Cargando…

Virologic and immunologic outcomes of treatment with integrase inhibitors in a real-world setting: The RESPOND cohort consortium

OBJECTIVES: To compare virologic and immunologic outcomes of integrase inhibitor (INSTI)-containing, contemporary boosted protease inhibitor (PI/b)-containing and non-nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-containing regimens in a real-life setting. METHODS: Using logistic regression, vi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Neesgaard, Bastian, Mocroft, Amanda, Zangerle, Robert, Wit, Ferdinand, Lampe, Fiona, Günthard, Huldrych F., Necsoi, Coca, Law, Matthew, Mussini, Cristina, Castagna, Antonella, Monforte, Antonella d’Arminio, Pradier, Christian, Chkhartisvilli, Nikoloz, Reyes-Uruena, Juliana, Vehreschild, Jörg Janne, Wasmuth, Jan-Christian, Sönnerborg, Anders, Stephan, Christoph, Greenberg, Lauren, Llibre, Josep M., Volny-Anne, Alain, Peters, Lars, Pelchen-Matthews, Annegret, Vannappagari, Vani, Gallant, Joel, Rieger, Armin, Youle, Mike, Braun, Dominique, De Wit, Stephane, Petoumenos, Kathy, Borghi, Vanni, Spagnuolo, Vincenzo, Tsertsvadze, Tengiz, Lundgren, Jens, Ryom, Lene
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Public Library of Science 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7774984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33382756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243625
_version_ 1783630377251766272
author Neesgaard, Bastian
Mocroft, Amanda
Zangerle, Robert
Wit, Ferdinand
Lampe, Fiona
Günthard, Huldrych F.
Necsoi, Coca
Law, Matthew
Mussini, Cristina
Castagna, Antonella
Monforte, Antonella d’Arminio
Pradier, Christian
Chkhartisvilli, Nikoloz
Reyes-Uruena, Juliana
Vehreschild, Jörg Janne
Wasmuth, Jan-Christian
Sönnerborg, Anders
Stephan, Christoph
Greenberg, Lauren
Llibre, Josep M.
Volny-Anne, Alain
Peters, Lars
Pelchen-Matthews, Annegret
Vannappagari, Vani
Gallant, Joel
Rieger, Armin
Youle, Mike
Braun, Dominique
De Wit, Stephane
Petoumenos, Kathy
Borghi, Vanni
Spagnuolo, Vincenzo
Tsertsvadze, Tengiz
Lundgren, Jens
Ryom, Lene
author_facet Neesgaard, Bastian
Mocroft, Amanda
Zangerle, Robert
Wit, Ferdinand
Lampe, Fiona
Günthard, Huldrych F.
Necsoi, Coca
Law, Matthew
Mussini, Cristina
Castagna, Antonella
Monforte, Antonella d’Arminio
Pradier, Christian
Chkhartisvilli, Nikoloz
Reyes-Uruena, Juliana
Vehreschild, Jörg Janne
Wasmuth, Jan-Christian
Sönnerborg, Anders
Stephan, Christoph
Greenberg, Lauren
Llibre, Josep M.
