Cargando…
IGF1 for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children and adolescents: a reappraisal
A number of studies have evaluated the role of IGF1 measurement in the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and the best cut-off of IGF1 SDS in the diagnosis of GHD in a large cohort of short children and adolescents. One-hundred and forty-two child...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Bioscientifica Ltd
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7774770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33112822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EC-20-0347 |
_version_ | 1783630332880224256 |
---|---|
author | Ibba, Anastasia Corrias, Francesca Guzzetti, Chiara Casula, Letizia Salerno, Mariacarolina di Iorgi, Natascia Tornese, Gianluca Patti, Giuseppa Radetti, Giorgio Maghnie, Mohamad Cappa, Marco Loche, Sandro |
author_facet | Ibba, Anastasia Corrias, Francesca Guzzetti, Chiara Casula, Letizia Salerno, Mariacarolina di Iorgi, Natascia Tornese, Gianluca Patti, Giuseppa Radetti, Giorgio Maghnie, Mohamad Cappa, Marco Loche, Sandro |
author_sort | Ibba, Anastasia |
collection | PubMed |
description | A number of studies have evaluated the role of IGF1 measurement in the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and the best cut-off of IGF1 SDS in the diagnosis of GHD in a large cohort of short children and adolescents. One-hundred and forty-two children and adolescents with GHD ((63 organic/genetic (OGHD), 79 idiopathic (IGHD)) and 658 short non-GHD children (median age 10.4 years) were included in the analysis. The two groups were subdivided according to age (G1 <6, G2 6 <9, G3 9 <12, G4 ≥12) and to pubertal status. Serum IGFI was measured by the same chemiluminescence assay in all samples and expressed as age- and sex-based SDS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the optimal IGF1 SDS cut-off and the diagnostic accuracy. Median IGF1 SDS was significantly lower in the GHD than in non-GHD patients. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.69, with the best IGF1 cut-off of −1.5 SDS (sensitivity 67.61%, specificity 62.62%). The AUC was 0.75 for OGHD and 0.63 for IGHD. The accuracy was better in the pubertal (AUC = 0.81) than the prepubertal group (AUC = 0.64). In our cohort, IGF1 measurement has poor accuracy in discriminating GHD from non-GHD. Our findings confirm and reinforce the belief that IGF1 values should not be used alone in the diagnosis of GHD but should be interpreted in combination with other clinical and biochemical parameters. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7774770 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Bioscientifica Ltd |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77747702021-01-05 IGF1 for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children and adolescents: a reappraisal Ibba, Anastasia Corrias, Francesca Guzzetti, Chiara Casula, Letizia Salerno, Mariacarolina di Iorgi, Natascia Tornese, Gianluca Patti, Giuseppa Radetti, Giorgio Maghnie, Mohamad Cappa, Marco Loche, Sandro Endocr Connect Research A number of studies have evaluated the role of IGF1 measurement in the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency (GHD). This study aimed to evaluate the accuracy and the best cut-off of IGF1 SDS in the diagnosis of GHD in a large cohort of short children and adolescents. One-hundred and forty-two children and adolescents with GHD ((63 organic/genetic (OGHD), 79 idiopathic (IGHD)) and 658 short non-GHD children (median age 10.4 years) were included in the analysis. The two groups were subdivided according to age (G1 <6, G2 6 <9, G3 9 <12, G4 ≥12) and to pubertal status. Serum IGFI was measured by the same chemiluminescence assay in all samples and expressed as age- and sex-based SDS. Receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the optimal IGF1 SDS cut-off and the diagnostic accuracy. Median IGF1 SDS was significantly lower in the GHD than in non-GHD patients. The area under the curve (AUC) was 0.69, with the best IGF1 cut-off of −1.5 SDS (sensitivity 67.61%, specificity 62.62%). The AUC was 0.75 for OGHD and 0.63 for IGHD. The accuracy was better in the pubertal (AUC = 0.81) than the prepubertal group (AUC = 0.64). In our cohort, IGF1 measurement has poor accuracy in discriminating GHD from non-GHD. Our findings confirm and reinforce the belief that IGF1 values should not be used alone in the diagnosis of GHD but should be interpreted in combination with other clinical and biochemical parameters. Bioscientifica Ltd 2020-10-22 /pmc/articles/PMC7774770/ /pubmed/33112822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EC-20-0347 Text en © 2020 The authors http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) . |
spellingShingle | Research Ibba, Anastasia Corrias, Francesca Guzzetti, Chiara Casula, Letizia Salerno, Mariacarolina di Iorgi, Natascia Tornese, Gianluca Patti, Giuseppa Radetti, Giorgio Maghnie, Mohamad Cappa, Marco Loche, Sandro IGF1 for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children and adolescents: a reappraisal |
title | IGF1 for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children and adolescents: a reappraisal |
title_full | IGF1 for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children and adolescents: a reappraisal |
title_fullStr | IGF1 for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children and adolescents: a reappraisal |
title_full_unstemmed | IGF1 for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children and adolescents: a reappraisal |
title_short | IGF1 for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children and adolescents: a reappraisal |
title_sort | igf1 for the diagnosis of growth hormone deficiency in children and adolescents: a reappraisal |
topic | Research |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7774770/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33112822 http://dx.doi.org/10.1530/EC-20-0347 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT ibbaanastasia igf1forthediagnosisofgrowthhormonedeficiencyinchildrenandadolescentsareappraisal AT corriasfrancesca igf1forthediagnosisofgrowthhormonedeficiencyinchildrenandadolescentsareappraisal AT guzzettichiara igf1forthediagnosisofgrowthhormonedeficiencyinchildrenandadolescentsareappraisal AT casulaletizia igf1forthediagnosisofgrowthhormonedeficiencyinchildrenandadolescentsareappraisal AT salernomariacarolina igf1forthediagnosisofgrowthhormonedeficiencyinchildrenandadolescentsareappraisal AT diiorginatascia igf1forthediagnosisofgrowthhormonedeficiencyinchildrenandadolescentsareappraisal AT tornesegianluca igf1forthediagnosisofgrowthhormonedeficiencyinchildrenandadolescentsareappraisal AT pattigiuseppa igf1forthediagnosisofgrowthhormonedeficiencyinchildrenandadolescentsareappraisal AT radettigiorgio igf1forthediagnosisofgrowthhormonedeficiencyinchildrenandadolescentsareappraisal AT maghniemohamad igf1forthediagnosisofgrowthhormonedeficiencyinchildrenandadolescentsareappraisal AT cappamarco igf1forthediagnosisofgrowthhormonedeficiencyinchildrenandadolescentsareappraisal AT lochesandro igf1forthediagnosisofgrowthhormonedeficiencyinchildrenandadolescentsareappraisal |