Cargando…

Prognostic and Predictive Value of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Prognostic Staging System in Nodal Micrometastatic Breast Cancer

INTRODUCTION: To investigate the prognostic and predictive effect of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8(th) edition pathological prognostic staging system in patients with T1-2N1micM0 breast cancer who underwent mastectomy. METHODS: Data from T1-2N1micM0 breast cancer patients who under...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Shi, Jian, Lian, Chen-Lu, Chi, Feng, Zhou, Ping, Lei, Jian, Hua, Li, Wang, Jun, He, Zhen-Yu, Wu, San-Gang
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7775531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33392071
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.570175
_version_ 1783630488285478912
author Shi, Jian
Lian, Chen-Lu
Chi, Feng
Zhou, Ping
Lei, Jian
Hua, Li
Wang, Jun
He, Zhen-Yu
Wu, San-Gang
author_facet Shi, Jian
Lian, Chen-Lu
Chi, Feng
Zhou, Ping
Lei, Jian
Hua, Li
Wang, Jun
He, Zhen-Yu
Wu, San-Gang
author_sort Shi, Jian
collection PubMed
description INTRODUCTION: To investigate the prognostic and predictive effect of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8(th) edition pathological prognostic staging system in patients with T1-2N1micM0 breast cancer who underwent mastectomy. METHODS: Data from T1-2N1micM0 breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy from 2010–2014 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. The chi-square test, binomial logistics regression, receiver-operating characteristics curve, competing-risk regression model, Cox proportional hazards regression model, and proportional hazard assumption were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: We identified 4,729 patients, including 1,062 patients were received postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). Stage change occurred in 88.2% of the patients, of which 84.4% were downstaged and 3.7% were upstaged. Patients with higher pathological prognostic stages were independently predicted to receive PMRT. The 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was 97.5, 93.7, 90.1, 86.0, and 73.5% in disease stages IA, IB, IIA, IIB, and IIIA, respectively, according to the 8(th) edition criteria (P < 0.001). The AJCC 8(th) edition demonstrated moderate discriminative ability, and it had a significantly better ability to predict the BCSS than the AJCC 7(th) edition criteria (P < 0.001). The multivariate prognostic analysis showed that the new pathological prognostic staging was an independent prognostic factor affecting the BCSS. The BCSS worsened with an increase in the stage. The PMRT did not affect the BCSS regardless of the pathological prognostic stage. Similar trends were found using the competing-risks regression model. CONCLUSIONS: The 8(th) AJCC breast cancer pathological prognostic staging system downstaged 84.4% of patients with T1-2N1micM0 disease and the survival outcome prediction with this staging system was more accurate than the AJCC 7(th) edition system. Our study does not support using the prognostic stage as a guideline to escalate of PMRT.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7775531
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77755312021-01-02 Prognostic and Predictive Value of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Prognostic Staging System in Nodal Micrometastatic Breast Cancer Shi, Jian Lian, Chen-Lu Chi, Feng Zhou, Ping Lei, Jian Hua, Li Wang, Jun He, Zhen-Yu Wu, San-Gang Front Oncol Oncology INTRODUCTION: To investigate the prognostic and predictive effect of the American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) 8(th) edition pathological prognostic staging system in patients with T1-2N1micM0 breast cancer who underwent mastectomy. METHODS: Data from T1-2N1micM0 breast cancer patients who underwent mastectomy from 2010–2014 were obtained from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results program. The chi-square test, binomial logistics regression, receiver-operating characteristics curve, competing-risk regression model, Cox proportional hazards regression model, and proportional hazard assumption were used for statistical analyses. RESULTS: We identified 4,729 patients, including 1,062 patients were received postmastectomy radiotherapy (PMRT). Stage change occurred in 88.2% of the patients, of which 84.4% were downstaged and 3.7% were upstaged. Patients with higher pathological prognostic stages were independently predicted to receive PMRT. The 5-year breast cancer-specific survival (BCSS) was 97.5, 93.7, 90.1, 86.0, and 73.5% in disease stages IA, IB, IIA, IIB, and IIIA, respectively, according to the 8(th) edition criteria (P < 0.001). The AJCC 8(th) edition demonstrated moderate discriminative ability, and it had a significantly better ability to predict the BCSS than the AJCC 7(th) edition criteria (P < 0.001). The multivariate prognostic analysis showed that the new pathological prognostic staging was an independent prognostic factor affecting the BCSS. The BCSS worsened with an increase in the stage. The PMRT did not affect the BCSS regardless of the pathological prognostic stage. Similar trends were found using the competing-risks regression model. CONCLUSIONS: The 8(th) AJCC breast cancer pathological prognostic staging system downstaged 84.4% of patients with T1-2N1micM0 disease and the survival outcome prediction with this staging system was more accurate than the AJCC 7(th) edition system. Our study does not support using the prognostic stage as a guideline to escalate of PMRT. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-18 /pmc/articles/PMC7775531/ /pubmed/33392071 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.570175 Text en Copyright © 2020 Shi, Lian, Chi, Zhou, Lei, Hua, Wang, He and Wu http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Oncology
Shi, Jian
Lian, Chen-Lu
Chi, Feng
Zhou, Ping
Lei, Jian
Hua, Li
Wang, Jun
He, Zhen-Yu
Wu, San-Gang
Prognostic and Predictive Value of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Prognostic Staging System in Nodal Micrometastatic Breast Cancer
title Prognostic and Predictive Value of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Prognostic Staging System in Nodal Micrometastatic Breast Cancer
title_full Prognostic and Predictive Value of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Prognostic Staging System in Nodal Micrometastatic Breast Cancer
title_fullStr Prognostic and Predictive Value of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Prognostic Staging System in Nodal Micrometastatic Breast Cancer
title_full_unstemmed Prognostic and Predictive Value of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Prognostic Staging System in Nodal Micrometastatic Breast Cancer
title_short Prognostic and Predictive Value of the American Joint Committee on Cancer Pathological Prognostic Staging System in Nodal Micrometastatic Breast Cancer
title_sort prognostic and predictive value of the american joint committee on cancer pathological prognostic staging system in nodal micrometastatic breast cancer
topic Oncology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7775531/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33392071
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fonc.2020.570175
work_keys_str_mv AT shijian prognosticandpredictivevalueoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerpathologicalprognosticstagingsysteminnodalmicrometastaticbreastcancer
AT lianchenlu prognosticandpredictivevalueoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerpathologicalprognosticstagingsysteminnodalmicrometastaticbreastcancer
AT chifeng prognosticandpredictivevalueoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerpathologicalprognosticstagingsysteminnodalmicrometastaticbreastcancer
AT zhouping prognosticandpredictivevalueoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerpathologicalprognosticstagingsysteminnodalmicrometastaticbreastcancer
AT leijian prognosticandpredictivevalueoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerpathologicalprognosticstagingsysteminnodalmicrometastaticbreastcancer
AT huali prognosticandpredictivevalueoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerpathologicalprognosticstagingsysteminnodalmicrometastaticbreastcancer
AT wangjun prognosticandpredictivevalueoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerpathologicalprognosticstagingsysteminnodalmicrometastaticbreastcancer
AT hezhenyu prognosticandpredictivevalueoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerpathologicalprognosticstagingsysteminnodalmicrometastaticbreastcancer
AT wusangang prognosticandpredictivevalueoftheamericanjointcommitteeoncancerpathologicalprognosticstagingsysteminnodalmicrometastaticbreastcancer