Cargando…
Evaluation of the optical criteria for sessile serrated lesions of the colon: A prospective study on a colorectal cancer screening population
Background and study aims We aimed to describe the presence and combination of Hazewinkelʼs optical diagnosis (OD) criteria for sessile serrated lesions (SSL), determining which lesion characteristics increase the probability of a correct OD, with a focus on diminutive lesions. Patients and methods...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Georg Thieme Verlag KG
2021
|
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7775808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33403231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1293-7086 |
_version_ | 1783630549259124736 |
---|---|
author | Bustamante-Balén, Marco Satorres, Carla Ramos-Soler, David García-Campos, Maria Alonso, Noelia Ponce, Marta Argüello-Viudez, Lidia Giner, Francisco Ferrer-Lozano, Jaime Pons-Beltrán, Vicente |
author_facet | Bustamante-Balén, Marco Satorres, Carla Ramos-Soler, David García-Campos, Maria Alonso, Noelia Ponce, Marta Argüello-Viudez, Lidia Giner, Francisco Ferrer-Lozano, Jaime Pons-Beltrán, Vicente |
author_sort | Bustamante-Balén, Marco |
collection | PubMed |
description | Background and study aims We aimed to describe the presence and combination of Hazewinkelʼs optical diagnosis (OD) criteria for sessile serrated lesions (SSL), determining which lesion characteristics increase the probability of a correct OD, with a focus on diminutive lesions. Patients and methods This was a prospective study describing the presence of Hazewinkelʼs OD criteria for SSL in lesions found in consecutive CRC screening colonoscopies. The presence of each OD criterion and their diagnostic combinations in SSL, related to the lesion’s NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification category, size, and location, were described. The presence of two or more optical criteria was considered diagnostic of SSL. The OD was compared to pathology as the gold standard. Results Seventy-nine SSLs (5.6 %) were diagnosed. Cloud-like appearance was the most prevalent OD criterion (35, 44.3 %). OD criteria were more frequently identified in NICE type 1, ≥ 10 mm, and proximal lesions. Only 26 SLLs fulfilled the OD criteria (sensitivity 32.9 %, 95 % CI 29.1 %–36.7 %). The sensitivity for diminutive SSL was 14.7 %, (95 % CI 11.9 %–17.6 %). Eighty-five lesions were optically diagnosed as SSL. However, only in 26 SSL was this the definitive diagnosis (positive predictive value 30.6 %, 95 % CI 26.9 %–34.3 %). Size > 5 mm and proximal location increased the probability of a correct diagnosis. The overall accuracy of the optical criteria was 92.0 % (95 % CI, 89.8 %–94.2 %). Conclusions The Hazewinkelʼs optical criteria are not reliable for a positive diagnosis of SSL, particularly for diminutive lesions. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7775808 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2021 |
publisher | Georg Thieme Verlag KG |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77758082021-01-04 Evaluation of the optical criteria for sessile serrated lesions of the colon: A prospective study on a colorectal cancer screening population Bustamante-Balén, Marco Satorres, Carla Ramos-Soler, David García-Campos, Maria Alonso, Noelia Ponce, Marta Argüello-Viudez, Lidia Giner, Francisco Ferrer-Lozano, Jaime Pons-Beltrán, Vicente Endosc Int Open Background and study aims We aimed to describe the presence and combination of Hazewinkelʼs optical diagnosis (OD) criteria for sessile serrated lesions (SSL), determining which lesion characteristics increase the probability of a correct OD, with a focus on diminutive lesions. Patients and methods This was a prospective study describing the presence of Hazewinkelʼs OD criteria for SSL in lesions found in consecutive CRC screening colonoscopies. The presence of each OD criterion and their diagnostic combinations in SSL, related to the lesion’s NBI International Colorectal Endoscopic (NICE) classification category, size, and location, were described. The presence of two or more optical criteria was considered diagnostic of SSL. The OD was compared to pathology as the gold standard. Results Seventy-nine SSLs (5.6 %) were diagnosed. Cloud-like appearance was the most prevalent OD criterion (35, 44.3 %). OD criteria were more frequently identified in NICE type 1, ≥ 10 mm, and proximal lesions. Only 26 SLLs fulfilled the OD criteria (sensitivity 32.9 %, 95 % CI 29.1 %–36.7 %). The