Cargando…
Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of ascending, descending and mixed types of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the non‐endemic areas of china: A propensity score matching analysis
PURPOSE: To compare the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with ascending type (type A), descending type (type D), and mixed type (type AD) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in non‐endemic areas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort included 628 patients diagnosed with type A, t...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
John Wiley and Sons Inc.
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7774743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33058559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3537 |
_version_ | 1783630326805823488 |
---|---|
author | Fan, Yixin Guan, Wenqiang Huang, Rui Lin, Stefan (YUJIE) Song, Yanqiong Lu, Shun Kang, Le Yang, Qin Lang, Jinyi Zhang, Peng |
author_facet | Fan, Yixin Guan, Wenqiang Huang, Rui Lin, Stefan (YUJIE) Song, Yanqiong Lu, Shun Kang, Le Yang, Qin Lang, Jinyi Zhang, Peng |
author_sort | Fan, Yixin |
collection | PubMed |
description | PURPOSE: To compare the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with ascending type (type A), descending type (type D), and mixed type (type AD) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in non‐endemic areas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort included 628 patients diagnosed with type A, type D, and type AD of NPC between January 2009 and December 2014. Type A was defined as T(3‐4 )N(0‐1), type D as T(0‐1 )N(2‐3), and type AD as T(3‐4 )N(2‐3). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance clinical factors and match patients. Kaplan‐Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the impact of different NPC types on survival outcomes. RESULTS: There were 145 patients with type A, 194 with type D, and 289 with type AD. However, after PSM, there were only 130 patients with each type. Compared with patients with type A, those with type D had lower 5‐year disease‐specific survival (96.9% vs 91.5%) and distant metastasis‐free survival (92.3% vs 77.7%) and higher local relapse‐free survival (88.5% vs 96.9%) (p < 0.05 for all). Patients with type AD may have an increased risk of disease progression (progression‐free survival, 56.9% vs 74.6% and 66.2%) and death (overall survival [OS], 76.9% vs 85.4% and 85.4%) (p < 0.05 for all) compared to patients with the other two types of tumors. We further analyzed the metastasis trend. Similar metastasis patterns were observed in types AD and D, and types AD and A had similar recurrence trends. The mortality rate of patients with types AD and D in the first 3 years after metastasis was remarkably higher than that of patients with type A. CONCLUSIONS: In non‐endemic areas of China, metastases and recurrence patterns differed across tumor types. Type AD has the worst OS, and the clinical process is more radical. Type D has a lower recurrence rate, higher metastasis, and disease‐related mortality rates, and poorer prognosis after metastasis than type A. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7774743 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | John Wiley and Sons Inc. |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77747432021-01-05 Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of ascending, descending and mixed types of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the non‐endemic areas of china: A propensity score matching analysis Fan, Yixin Guan, Wenqiang Huang, Rui Lin, Stefan (YUJIE) Song, Yanqiong Lu, Shun Kang, Le Yang, Qin Lang, Jinyi Zhang, Peng Cancer Med Clinical Cancer Research PURPOSE: To compare the clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of patients with ascending type (type A), descending type (type D), and mixed type (type AD) of nasopharyngeal carcinoma (NPC) in non‐endemic areas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The cohort included 628 patients diagnosed with type A, type D, and type AD of NPC between January 2009 and December 2014. Type A was defined as T(3‐4 )N(0‐1), type D as T(0‐1 )N(2‐3), and type AD as T(3‐4 )N(2‐3). Propensity score matching (PSM) was performed to balance clinical factors and match patients. Kaplan‐Meier methods and Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the impact of different NPC types on survival outcomes. RESULTS: There were 145 patients with type A, 194 with type D, and 289 with type AD. However, after PSM, there were only 130 patients with each type. Compared with patients with type A, those with type D had lower 5‐year disease‐specific survival (96.9% vs 91.5%) and distant metastasis‐free survival (92.3% vs 77.7%) and higher local relapse‐free survival (88.5% vs 96.9%) (p < 0.05 for all). Patients with type AD may have an increased risk of disease progression (progression‐free survival, 56.9% vs 74.6% and 66.2%) and death (overall survival [OS], 76.9% vs 85.4% and 85.4%) (p < 0.05 for all) compared to patients with the other two types of tumors. We further analyzed the metastasis trend. Similar metastasis patterns were observed in types AD and D, and types AD and A had similar recurrence trends. The mortality rate of patients with types AD and D in the first 3 years after metastasis was remarkably higher than that of patients with type A. CONCLUSIONS: In non‐endemic areas of China, metastases and recurrence patterns differed across tumor types. Type AD has the worst OS, and the clinical process is more radical. Type D has a lower recurrence rate, higher metastasis, and disease‐related mortality rates, and poorer prognosis after metastasis than type A. John Wiley and Sons Inc. 2020-10-14 /pmc/articles/PMC7774743/ /pubmed/33058559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3537 Text en © 2020 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd. This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Clinical Cancer Research Fan, Yixin Guan, Wenqiang Huang, Rui Lin, Stefan (YUJIE) Song, Yanqiong Lu, Shun Kang, Le Yang, Qin Lang, Jinyi Zhang, Peng Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of ascending, descending and mixed types of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the non‐endemic areas of china: A propensity score matching analysis |
title | Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of ascending, descending and mixed types of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the non‐endemic areas of china: A propensity score matching analysis |
title_full | Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of ascending, descending and mixed types of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the non‐endemic areas of china: A propensity score matching analysis |
title_fullStr | Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of ascending, descending and mixed types of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the non‐endemic areas of china: A propensity score matching analysis |
title_full_unstemmed | Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of ascending, descending and mixed types of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the non‐endemic areas of china: A propensity score matching analysis |
title_short | Clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of ascending, descending and mixed types of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the non‐endemic areas of china: A propensity score matching analysis |
title_sort | clinical characteristics and survival outcomes of ascending, descending and mixed types of nasopharyngeal carcinoma in the non‐endemic areas of china: a propensity score matching analysis |
topic | Clinical Cancer Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7774743/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33058559 http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/cam4.3537 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT fanyixin clinicalcharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesofascendingdescendingandmixedtypesofnasopharyngealcarcinomainthenonendemicareasofchinaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT guanwenqiang clinicalcharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesofascendingdescendingandmixedtypesofnasopharyngealcarcinomainthenonendemicareasofchinaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT huangrui clinicalcharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesofascendingdescendingandmixedtypesofnasopharyngealcarcinomainthenonendemicareasofchinaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT linstefanyujie clinicalcharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesofascendingdescendingandmixedtypesofnasopharyngealcarcinomainthenonendemicareasofchinaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT songyanqiong clinicalcharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesofascendingdescendingandmixedtypesofnasopharyngealcarcinomainthenonendemicareasofchinaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT lushun clinicalcharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesofascendingdescendingandmixedtypesofnasopharyngealcarcinomainthenonendemicareasofchinaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT kangle clinicalcharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesofascendingdescendingandmixedtypesofnasopharyngealcarcinomainthenonendemicareasofchinaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT yangqin clinicalcharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesofascendingdescendingandmixedtypesofnasopharyngealcarcinomainthenonendemicareasofchinaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT langjinyi clinicalcharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesofascendingdescendingandmixedtypesofnasopharyngealcarcinomainthenonendemicareasofchinaapropensityscorematchinganalysis AT zhangpeng clinicalcharacteristicsandsurvivaloutcomesofascendingdescendingandmixedtypesofnasopharyngealcarcinomainthenonendemicareasofchinaapropensityscorematchinganalysis |