Volny-Anne, Alain
Peters, Lars
Pelchen-Matthews, Annegret
Vannappagari, Vani
Gallant, Joel
Rieger, Armin
Youle, Mike
Braun, Dominique
De Wit, Stephane
Petoumenos, Kathy
Borghi, Vanni
Spagnuolo, Vincenzo
Tsertsvadze, Tengiz
Lundgren, Jens
Ryom, Lene
author_sort Neesgaard, Bastian
collection PubMed
description OBJECTIVES: To compare virologic and immunologic outcomes of integrase inhibitor (INSTI)-containing, contemporary boosted protease inhibitor (PI/b)-containing and non-nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-containing regimens in a real-life setting. METHODS: Using logistic regression, virologic and immunologic outcomes of INSTI use were compared to outcomes of PI/b or NNRTI treatment 12 months after treatment start or switch, for participants in the RESPOND cohort consortium. A composite treatment outcome (cTO) was used, defining success as viral load (VL) <200 copies/mL and failure as at least one of: VL ≥200 copies/mL, unknown VL in the time window, any changes of antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen, AIDS, or death. In addition, on-treatment analysis including only individuals with known VL and no regimen changes was performed. Favorable immunologic response was defined as a 25% increase in CD4 count or as reaching ≥750 CD4 cells/μL. RESULTS: Between January 2012 and January 2019, 13,703 (33.0% ART-naïve) individuals were included, of whom 7,147 started/switched to a regimen with an INSTI, 3,102 to a PI/b and 3,454 to an NNRTI-containing regimen. The main reason for cTO failure in all treatment groups were changes in ART regimen. Compared to INSTIs, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of cTO success was significantly lower for PI/b (0.74 [95% confidence interval, CI 0.67–0.82], p <0.001), but similar for NNRTIs (1.07 [CI 0.97–1.17], p = 0.11). On-treatment analysis and sensitivity analyses using a VL cut-off of 50 copies/mL were consistent. Compared to INSTIs, the aORs of a 25% increase in CD4 count were lower for NNRTIs (0.80 [CI 0.71–0.91], p<0.001) and PI/b (0.87 [CI 0.76–0.99], p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: In this large analysis of a real-world population, cTO and on-treatment success were similar between INSTIs and NNRTIs, but lower for PI/b, though residual confounding cannot be fully excluded. Obtaining favorable immunologic outcomes were more likely for INSTIs than the other drug classes.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7774984
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Public Library of Science
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77749842021-01-11 Virologic and immunologic outcomes of treatment with integrase inhibitors in a real-world setting: The RESPOND cohort consortium Neesgaard, Bastian Mocroft, Amanda Zangerle, Robert Wit, Ferdinand Lampe, Fiona Günthard, Huldrych F. Necsoi, Coca Law, Matthew Mussini, Cristina Castagna, Antonella Monforte, Antonella d’Arminio Pradier, Christian Chkhartisvilli, Nikoloz Reyes-Uruena, Juliana Vehreschild, Jörg Janne Wasmuth, Jan-Christian Sönnerborg, Anders Stephan, Christoph Greenberg, Lauren Llibre, Josep M. Volny-Anne, Alain Peters, Lars Pelchen-Matthews, Annegret Vannappagari, Vani Gallant, Joel Rieger, Armin Youle, Mike Braun, Dominique De Wit, Stephane Petoumenos, Kathy Borghi, Vanni Spagnuolo, Vincenzo Tsertsvadze, Tengiz Lundgren, Jens Ryom, Lene PLoS One Research Article OBJECTIVES: To compare virologic and immunologic outcomes of integrase inhibitor (INSTI)-containing, contemporary boosted protease inhibitor (PI/b)-containing and non-nucleotide reverse transcriptase inhibitor (NNRTI)-containing regimens in a real-life setting. METHODS: Using logistic regression, virologic and immunologic outcomes of INSTI use were compared to outcomes of PI/b or NNRTI treatment 12 months after treatment start or switch, for participants in the RESPOND cohort consortium. A composite treatment outcome (cTO) was used, defining success as viral load (VL) <200 copies/mL and failure as at least one of: VL ≥200 copies/mL, unknown VL in the time window, any changes of antiretroviral therapy (ART) regimen, AIDS, or death. In addition, on-treatment analysis including only individuals with known VL and no regimen changes was performed. Favorable immunologic response was defined as a 25% increase in CD4 count or as reaching ≥750 CD4 cells/μL. RESULTS: Between January 2012 and January 2019, 13,703 (33.0% ART-naïve) individuals were included, of whom 7,147 started/switched to a regimen with an INSTI, 3,102 to a PI/b and 3,454 to an NNRTI-containing regimen. The main reason for cTO failure in all treatment groups were changes in ART regimen. Compared to INSTIs, the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) of cTO success was significantly lower for PI/b (0.74 [95% confidence interval, CI 0.67–0.82], p <0.001), but similar for NNRTIs (1.07 [CI 0.97–1.17], p = 0.11). On-treatment analysis and sensitivity analyses using a VL cut-off of 50 copies/mL were consistent. Compared to INSTIs, the aORs of a 25% increase in CD4 count were lower for NNRTIs (0.80 [CI 0.71–0.91], p<0.001) and PI/b (0.87 [CI 0.76–0.99], p = 0.04). CONCLUSION: In this large analysis of a real-world population, cTO and on-treatment success were similar between INSTIs and NNRTIs, but lower for PI/b, though residual confounding cannot be fully excluded. Obtaining favorable immunologic outcomes were more likely for INSTIs than the other drug classes. Public Library of Science 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7774984/ /pubmed/33382756 http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243625 Text en © 2020 Neesgaard et al http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/) , which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
spellingShingle Research Article
Neesgaard, Bastian
Mocroft, Amanda
Zangerle, Robert
Wit, Ferdinand
Lampe, Fiona
Günthard, Huldrych F.
