Cargando…

Predictive Validity of Operationalized Criteria for the Assessment of Criminal Responsibility of Sexual Offenders With Paraphilic Disorders—A Randomized Control Trial With Mental Health and Legal Professionals

The prevention of sexual violence is a major goal of sexual health. In cases of accused sexual offenders, the assessment of diminished criminal responsibility of the accused is one of the most important procedures undertaken by experts in the German legal system. This assessment follows a two-stage...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Dobbrunz, Sascha, Daubmann, Anne, Müller, Jürgen Leo, Briken, Peer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7775361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391132
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613081
_version_ 1783630448537108480
author Dobbrunz, Sascha
Daubmann, Anne
Müller, Jürgen Leo
Briken, Peer
author_facet Dobbrunz, Sascha
Daubmann, Anne
Müller, Jürgen Leo
Briken, Peer
author_sort Dobbrunz, Sascha
collection PubMed
description The prevention of sexual violence is a major goal of sexual health. In cases of accused sexual offenders, the assessment of diminished criminal responsibility of the accused is one of the most important procedures undertaken by experts in the German legal system. This assessment follows a two-stage method assessing first the severity of a paraphilic disorder and then second criteria for or against diminished capacity. The present study examines the predictive validity of two different sets of criteria for the assessment of criminal responsibility in the context of paraphilic disorders combined with sexual offending. Two exemplary case vignettes of two suspected sexual offenders were developed to assess the criteria. For each participant, one of the two exemplary case vignettes was randomly presented. The presentation of the two different sets of criteria was also randomized, so that each participant was assigned only one of the two criteria sets to rate one of the presented cases. N = 349 participants from different professional backgrounds (mental health and legal professionals) completed their assessments and were included in the data analysis. The data were evaluated using logistic regression. Results show that the more recently published criteria set (Briken and Müller, 2014) predicts both the severity of the disorder as well as the diminished capacity twice as good as the older criteria set of Boetticher et al. (2005) currently used regularly for forensic court reports. In preliminary conclusion, the new criteria of Briken and Müller (2014) form an empirically based assessment of criminal responsibility. However, the proposed criteria cannot replace an extensive exploration of the accused person and a careful file analysis. Validity and reliability of the results are also limited due to the methodical choice of a vignette study.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7775361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77753612021-01-02 Predictive Validity of Operationalized Criteria for the Assessment of Criminal Responsibility of Sexual Offenders With Paraphilic Disorders—A Randomized Control Trial With Mental Health and Legal Professionals Dobbrunz, Sascha Daubmann, Anne Müller, Jürgen Leo Briken, Peer Front Psychol Psychology The prevention of sexual violence is a major goal of sexual health. In cases of accused sexual offenders, the assessment of diminished criminal responsibility of the accused is one of the most important procedures undertaken by experts in the German legal system. This assessment follows a two-stage method assessing first the severity of a paraphilic disorder and then second criteria for or against diminished capacity. The present study examines the predictive validity of two different sets of criteria for the assessment of criminal responsibility in the context of paraphilic disorders combined with sexual offending. Two exemplary case vignettes of two suspected sexual offenders were developed to assess the criteria. For each participant, one of the two exemplary case vignettes was randomly presented. The presentation of the two different sets of criteria was also randomized, so that each participant was assigned only one of the two criteria sets to rate one of the presented cases. N = 349 participants from different professional backgrounds (mental health and legal professionals) completed their assessments and were included in the data analysis. The data were evaluated using logistic regression. Results show that the more recently published criteria set (Briken and Müller, 2014) predicts both the severity of the disorder as well as the diminished capacity twice as good as the older criteria set of Boetticher et al. (2005) currently used regularly for forensic court reports. In preliminary conclusion, the new criteria of Briken and Müller (2014) form an empirically based assessment of criminal responsibility. However, the proposed criteria cannot replace an extensive exploration of the accused person and a careful file analysis. Validity and reliability of the results are also limited due to the methodical choice of a vignette study. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7775361/ /pubmed/33391132 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613081 Text en Copyright © 2020 Dobbrunz, Daubmann, Müller and Briken. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Psychology
Dobbrunz, Sascha
Daubmann, Anne
Müller, Jürgen Leo
Briken, Peer
Predictive Validity of Operationalized Criteria for the Assessment of Criminal Responsibility of Sexual Offenders With Paraphilic Disorders—A Randomized Control Trial With Mental Health and Legal Professionals
title Predictive Validity of Operationalized Criteria for the Assessment of Criminal Responsibility of Sexual Offenders With Paraphilic Disorders—A Randomized Control Trial With Mental Health and Legal Professionals
title_full Predictive Validity of Operationalized Criteria for the Assessment of Criminal Responsibility of Sexual Offenders With Paraphilic Disorders—A Randomized Control Trial With Mental Health and Legal Professionals
title_fullStr Predictive Validity of Operationalized Criteria for the Assessment of Criminal Responsibility of Sexual Offenders With Paraphilic Disorders—A Randomized Control Trial With Mental Health and Legal Professionals
title_full_unstemmed Predictive Validity of Operationalized Criteria for the Assessment of Criminal Responsibility of Sexual Offenders With Paraphilic Disorders—A Randomized Control Trial With Mental Health and Legal Professionals
title_short Predictive Validity of Operationalized Criteria for the Assessment of Criminal Responsibility of Sexual Offenders With Paraphilic Disorders—A Randomized Control Trial With Mental Health and Legal Professionals
title_sort predictive validity of operationalized criteria for the assessment of criminal responsibility of sexual offenders with paraphilic disorders—a randomized control trial with mental health and legal professionals
topic Psychology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7775361/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33391132
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2020.613081
work_keys_str_mv AT dobbrunzsascha predictivevalidityofoperationalizedcriteriafortheassessmentofcriminalresponsibilityofsexualoffenderswithparaphilicdisordersarandomizedcontroltrialwithmentalhealthandlegalprofessionals
AT daubmannanne predictivevalidityofoperationalizedcriteriafortheassessmentofcriminalresponsibilityofsexualoffenderswithparaphilicdisordersarandomizedcontroltrialwithmentalhealthandlegalprofessionals
AT mullerjurgenleo predictivevalidityofoperationalizedcriteriafortheassessmentofcriminalresponsibilityofsexualoffenderswithparaphilicdisordersarandomizedcontroltrialwithmentalhealthandlegalprofessionals
AT brikenpeer predictivevalidityofoperationalizedcriteriafortheassessmentofcriminalresponsibilityofsexualoffenderswithparaphilicdisordersarandomizedcontroltrialwithmentalhealthandlegalprofessionals