sensitivity for diminutive SSL was 14.7 %, (95 % CI 11.9 %–17.6 %). Eighty-five lesions were optically diagnosed as SSL. However, only in 26 SSL was this the definitive diagnosis (positive predictive value 30.6 %, 95 % CI 26.9 %–34.3 %). Size > 5 mm and proximal location increased the probability of a correct diagnosis. The overall accuracy of the optical criteria was 92.0 % (95 % CI, 89.8 %–94.2 %). Conclusions The Hazewinkelʼs optical criteria are not reliable for a positive diagnosis of SSL, particularly for diminutive lesions. Georg Thieme Verlag KG 2021-01 2021-01-01 /pmc/articles/PMC7775808/ /pubmed/33403231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1293-7086 Text en The Author(s). This is an open access article published by Thieme under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonDerivative-NonCommercial License, permitting copying and reproduction so long as the original work is given appropriate credit. Contents may not be used for commecial purposes, or adapted, remixed, transformed or built upon. (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/) https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivatives License, which permits unrestricted reproduction and distribution, for non-commercial purposes only; and use and reproduction, but not distribution, of adapted material for non-commercial purposes only, provided the original work is properly cited. |
spellingShingle | Bustamante-Balén, Marco Satorres, Carla Ramos-Soler, David García-Campos, Maria Alonso, Noelia Ponce, Marta Argüello-Viudez, Lidia Giner, Francisco Ferrer-Lozano, Jaime Pons-Beltrán, Vicente Evaluation of the optical criteria for sessile serrated lesions of the colon: A prospective study on a colorectal cancer screening population |
title | Evaluation of the optical criteria for sessile serrated lesions of the colon: A prospective study on a colorectal cancer screening population |
title_full | Evaluation of the optical criteria for sessile serrated lesions of the colon: A prospective study on a colorectal cancer screening population |
title_fullStr | Evaluation of the optical criteria for sessile serrated lesions of the colon: A prospective study on a colorectal cancer screening population |
title_full_unstemmed | Evaluation of the optical criteria for sessile serrated lesions of the colon: A prospective study on a colorectal cancer screening population |
title_short | Evaluation of the optical criteria for sessile serrated lesions of the colon: A prospective study on a colorectal cancer screening population |
title_sort | evaluation of the optical criteria for sessile serrated lesions of the colon: a prospective study on a colorectal cancer screening population |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7775808/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33403231 http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/a-1293-7086 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT bustamantebalenmarco evaluationoftheopticalcriteriaforsessileserratedlesionsofthecolonaprospectivestudyonacolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT satorrescarla evaluationoftheopticalcriteriaforsessileserratedlesionsofthecolonaprospectivestudyonacolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT ramossolerdavid evaluationoftheopticalcriteriaforsessileserratedlesionsofthecolonaprospectivestudyonacolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT garciacamposmaria evaluationoftheopticalcriteriaforsessileserratedlesionsofthecolonaprospectivestudyonacolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT alonsonoelia evaluationoftheopticalcriteriaforsessileserratedlesionsofthecolonaprospectivestudyonacolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT poncemarta evaluationoftheopticalcriteriaforsessileserratedlesionsofthecolonaprospectivestudyonacolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT arguelloviudezlidia evaluationoftheopticalcriteriaforsessileserratedlesionsofthecolonaprospectivestudyonacolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT ginerfrancisco evaluationoftheopticalcriteriaforsessileserratedlesionsofthecolonaprospectivestudyonacolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT ferrerlozanojaime evaluationoftheopticalcriteriaforsessileserratedlesionsofthecolonaprospectivestudyonacolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation AT ponsbeltranvicente evaluationoftheopticalcriteriaforsessileserratedlesionsofthecolonaprospectivestudyonacolorectalcancerscreeningpopulation |