Cargando…

Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of ascending, descending and mixed types of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the non‐endemic areas of china: A propensity score matching analysis

PURPOSE: To compare the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with ascending type (type A), descending type (type D), and mixed type (type AD) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in non‐endemic areas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort included 628 patients diagnosed with type A, t...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Fan, Yixin, Guan, Wenqiang, Huang, Rui, Lin, Stefan (YUJIE), Song, Yanqiong, Lu, Shun, Kang, Le, Yang, Qin, Lang, Jinyi, Zhang, Peng
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7774743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33058559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3537
_version_ 1783630326805823488
author Fan, Yixin
Guan, Wenqiang
Huang, Rui
Lin, Stefan (YUJIE)
Song, Yanqiong
Lu, Shun
Kang, Le
Yang, Qin
Lang, Jinyi
Zhang, Peng
author_facet Fan, Yixin
Guan, Wenqiang
Huang, Rui
Lin, Stefan (YUJIE)
Song, Yanqiong
Lu, Shun
Kang, Le
Yang, Qin
Lang, Jinyi
Zhang, Peng
author_sort Fan, Yixin
collection PubMed
description PURPOSE: To compare the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with ascending type (type A), descending type (type D), and mixed type (type AD) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in non‐endemic areas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort included 628 patients diagnosed with type A, type D, and type AD of NPC between January 2009 and December 2014. Type A was defined as T(3‐4 )N(0‐1), type D as T(0‐1 )N(2‐3), and type AD as T(3‐4 )N(2‐3). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance clinical factors and match patients. Kaplan‐Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the impact of different NPC types on survival outcomes. RESULTS: There were 145 patients with type A, 194 with type D, and 289 with type AD. However, after PSM, there were only 130 patients with each type. Compared with patients with type A, those with type D had lower 5‐year disease‐specific survival (96.9% vs 91.5%) and distant metastasis‐free survival (92.3% vs 77.7%) and higher local relapse‐free survival (88.5% vs 96.9%) (p < 0.05 for all). Patients with type AD may have an increased risk of disease progression (progression‐free survival, 56.9% vs 74.6% and 66.2%) and death (overall survival [OS], 76.9% vs 85.4% and 85.4%) (p < 0.05 for all) compared to patients with the other two types of tumors. We further analyzed the metastasis trend. Similar metastasis patterns were observed in types AD and D, and types AD and A had similar recurrence trends. The mortality rate of patients with types AD and D in the first 3 years after metastasis was remarkably higher than that of patients with type A. CONCLUSIONS: In non‐endemic areas of China, metastases and recurrence patterns differed across tumor types. Type AD has the worst OS, and the clinical process is more radical. Type D has a lower recurrence rate, higher metastasis, and disease‐related mortality rates, and poorer prognosis after metastasis than type A.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7774743
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher John Wiley and Sons Inc.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77747432021-01-05 Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of ascending, descending and mixed types of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the non‐endemic areas of china: A propensity score matching analysis Fan, Yixin Guan, Wenqiang Huang, Rui Lin, Stefan (YUJIE) Song, Yanqiong Lu, Shun Kang, Le Yang, Qin Lang, Jinyi Zhang, Peng Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research PURPOSE: To compare the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with ascending type (type A), descending type (type D), and mixed type (type AD) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in non‐endemic areas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort included 628 patients diagnosed with type A, type D, and type AD of NPC between January 2009 and December 2014. Type A was defined as T(3‐4 )N(0‐1), type D as T(0‐1 )N(2‐3), and type AD as T(3‐4 )N(2‐3). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance clinical factors and match patients. Kaplan‐Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the impact of different NPC types on survival outcomes. RESULTS: There were 145 patients with type A, 194 with type D, and 289 with type AD. However, after PSM, there were only 130 patients with each type. Compared with patients with type A, those with type D had lower 5‐year disease‐specific survival (96.9% vs 91.5%) and distant metastasis‐free survival (92.3% vs 77.7%) and higher local relapse‐free survival (88.5% vs 96.9%) (p < 0.05 for all). Patients with type AD may have an increased risk of disease progression (progression‐free survival, 56.9% vs 74.6% and 66.2%) and death (overall survival [OS], 76.9% vs 85.4% and 85.4%) (p < 0.05 for all) compared to patients with the other two types of tumors. We further analyzed the metastasis trend. Similar metastasis patterns were observed in types AD and D, and types AD and A had similar recurrence trends. The mortality rate of patients with types AD and D in the first 3 years after metastasis was remarkably higher than that of patients with type A. CONCLUSIONS: In non‐endemic areas of China, metastases and recurrence patterns differed across tumor types. Type AD has the worst OS, and the clinical process is more radical. Type D has a lower recurrence rate, higher metastasis, and disease‐related mortality rates, and poorer prognosis after metastasis than type A. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7774743/ /pubmed/33058559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3537 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Clinical Cancer Research
Fan, Yixin
Guan, Wenqiang
Huang, Rui
Lin, Stefan (YUJIE)
Song, Yanqiong
Lu, Shun
Kang, Le
Yang, Qin
Lang, Jinyi
Zhang, Peng
Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of ascending, descending and mixed types of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the non‐endemic areas of china: A propensity score matching analysis
title Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of ascending, descending and mixed types of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the non‐endemic areas of china: A propensity score matching analysis
title_full Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of ascending, descending and mixed types of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the non‐endemic areas of china: A propensity score matching analysis
title_fullStr Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of ascending, descending and mixed types of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the non‐endemic areas of china: A propensity score matching analysis
title_full_unstemmed Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of ascending, descending and mixed types of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the non‐endemic areas of china: A propensity score matching analysis
title_short Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of ascending, descending and mixed types of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the non‐endemic areas of china: A propensity score matching analysis
title_sort clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of ascending, descending and mixed types of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the non‐endemic areas of china: a propensity score matching analysis
topic Clinical Cancer Research
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7774743/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33058559
http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3537
work_keys_str_mv AT fanyixin clinicalcharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesofascendingdescendingandmixedtypesofnasopharyngealcarcinomainthenonendemicareasofchinaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT guanwenqiang clinicalcharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesofascendingdescendingandmixedtypesofnasopharyngealcarcinomainthenonendemicareasofchinaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT huangrui clinicalcharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesofascendingdescendingandmixedtypesofnasopharyngealcarcinomainthenonendemicareasofchinaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT linstefanyujie clinicalcharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesofascendingdescendingandmixedtypesofnasopharyngealcarcinomainthenonendemicareasofchinaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT songyanqiong clinicalcharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesofascendingdescendingandmixedtypesofnasopharyngealcarcinomainthenonendemicareasofchinaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT lushun clinicalcharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesofascendingdescendingandmixedtypesofnasopharyngealcarcinomainthenonendemicareasofchinaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT kangle clinicalcharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesofascendingdescendingandmixedtypesofnasopharyngealcarcinomainthenonendemicareasofchinaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT yangqin clinicalcharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesofascendingdescendingandmixedtypesofnasopharyngealcarcinomainthenonendemicareasofchinaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT langjinyi clinicalcharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesofascendingdescendingandmixedtypesofnasopharyngealcarcinomainthenonendemicareasofchinaapropensityscorematchinganalysis
AT zhangpeng clinicalcharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesofascendingdescendingandmixedtypesofnasopharyngealcarcinomainthenonendemicareasofchinaapropensityscorematchinganalysis