Cargando…

Evaluation of Antigenicity of Components of Tracheal Allotransplant and Effect of Immunosuppressant Regime in a Rodent Model

Background  Tracheal transplantation seems to be the logical step in the process of reconstruction of the trachea following a long-segment resection, which is usually done to treat malignant disease or benign stenosis of the airway caused by a traumatic, congenital, inflammatory, or iatrogenic lesio...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sharma, Dimpy, Iyer, Subramania, Subramaniam, Sobha, Ramu, Janarthanan, Sharma, Mohit, Nambiar, Ajit, Unni, AKK, S., Sivanarayanan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2020
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7775257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33402765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721860
_version_ 1783630440887746560
author Sharma, Dimpy
Iyer, Subramania
Subramaniam, Sobha
Ramu, Janarthanan
Sharma, Mohit
Nambiar, Ajit
Unni, AKK
S., Sivanarayanan
author_facet Sharma, Dimpy
Iyer, Subramania
Subramaniam, Sobha
Ramu, Janarthanan
Sharma, Mohit
Nambiar, Ajit
Unni, AKK
S., Sivanarayanan
author_sort Sharma, Dimpy
collection PubMed
description Background  Tracheal transplantation seems to be the logical step in the process of reconstruction of the trachea following a long-segment resection, which is usually done to treat malignant disease or benign stenosis of the airway caused by a traumatic, congenital, inflammatory, or iatrogenic lesion. Immunosuppression following transplant is essential but not ideal after oncoresection. Methods  The tracheal allografts, harvested from Sprague Dawley rats, were implanted in the Wistar strain rat. The harvested tracheal grafts were divided into groups and subgroups, based on the layers of trachea, method of decellularization, and immunosuppression. The antigenicity of different layers of trachea and the effect of various decellularization methods were studied within three time frames, that is, day 3, 9, and 15. Result  On structural analysis, the day 3 and day 15 samples showed no meaningful comparison could be made, due to extensive neutrophil infiltration in all three layers. The day 9 tracheal grafts showed loss of epithelium, with no signs of regeneration in most of the allografts. The subepithelial lymphoid infiltration was found to be severe in nonimmunosuppressed allografts. The group in which both inner and outer layers were removed showed moderate-to-severe infiltrate of lymphoid cells in all the allografts, but there was no cartilage loss, irrespective of the method of decellularization. The irradiated specimens retained the cartilage but showed extensive ischemic damage. Conclusion  Rat trachea is a good model for tracheal transplant research but not adequately sturdy to sustain mechanical debridement. Irradiation and chemical decellularization eliminates the immune response but causes intense ischemic damage. Out of the three time frames, day 9 seemed to be the best to study the immune response. To substantiate the results obtained in this study, the immunohistochemical study of the allografts is needed to be performed among a larger group of animals.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7775257
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77752572021-01-04 Evaluation of Antigenicity of Components of Tracheal Allotransplant and Effect of Immunosuppressant Regime in a Rodent Model Sharma, Dimpy Iyer, Subramania Subramaniam, Sobha Ramu, Janarthanan Sharma, Mohit Nambiar, Ajit Unni, AKK S., Sivanarayanan Indian J Plast Surg Background  Tracheal transplantation seems to be the logical step in the process of reconstruction of the trachea following a long-segment resection, which is usually done to treat malignant disease or benign stenosis of the airway caused by a traumatic, congenital, inflammatory, or iatrogenic lesion. Immunosuppression following transplant is essential but not ideal after oncoresection. Methods  The tracheal allografts, harvested from Sprague Dawley rats, were implanted in the Wistar strain rat. The harvested tracheal grafts were divided into groups and subgroups, based on the layers of trachea, method of decellularization, and immunosuppression. The antigenicity of different layers of trachea and the effect of various decellularization methods were studied within three time frames, that is, day 3, 9, and 15. Result  On structural analysis, the day 3 and day 15 samples showed no meaningful comparison could be made, due to extensive neutrophil infiltration in all three layers. The day 9 tracheal grafts showed loss of epithelium, with no signs of regeneration in most of the allografts. The subepithelial lymphoid infiltration was found to be severe in nonimmunosuppressed allografts. The group in which both inner and outer layers were removed showed moderate-to-severe infiltrate of lymphoid cells in all the allografts, but there was no cartilage loss, irrespective of the method of decellularization. The irradiated specimens retained the cartilage but showed extensive ischemic damage. Conclusion  Rat trachea is a good model for tracheal transplant research but not adequately sturdy to sustain mechanical debridement. Irradiation and chemical decellularization eliminates the immune response but causes intense ischemic damage. Out of the three time frames, day 9 seemed to be the best to study the immune response. To substantiate the results obtained in this study, the immunohistochemical study of the allografts is needed to be performed among a larger group of animals. Thieme Medical and Scientific Publishers Pvt. Ltd. 2020-12 2020-12-21 /pmc/articles/PMC7775257/ /pubmed/33402765 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721860 Text en Association of Plastic Surgeons of India. This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial-License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commercial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/). https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Sharma, Dimpy
Iyer, Subramania
Subramaniam, Sobha
Ramu, Janarthanan
Sharma, Mohit
Nambiar, Ajit
Unni, AKK
S., Sivanarayanan
Evaluation of Antigenicity of Components of Tracheal Allotransplant and Effect of Immunosuppressant Regime in a Rodent Model
title Evaluation of Antigenicity of Components of Tracheal Allotransplant and Effect of Immunosuppressant Regime in a Rodent Model
title_full Evaluation of Antigenicity of Components of Tracheal Allotransplant and Effect of Immunosuppressant Regime in a Rodent Model
title_fullStr Evaluation of Antigenicity of Components of Tracheal Allotransplant and Effect of Immunosuppressant Regime in a Rodent Model
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of Antigenicity of Components of Tracheal Allotransplant and Effect of Immunosuppressant Regime in a Rodent Model
title_short Evaluation of Antigenicity of Components of Tracheal Allotransplant and Effect of Immunosuppressant Regime in a Rodent Model
title_sort evaluation of antigenicity of components of tracheal allotransplant and effect of immunosuppressant regime in a rodent model
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7775257/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33402765
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1721860
work_keys_str_mv AT sharmadimpy evaluationofantigenicityofcomponentsoftrachealallotransplantandeffectofimmunosuppressantregimeinarodentmodel
AT iyersubramania evaluationofantigenicityofcomponentsoftrachealallotransplantandeffectofimmunosuppressantregimeinarodentmodel
AT subramaniamsobha evaluationofantigenicityofcomponentsoftrachealallotransplantandeffectofimmunosuppressantregimeinarodentmodel
AT ramujanarthanan evaluationofantigenicityofcomponentsoftrachealallotransplantandeffectofimmunosuppressantregimeinarodentmodel
AT sharmamohit evaluationofantigenicityofcomponentsoftrachealallotransplantandeffectofimmunosuppressantregimeinarodentmodel
AT nambiarajit evaluationofantigenicityofcomponentsoftrachealallotransplantandeffectofimmunosuppressantregimeinarodentmodel
AT unniakk evaluationofantigenicityofcomponentsoftrachealallotransplantandeffectofimmunosuppressantregimeinarodentmodel
AT ssivanarayanan evaluationofantigenicityofcomponentsoftrachealallotransplantandeffectofimmunosuppressantregimeinarodentmodel