Cargando…
Generational Differences in Faculty and Student Comfort With Technology Use
BACKGROUND: Navigating through online education courses continues to be a struggle for some nursing students. At the same time, integrating technology into online courses can be difficult for nursing faculty. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess faculty technology integration practices,...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
SAGE Publications
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7774396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33415296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2377960820941394 |
_version_ | 1783630256803938304 |
---|---|
author | Culp-Roche, Amanda Hampton, Debra Hensley, Angie Wilson, Jessica Thaxton-Wiggins, Amanda Otts, Jo Ann Fruh, Sharon Moser, Debra K. |
author_facet | Culp-Roche, Amanda Hampton, Debra Hensley, Angie Wilson, Jessica Thaxton-Wiggins, Amanda Otts, Jo Ann Fruh, Sharon Moser, Debra K. |
author_sort | Culp-Roche, Amanda |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Navigating through online education courses continues to be a struggle for some nursing students. At the same time, integrating technology into online courses can be difficult for nursing faculty. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess faculty technology integration practices, student attitudes about technology use, and generational differences related to faculty and student technology use. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional survey design was used to obtain data for this study. RESULTS: Integration of technology into online courses and student attitudes about technology use were not significantly different by generation. Faculty and students from the Baby Boomer and Generation X reported less comfort using technology and higher levels of anxiety using technology than did individuals from Generation Y. CONCLUSION: Significant generational variations were not noted in relation to technology integration into courses and overall student attitudes about technology in this study, but differences were noted in relation to comfort with use of technology and anxiety when using technology. Student learning outcomes and satisfaction with learning may be influenced by the student’s comfort using technology and faculty’s confidence in integrating and using technology to provide online instruction. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7774396 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | SAGE Publications |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77743962021-01-06 Generational Differences in Faculty and Student Comfort With Technology Use Culp-Roche, Amanda Hampton, Debra Hensley, Angie Wilson, Jessica Thaxton-Wiggins, Amanda Otts, Jo Ann Fruh, Sharon Moser, Debra K. SAGE Open Nurs Original Research Article BACKGROUND: Navigating through online education courses continues to be a struggle for some nursing students. At the same time, integrating technology into online courses can be difficult for nursing faculty. PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to assess faculty technology integration practices, student attitudes about technology use, and generational differences related to faculty and student technology use. METHODS: A descriptive cross-sectional survey design was used to obtain data for this study. RESULTS: Integration of technology into online courses and student attitudes about technology use were not significantly different by generation. Faculty and students from the Baby Boomer and Generation X reported less comfort using technology and higher levels of anxiety using technology than did individuals from Generation Y. CONCLUSION: Significant generational variations were not noted in relation to technology integration into courses and overall student attitudes about technology in this study, but differences were noted in relation to comfort with use of technology and anxiety when using technology. Student learning outcomes and satisfaction with learning may be influenced by the student’s comfort using technology and faculty’s confidence in integrating and using technology to provide online instruction. SAGE Publications 2020-07-15 /pmc/articles/PMC7774396/ /pubmed/33415296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2377960820941394 Text en © The Author(s) 2020 https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/ Creative Commons Non Commercial CC BY-NC: This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/) which permits non-commercial use, reproduction and distribution of the work without further permission provided the original work is attributed as specified on the SAGE and Open Access pages (https://us.sagepub.com/en-us/nam/open-access-at-sage). |
spellingShingle | Original Research Article Culp-Roche, Amanda Hampton, Debra Hensley, Angie Wilson, Jessica Thaxton-Wiggins, Amanda Otts, Jo Ann Fruh, Sharon Moser, Debra K. Generational Differences in Faculty and Student Comfort With Technology Use |
title | Generational Differences in Faculty and Student Comfort With
Technology Use |
title_full | Generational Differences in Faculty and Student Comfort With
Technology Use |
title_fullStr | Generational Differences in Faculty and Student Comfort With
Technology Use |
title_full_unstemmed | Generational Differences in Faculty and Student Comfort With
Technology Use |
title_short | Generational Differences in Faculty and Student Comfort With
Technology Use |
title_sort | generational differences in faculty and student comfort with
technology use |
topic | Original Research Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7774396/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33415296 http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2377960820941394 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT culprocheamanda generationaldifferencesinfacultyandstudentcomfortwithtechnologyuse AT hamptondebra generationaldifferencesinfacultyandstudentcomfortwithtechnologyuse AT hensleyangie generationaldifferencesinfacultyandstudentcomfortwithtechnologyuse AT wilsonjessica generationaldifferencesinfacultyandstudentcomfortwithtechnologyuse AT thaxtonwigginsamanda generationaldifferencesinfacultyandstudentcomfortwithtechnologyuse AT ottsjoann generationaldifferencesinfacultyandstudentcomfortwithtechnologyuse AT fruhsharon generationaldifferencesinfacultyandstudentcomfortwithtechnologyuse AT moserdebrak generationaldifferencesinfacultyandstudentcomfortwithtechnologyuse |