Cargando…

Evaluation of the optical criteria for sessile serrated lesions of the colon: A prospective study on a colorectal cancer screening population

Background and study aims  We aimed to describe the presence and combination of Hazewinkelʼs optical diagnosis (OD) criteria for sessile serrated lesions (SSL), determining which lesion characteristics increase the probability of a correct OD, with a focus on diminutive lesions. Patients and methods...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bustamante-Balén, Marco, Satorres, Carla, Ramos-Soler, David, García-Campos, Maria, Alonso, Noelia, Ponce, Marta, Argüello-Viudez, Lidia, Giner, Francisco, Ferrer-Lozano, Jaime, Pons-Beltrán, Vicente
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7775808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33403231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1293-7086
_version_ 1783630549259124736
author Bustamante-Balén, Marco
Satorres, Carla
Ramos-Soler, David
García-Campos, Maria
Alonso, Noelia
Ponce, Marta
Argüello-Viudez, Lidia
Giner, Francisco
Ferrer-Lozano, Jaime
Pons-Beltrán, Vicente
author_facet Bustamante-Balén, Marco
Satorres, Carla
Ramos-Soler, David
García-Campos, Maria
Alonso, Noelia
Ponce, Marta
Argüello-Viudez, Lidia
Giner, Francisco
Ferrer-Lozano, Jaime
Pons-Beltrán, Vicente
author_sort Bustamante-Balén, Marco
collection PubMed
description Background and study aims  We aimed to describe the presence and combination of Hazewinkelʼs optical diagnosis (OD) criteria for sessile serrated lesions (SSL), determining which lesion characteristics increase the probability of a correct OD, with a focus on diminutive lesions. Patients and methods  This was a prospective study describing the presence of Hazewinkelʼs OD criteria for SSL in lesions found in consecutive CRC screening colonoscopies. The presence of each OD criterion and their diagnostic combinations in SSL, related to the lesion’s NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification category, size, and location, were described. The presence of two or more optical criteria was considered diagnostic of SSL. The OD was compared to pathology as the gold standard. Results  Seventy-nine SSLs (5.6 %) were diagnosed. Cloud-like appearance was the most prevalent OD criterion (35, 44.3 %). OD criteria were more frequently identified in NICE type 1, ≥ 10 mm, and proximal lesions. Only 26 SLLs fulfilled the OD criteria (sensitivity 32.9 %, 95 % CI 29.1 %–36.7 %). The sensitivity for diminutive SSL was 14.7 %, (95 % CI 11.9 %–17.6 %). Eighty-five lesions were optically diagnosed as SSL. However, only in 26 SSL was this the definitive diagnosis (positive predictive value 30.6 %, 95 % CI 26.9 %–34.3 %). Size > 5 mm and proximal location increased the probability of a correct diagnosis. The overall accuracy of the optical criteria was 92.0 % (95 % CI, 89.8 %–94.2 %). Conclusions  The Hazewinkelʼs optical criteria are not reliable for a positive diagnosis of SSL, particularly for diminutive lesions.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7775808
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2021
publisher Georg Thieme Verlag KG
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77758082021-01-04 Evaluation of the optical criteria for sessile serrated lesions of the colon: A prospective study on a colorectal cancer screening population Bustamante-Balén, Marco Satorres, Carla Ramos-Soler, David García-Campos, Maria Alonso, Noelia Ponce, Marta Argüello-Viudez, Lidia Giner, Francisco Ferrer-Lozano, Jaime Pons-Beltrán, Vicente Endosc Int Open Background and study aims  We aimed to describe the presence and combination of Hazewinkelʼs optical diagnosis (OD) criteria for sessile serrated lesions (SSL), determining which lesion characteristics increase the probability of a correct OD, with a focus on diminutive lesions. Patients and methods  This was a prospective study describing the presence of Hazewinkelʼs OD criteria for SSL in lesions found in consecutive CRC screening colonoscopies. The presence of each OD criterion and their diagnostic combinations in SSL, related to the lesion’s NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification category, size, and location, were described. The presence of two or more optical