Cargando…
Creativity and its determinants among medical students
INTRODUCTION: The ultimate goal of education at all levels is the ability to generate and foster students’ creativity. This study aimed at determining and comparing creativity and its influencing factors among medical students. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study conducted in 2019, 7...
Autores principales: | , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Wolters Kluwer - Medknow
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7774634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33426124 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_279_20 |
_version_ | 1783630308595204096 |
---|---|
author | Amiri, Mohammad Khosravi, Ahmad Chaman, Reza Sadeghi, Zakieh Raei, Mehdi |
author_facet | Amiri, Mohammad Khosravi, Ahmad Chaman, Reza Sadeghi, Zakieh Raei, Mehdi |
author_sort | Amiri, Mohammad |
collection | PubMed |
description | INTRODUCTION: The ultimate goal of education at all levels is the ability to generate and foster students’ creativity. This study aimed at determining and comparing creativity and its influencing factors among medical students. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study conducted in 2019, 720 medical students in Shahroud public and private universities were selected and studied through stratified cluster random sampling. Data were collected using the Guilford Creativity Questionnaire. The data were analyzed using Chi-square, Pearson correlation coefficient, t-test, and multiple logistic regression with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: The mean creativity score of the students was 131.4 ± 13.8. The mean creativity scores on the fluency, elaboration, originality, and flexibility dimensions were 49.2 ± 5.3, 22.1 ± 3.4, 34.8 ± 4.7, and 25.4 ± 3.5, respectively. In terms of creativity levels, 75.2% of the students (n = 542) had moderate creativity and 23.8% (n = 171) had high creativity. A significant relationship was observed between creativity and educational level (P = 0.006). Multiple logistic regression results showed that educational level with an odds ratio of 0.59 was associated with a decreased chance of creativity. CONCLUSION: Most of the students had moderate creativity. Moreover, among the factors examined in this study, variables other than the field of the study and educational level had no significant effect on students’ creativity. Therefore, using collaborative and cooperative learning and problem-based learning strategies, teachers’ critical thinking styles, establishing teamwork groups, concept mapping, and using innovative and creative teaching methods can help to enhance students’ creativity. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7774634 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Wolters Kluwer - Medknow |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77746342021-01-07 Creativity and its determinants among medical students Amiri, Mohammad Khosravi, Ahmad Chaman, Reza Sadeghi, Zakieh Raei, Mehdi J Educ Health Promot Original Article INTRODUCTION: The ultimate goal of education at all levels is the ability to generate and foster students’ creativity. This study aimed at determining and comparing creativity and its influencing factors among medical students. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: In this cross-sectional study conducted in 2019, 720 medical students in Shahroud public and private universities were selected and studied through stratified cluster random sampling. Data were collected using the Guilford Creativity Questionnaire. The data were analyzed using Chi-square, Pearson correlation coefficient, t-test, and multiple logistic regression with a significance level of 0.05. RESULTS: The mean creativity score of the students was 131.4 ± 13.8. The mean creativity scores on the fluency, elaboration, originality, and flexibility dimensions were 49.2 ± 5.3, 22.1 ± 3.4, 34.8 ± 4.7, and 25.4 ± 3.5, respectively. In terms of creativity levels, 75.2% of the students (n = 542) had moderate creativity and 23.8% (n = 171) had high creativity. A significant relationship was observed between creativity and educational level (P = 0.006). Multiple logistic regression results showed that educational level with an odds ratio of 0.59 was associated with a decreased chance of creativity. CONCLUSION: Most of the students had moderate creativity. Moreover, among the factors examined in this study, variables other than the field of the study and educational level had no significant effect on students’ creativity. Therefore, using collaborative and cooperative learning and problem-based learning strategies, teachers’ critical thinking styles, establishing teamwork groups, concept mapping, and using innovative and creative teaching methods can help to enhance students’ creativity. Wolters Kluwer - Medknow 2020-11-26 /pmc/articles/PMC7774634/ /pubmed/33426124 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_279_20 Text en Copyright: © 2020 Journal of Education and Health Promotion http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/4.0 This is an open access journal, and articles are distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 License, which allows others to remix, tweak, and build upon the work non-commercially, as long as appropriate credit is given and the new creations are licensed under the identical terms. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Amiri, Mohammad Khosravi, Ahmad Chaman, Reza Sadeghi, Zakieh Raei, Mehdi Creativity and its determinants among medical students |
title | Creativity and its determinants among medical students |
title_full | Creativity and its determinants among medical students |
title_fullStr | Creativity and its determinants among medical students |
title_full_unstemmed | Creativity and its determinants among medical students |
title_short | Creativity and its determinants among medical students |
title_sort | creativity and its determinants among medical students |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7774634/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33426124 http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/jehp.jehp_279_20 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT amirimohammad creativityanditsdeterminantsamongmedicalstudents AT khosraviahmad creativityanditsdeterminantsamongmedicalstudents AT chamanreza creativityanditsdeterminantsamongmedicalstudents AT sadeghizakieh creativityanditsdeterminantsamongmedicalstudents AT raeimehdi creativityanditsdeterminantsamongmedicalstudents |