Cargando…

Effect of Glycosaminoglycan Replacement on Markers of Interstitial Cystitis In Vitro

Aims: To examine the effect of three commercial intravesical formulations of glycosaminoglycan on in vitro inflammatory models of IC/BPS to better understand there effect on specific markers of disease. Methods: Human urothelial cells (HTB-4) were cultured under four conditions in the presence or ab...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Rooney, Peadar, Ryan, Christina, McDermott, Barry J., Dev, Kapil, Pandit, Abhay, Quinlan, Leo R.
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Frontiers Media S.A. 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7775665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33390947
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.575043
_version_ 1783630516778434560
author Rooney, Peadar
Ryan, Christina
McDermott, Barry J.
Dev, Kapil
Pandit, Abhay
Quinlan, Leo R.
author_facet Rooney, Peadar
Ryan, Christina
McDermott, Barry J.
Dev, Kapil
Pandit, Abhay
Quinlan, Leo R.
author_sort Rooney, Peadar
collection PubMed
description Aims: To examine the effect of three commercial intravesical formulations of glycosaminoglycan on in vitro inflammatory models of IC/BPS to better understand there effect on specific markers of disease. Methods: Human urothelial cells (HTB-4) were cultured under four conditions in the presence or absence of commercial GAG formulations. Cells were cultured under a basal condition or pre-treated with protamine sulfate (100 ng/ml) (damages the endogenous glycosaminoglycan layer), hydrogen peroxide (1%) (a metabolic stressor) or TNFα (10 ng/ml) (creating an inflammatory environment). Each of these four culture conditions was then treated with one of three GAG formulations, CystistatⓇ, iAluRilⓇ and HyacystⓇ. Assays were then performed to examine the effect of the exogenous GAGs on cell viability, cell migration, sGAG production, cytokine and gene expression. Results: All GAG formulations were well tolerated by the HTB-4 cells and supported cell growth and migration. iAluRilⓇ was most effective at stimulating endogenous sGAG production under all conditions, increasing sGAGs by up to 15-fold. All GAG formulations significantly reduced the production of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-8 under basal conditions, while no GAG treatment suppressed cytokine production under any other condition. Only Cystistat(Ⓡ) had a significant effect on HA receptor expression, significantly increasing ICAM-1 expression at 3 h that returned to basal levels at 24 h. No GAG treatment significantly changed the expression of GAG synthesis enzymes (CSGALNACT1, CSGALNACT2) or markers of tissue remodeling (MMP2, TIMP1) and pain (COX-1/PTGS-1, NGF). Conclusions: The data presented in this study reveal that commercial intravesical formulation support cell viability and migration. In addition, the commercial GAG formulations have a mild anti-inflammatory effect in the in vitro model of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7775665
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Frontiers Media S.A.
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77756652021-01-02 Effect of Glycosaminoglycan Replacement on Markers of Interstitial Cystitis In Vitro Rooney, Peadar Ryan, Christina McDermott, Barry J. Dev, Kapil Pandit, Abhay Quinlan, Leo R. Front Pharmacol Pharmacology Aims: To examine the effect of three commercial intravesical formulations of glycosaminoglycan on in vitro inflammatory models of IC/BPS to better understand there effect on specific markers of disease. Methods: Human urothelial cells (HTB-4) were cultured under four conditions in the presence or absence of commercial GAG formulations. Cells were cultured under a basal condition or pre-treated with protamine sulfate (100 ng/ml) (damages the endogenous glycosaminoglycan layer), hydrogen peroxide (1%) (a metabolic stressor) or TNFα (10 ng/ml) (creating an inflammatory environment). Each of these four culture conditions was then treated with one of three GAG formulations, CystistatⓇ, iAluRilⓇ and HyacystⓇ. Assays were then performed to examine the effect of the exogenous GAGs on cell viability, cell migration, sGAG production, cytokine and gene expression. Results: All GAG formulations were well tolerated by the HTB-4 cells and supported cell growth and migration. iAluRilⓇ was most effective at stimulating endogenous sGAG production under all conditions, increasing sGAGs by up to 15-fold. All GAG formulations significantly reduced the production of the pro-inflammatory cytokine IL-8 under basal conditions, while no GAG treatment suppressed cytokine production under any other condition. Only Cystistat(Ⓡ) had a significant effect on HA receptor expression, significantly increasing ICAM-1 expression at 3 h that returned to basal levels at 24 h. No GAG treatment significantly changed the expression of GAG synthesis enzymes (CSGALNACT1, CSGALNACT2) or markers of tissue remodeling (MMP2, TIMP1) and pain (COX-1/PTGS-1, NGF). Conclusions: The data presented in this study reveal that commercial intravesical formulation support cell viability and migration. In addition, the commercial GAG formulations have a mild anti-inflammatory effect in the in vitro model of interstitial cystitis/bladder pain syndrome. Frontiers Media S.A. 2020-12-03 /pmc/articles/PMC7775665/ /pubmed/33390947 http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.575043 Text en Copyright © 2020 Rooney, Ryan, McDermott, Dev, Pandit and Quinlan http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.
spellingShingle Pharmacology
Rooney, Peadar
Ryan, Christina
McDermott, Barry J.
Dev, Kapil
Pandit, Abhay
Quinlan, Leo R.
Effect of Glycosaminoglycan Replacement on Markers of Interstitial Cystitis In Vitro
title Effect of Glycosaminoglycan Replacement on Markers of Interstitial Cystitis In Vitro
title_full Effect of Glycosaminoglycan Replacement on Markers of Interstitial Cystitis In Vitro
title_fullStr Effect of Glycosaminoglycan Replacement on Markers of Interstitial Cystitis In Vitro
title_full_unstemmed Effect of Glycosaminoglycan Replacement on Markers of Interstitial Cystitis In Vitro
title_short Effect of Glycosaminoglycan Replacement on Markers of Interstitial Cystitis In Vitro
title_sort effect of glycosaminoglycan replacement on markers of interstitial cystitis in vitro
topic Pharmacology
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7775665/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33390947
http://dx.doi.org/10.3389/fphar.2020.575043
work_keys_str_mv AT rooneypeadar effectofglycosaminoglycanreplacementonmarkersofinterstitialcystitisinvitro
AT ryanchristina effectofglycosaminoglycanreplacementonmarkersofinterstitialcystitisinvitro
AT mcdermottbarryj effectofglycosaminoglycanreplacementonmarkersofinterstitialcystitisinvitro
AT devkapil effectofglycosaminoglycanreplacementonmarkersofinterstitialcystitisinvitro
AT panditabhay effectofglycosaminoglycanreplacementonmarkersofinterstitialcystitisinvitro
AT quinlanleor effectofglycosaminoglycanreplacementonmarkersofinterstitialcystitisinvitro