criteria was considered diagnostic of SSL. The OD was compared to pathology as the gold standard. Results  Seventy-nine SSLs (5.6 %) were diagnosed. Cloud-like appearance was the most prevalent OD criterion (35, 44.3 %). OD criteria were more frequently identified in NICE type 1, ≥ 10 mm, and proximal lesions. Only 26 SLLs fulfilled the OD criteria (sensitivity 32.9 %, 95 % CI 29.1 %–36.7 %). The sensitivity for diminutive SSL was 14.7 %, (95 % CI 11.9 %–17.6 %). Eighty-five lesions were optically diagnosed as SSL. However, only in 26 SSL was this the definitive diagnosis (positive predictive value 30.6 %, 95 % CI 26.9 %–34.3 %). Size > 5 mm and proximal location increased the probability of a correct diagnosis. The overall accuracy of the optical criteria was 92.0 % (95 % CI, 89.8 %–94.2 %). Conclusions  The Hazewinkelʼs optical criteria are not reliable for a positive diagnosis of SSL, particularly for diminutive lesions. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-01 2021-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7775808/ /pubmed/33403231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1293-7086 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited.
spellingShingle Bustamante-Balén, Marco
Satorres, Carla
Ramos-Soler, David
García-Campos, Maria
Alonso, Noelia
Ponce, Marta
Argüello-Viudez, Lidia
Giner, Francisco
Ferrer-Lozano, Jaime
Pons-Beltrán, Vicente
Evaluation of the optical criteria for sessile serrated lesions of the colon: A prospective study on a colorectal cancer screening population
title Evaluation of the optical criteria for sessile serrated lesions of the colon: A prospective study on a colorectal cancer screening population
title_full Evaluation of the optical criteria for sessile serrated lesions of the colon: A prospective study on a colorectal cancer screening population
title_fullStr Evaluation of the optical criteria for sessile serrated lesions of the colon: A prospective study on a colorectal cancer screening population
title_full_unstemmed Evaluation of the optical criteria for sessile serrated lesions of the colon: A prospective study on a colorectal cancer screening population
title_short Evaluation of the optical criteria for sessile serrated lesions of the colon: A prospective study on a colorectal cancer screening population
title_sort evaluation of the optical criteria for sessile serrated lesions of the colon: a prospective study on a colorectal cancer screening population
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7775808/
https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33403231
http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1293-7086
work_keys_str_mv AT bustamantebalenmarco evaluationoftheopticalcriteriaforsessileserratedlesionsofthecolonaprospectivestudyonacolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT satorrescarla evaluationoftheopticalcriteriaforsessileserratedlesionsofthecolonaprospectivestudyonacolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT ramossolerdavid evaluationoftheopticalcriteriaforsessileserratedlesionsofthecolonaprospectivestudyonacolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT garciacamposmaria evaluationoftheopticalcriteriaforsessileserratedlesionsofthecolonaprospectivestudyonacolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT alonsonoelia evaluationoftheopticalcriteriaforsessileserratedlesionsofthecolonaprospectivestudyonacolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT poncemarta evaluationoftheopticalcriteriaforsessileserratedlesionsofthecolonaprospectivestudyonacolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT arguelloviudezlidia evaluationoftheopticalcriteriaforsessileserratedlesionsofthecolonaprospectivestudyonacolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT ginerfrancisco evaluationoftheopticalcriteriaforsessileserratedlesionsofthecolonaprospectivestudyonacolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT ferrerlozanojaime evaluationoftheopticalcriteriaforsessileserratedlesionsofthecolonaprospectivestudyonacolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation
AT ponsbeltranvicente evaluationoftheopticalcriteriaforsessileserratedlesionsofthecolonaprospectivestudyonacolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation