ventilators would have a major impact on the number of lives that could be saved. We conducted a study to determine whether two pigs with significant differences in size and weight could be ventilated simultaneously using a single ventilator connected to a new medical device called DuplicARⓇ. METHODS: Six pigs (median weight 12 kg, range 9–25 kg) were connected in pairs to a single ventilator using the new device for 6 hours. Both the ventilator and the device were manipulated throughout the experiment according to the needs of each animal. Tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure were individually controlled with the device. Primary and secondary outcome variables were defined to assess ventilation and hemodynamics in all animals throughout the experiment. RESULTS: Median difference in weight between the animals of each pair was 67% (range: 11–108). All animals could be successfully oxygenated and ventilated for 6 hours through manipulation of the ventilator and the DuplicARⓇ device, despite significant discrepancies in body size and weight. Mean PaCO(2) in arterial blood was 42.1 ± 4.4 mmHg, mean PaO(2) was 162.8 ± 46.8 mmHg, and mean oxygen saturation was 98 ± 1.3%. End-tidal CO(2) values showed no statistically significant difference among subjects of each pair. Mean difference in arterial PaCO(2) measured at the same time in both animals of each pair was 4.8 ± 3 mmHg, reflecting the ability of the device to ventilate each animal according to its particular requirements. Independent management of PEEP was achieved by manipulation of the device controllers. CONCLUSION: It is possible to ventilate two lung-healthy animals with a single ventilator according to each one's needs through manipulation of both the ventilator and the DuplicARⓇ device. This gives this device the potential to expand local ventilators surge capacity during disasters or pandemics until emergency supplies can be delivered from central stockpiles.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7774300
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Hindawi
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77743002021-01-14 A New Medical Device to Provide Independent Ventilation to Two Subjects Using a Single Ventilator: Evaluation in Lung-Healthy Pigs Lugones, Ignacio Orofino Giambastiani, Roberto Robledo, Oscar Marcos, Martín Mouly, Javier Gallo, Agustín Laulhé, Verónica Biancolini, María Fernanda Anesthesiol Res Pract Research Article BACKGROUND: The global crisis situation caused by SARS-CoV-2 has created an explosive demand for ventilators, which cannot be met even in developed countries. Designing a simple and inexpensive device with the ability to increase the number of patients that can be connected to existing ventilators would have a major impact on the number of lives that could be saved. We conducted a study to determine whether two pigs with significant differences in size and weight could be ventilated simultaneously using a single ventilator connected to a new medical device called DuplicARⓇ. METHODS: Six pigs (median weight 12 kg, range 9–25 kg) were connected in pairs to a single ventilator using the new device for 6 hours. Both the ventilator and the device were manipulated throughout the experiment according to the needs of each animal. Tidal volume and positive end-expiratory pressure were individually controlled with the device. Primary and secondary outcome variables were defined to assess ventilation and hemodynamics in all animals throughout the experiment. RESULTS: Median difference in weight between the animals of each pair was 67% (range: 11–108). All animals could be successfully oxygenated and ventilated for 6 hours through manipulation of the ventilator and the DuplicARⓇ device, despite significant discrepancies in body size and weight. Mean PaCO(2) in arterial blood was 42.1 ± 4.4 mmHg, mean PaO(2) was 162.8 ± 46.8 mmHg, and mean oxygen saturation was 98 ± 1.3%. End-tidal CO(2) values showed no statistically significant difference among subjects of each pair. Mean difference in arterial PaCO(2) measured at the same time in both animals of each pair was 4.8 ± 3 mmHg, reflecting the ability