Necsoi, Coca
Law, Matthew
Mussini, Cristina
Castagna, Antonella
Monforte, Antonella d’Arminio
Pradier, Christian
Chkhartisvilli, Nikoloz
Reyes-Uruena, Juliana
Vehreschild, Jörg Janne
Wasmuth, Jan-Christian
Sönnerborg, Anders
Stephan, Christoph
Greenberg, Lauren
Llibre, Josep M.
Volny-Anne, Alain
Peters, Lars
Pelchen-Matthews, Annegret
Vannappagari, Vani
Gallant, Joel
Rieger, Armin
Youle, Mike
Braun, Dominique
De Wit, Stephane
Petoumenos, Kathy
Borghi, Vanni
Spagnuolo, Vincenzo
Tsertsvadze, Tengiz
Lundgren, Jens
Ryom, Lene
Virologic and immunologic outcomes of treatment with integrase inhibitors in a real-world setting: The RESPOND cohort consortium
title Virologic and immunologic outcomes of treatment with integrase inhibitors in a real-world setting: The RESPOND cohort consortium
title_full Virologic and immunologic outcomes of treatment with integrase inhibitors in a real-world setting: The RESPOND cohort consortium
title_fullStr Virologic and immunologic outcomes of treatment with integrase inhibitors in a real-world setting: The RESPOND cohort consortium
title_full_unstemmed Virologic and immunologic outcomes of treatment with integrase inhibitors in a real-world setting: The RESPOND cohort consortium
title_short Virologic and immunologic outcomes of treatment with integrase inhibitors in a real-world setting: The RESPOND cohort consortium
title_sort virologic and immunologic outcomes of treatment with integrase inhibitors in a real-world setting: the respond cohort consortium
topic Research Article
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7774984/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33382756
http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0243625
work_keys_str_mv AT neesgaardbastian virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT mocroftamanda virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT zangerlerobert virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT witferdinand virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT lampefiona virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT gunthardhuldrychf virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT necsoicoca virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT lawmatthew virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT mussinicristina virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT castagnaantonella virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT monforteantonelladarminio virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT pradierchristian virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT chkhartisvillinikoloz virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT reyesuruenajuliana virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT vehreschildjorgjanne virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT wasmuthjanchristian virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT sonnerborganders virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT stephanchristoph virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT greenberglauren virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT llibrejosepm virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT volnyannealain virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT peterslars virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT pelchenmatthewsannegret virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT vannappagarivani virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT gallantjoel virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT riegerarmin virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT youlemike virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT braundominique virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT dewitstephane virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT petoumenoskathy virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT borghivanni virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT spagnuolovincenzo virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT tsertsvadzetengiz virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT lundgrenjens virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT ryomlene virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium
AT virologicandimmunologicoutcomesoftreatmentwithintegraseinhibitorsinarealworldsettingtherespondcohortconsortium