of the device to ventilate each animal according to its particular requirements. Independent management of PEEP was achieved by manipulation of the device controllers. CONCLUSION: It is possible to ventilate two lung-healthy animals with a single ventilator according to each one's needs through manipulation of both the ventilator and the DuplicARⓇ device. This gives this device the potential to expand local ventilators surge capacity during disasters or pandemics until emergency supplies can be delivered from central stockpiles. Hindawi 2020-12-30 /pmc/articles/PMC7774300/ /pubmed/33456461 http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8866806 Text en Copyright © 2020 Ignacio Lugones et al. https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Lugones, Ignacio
Orofino Giambastiani, Roberto
Robledo, Oscar
Marcos, Martín
Mouly, Javier
Gallo, Agustín
Laulhé, Verónica
Biancolini, María Fernanda
A New Medical Device to Provide Independent Ventilation to Two Subjects Using a Single Ventilator: Evaluation in Lung-Healthy Pigs
title A New Medical Device to Provide Independent Ventilation to Two Subjects Using a Single Ventilator: Evaluation in Lung-Healthy Pigs
title_full A New Medical Device to Provide Independent Ventilation to Two Subjects Using a Single Ventilator: Evaluation in Lung-Healthy Pigs
title_fullStr A New Medical Device to Provide Independent Ventilation to Two Subjects Using a Single Ventilator: Evaluation in Lung-Healthy Pigs
title_full_unstemmed A New Medical Device to Provide Independent Ventilation to Two Subjects Using a Single Ventilator: Evaluation in Lung-Healthy Pigs
title_short A New Medical Device to Provide Independent Ventilation to Two Subjects Using a Single Ventilator: Evaluation in Lung-Healthy Pigs
title_sort new medical device to provide independent ventilation to two subjects using a single ventilator: evaluation in lung-healthy pigs
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7774300/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33456461
http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2020/8866806
work_keys_str_mv AT lugonesignacio anewmedicaldevicetoprovideindependentventilationtotwosubjectsusingasingleventilatorevaluationinlunghealthypigs
AT orofinogiambastianiroberto anewmedicaldevicetoprovideindependentventilationtotwosubjectsusingasingleventilatorevaluationinlunghealthypigs
AT robledooscar anewmedicaldevicetoprovideindependentventilationtotwosubjectsusingasingleventilatorevaluationinlunghealthypigs
AT marcosmartin anewmedicaldevicetoprovideindependentventilationtotwosubjectsusingasingleventilatorevaluationinlunghealthypigs
AT moulyjavier anewmedicaldevicetoprovideindependentventilationtotwosubjectsusingasingleventilatorevaluationinlunghealthypigs
AT galloagustin anewmedicaldevicetoprovideindependentventilationtotwosubjectsusingasingleventilatorevaluationinlunghealthypigs
AT laulheveronica anewmedicaldevicetoprovideindependentventilationtotwosubjectsusingasingleventilatorevaluationinlunghealthypigs
AT biancolinimariafernanda anewmedicaldevicetoprovideindependentventilationtotwosubjectsusingasingleventilatorevaluationinlunghealthypigs
AT lugonesignacio newmedicaldevicetoprovideindependentventilationtotwosubjectsusingasingleventilatorevaluationinlunghealthypigs
AT orofinogiambastianiroberto newmedicaldevicetoprovideindependentventilationtotwosubjectsusingasingleventilatorevaluationinlunghealthypigs
AT robledooscar newmedicaldevicetoprovideindependentventilationtotwosubjectsusingasingleventilatorevaluationinlunghealthypigs
AT marcosmartin newmedicaldevicetoprovideindependentventilationtotwosubjectsusingasingleventilatorevaluationinlunghealthypigs
AT moulyjavier newmedicaldevicetoprovideindependentventilationtotwosubjectsusingasingleventilatorevaluationinlunghealthypigs
AT galloagustin newmedicaldevicetoprovideindependentventilationtotwosubjectsusingasingleventilatorevaluationinlunghealthypigs
AT laulheveronica newmedicaldevicetoprovideindependentventilationtotwosubjectsusingasingleventilatorevaluationinlunghealthypigs
AT biancolinimariafernanda newmedicaldevicetoprovideindependentventilationtotwosubjectsusingasingleventilatorevaluationinlunghealthypigs