Cargando…
Physiological Effects of N95 FFP and PPE in Healthcare Workers in COVID Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Cohort Study
BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at increased risk of exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Personal protective equipment (PPE) is mandated for HCWs. However, the physiological effects on the HCWs while working in the protective gear remains unexplored. T...
Autores principales: | , , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7775948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33446967 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23671 |
_version_ | 1783630569783951360 |
---|---|
author | Choudhury, Arin Singh, Meena Khurana, Deepa Kerketta Mustafi, Saurav Mitra Ganapathy, Usha Kumar, Ajay Sharma, Saumya |
author_facet | Choudhury, Arin Singh, Meena Khurana, Deepa Kerketta Mustafi, Saurav Mitra Ganapathy, Usha Kumar, Ajay Sharma, Saumya |
author_sort | Choudhury, Arin |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at increased risk of exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Personal protective equipment (PPE) is mandated for HCWs. However, the physiological effects on the HCWs while working in the protective gear remains unexplored. This study aimed to assess the physiological effects of the prolonged use of PPE on HCWs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five HCWs, aged 18–50 years were enrolled in this prospective, observational, cohort study. The physiological variables [heart rate, oxygen saturation, and perfusion index (PI)] were recorded at the start of duty, 4 hours after wearing N95 filtering facepiece respirator (FFR), pre-donning, and post-doffing. The rating of perceived exertion (RPE) score and modified Borg scale for dyspnea was evaluated. The physiological variables were represented as the mean ± standard deviation. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to show any difference in RPE and modified Borg scale for dyspnea. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There is a statistically significant difference in the physiological parameters post-doffing compared with baseline: Heart rate (p < 0.001); oxygen saturation (p < 0.001); PI (p < 0.001). RPE score showed increased discomfort with continuous use of N95 FFR. However, exertion increased only marginally. The major adverse effects noted with PPE use were fogging, headache, tiredness, difficulty in breathing, and mask soakage, with a resultant mean duration of donning to be 3.1 hours. CONCLUSION: The use of PPE can result in considerable changes in the physiological variables of healthy HCWs. The side effects may lead to excessive exhaustion and increased tiredness after prolonged shifts in the intensive care unit (ICU) while wearing PPE. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Choudhury A, Singh M, Khurana DK, Mustafi SM, Ganapathy U, Kumar A, et al. Physiological Effects of N95 FFP and PPE in Healthcare Workers in COVID Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Cohort Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(12):1169–1173. |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7775948 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77759482021-01-13 Physiological Effects of N95 FFP and PPE in Healthcare Workers in COVID Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Cohort Study Choudhury, Arin Singh, Meena Khurana, Deepa Kerketta Mustafi, Saurav Mitra Ganapathy, Usha Kumar, Ajay Sharma, Saumya Indian J Crit Care Med Original Article BACKGROUND: Healthcare workers (HCWs) are at increased risk of exposure to severe acute respiratory syndrome-coronavirus-2 (SARS-CoV-2). Personal protective equipment (PPE) is mandated for HCWs. However, the physiological effects on the HCWs while working in the protective gear remains unexplored. This study aimed to assess the physiological effects of the prolonged use of PPE on HCWs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-five HCWs, aged 18–50 years were enrolled in this prospective, observational, cohort study. The physiological variables [heart rate, oxygen saturation, and perfusion index (PI)] were recorded at the start of duty, 4 hours after wearing N95 filtering facepiece respirator (FFR), pre-donning, and post-doffing. The rating of perceived exertion (RPE) score and modified Borg scale for dyspnea was evaluated. The physiological variables were represented as the mean ± standard deviation. Wilcoxon signed-rank test was used to show any difference in RPE and modified Borg scale for dyspnea. A p value of <0.05 was considered significant. RESULTS: There is a statistically significant difference in the physiological parameters post-doffing compared with baseline: Heart rate (p < 0.001); oxygen saturation (p < 0.001); PI (p < 0.001). RPE score showed increased discomfort with continuous use of N95 FFR. However, exertion increased only marginally. The major adverse effects noted with PPE use were fogging, headache, tiredness, difficulty in breathing, and mask soakage, with a resultant mean duration of donning to be 3.1 hours. CONCLUSION: The use of PPE can result in considerable changes in the physiological variables of healthy HCWs. The side effects may lead to excessive exhaustion and increased tiredness after prolonged shifts in the intensive care unit (ICU) while wearing PPE. HOW TO CITE THIS ARTICLE: Choudhury A, Singh M, Khurana DK, Mustafi SM, Ganapathy U, Kumar A, et al. Physiological Effects of N95 FFP and PPE in Healthcare Workers in COVID Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Cohort Study. Indian J Crit Care Med 2020;24(12):1169–1173. Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers 2020-12 /pmc/articles/PMC7775948/ /pubmed/33446967 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23671 Text en Copyright © 2020; Jaypee Brothers Medical Publishers (P) Ltd. © The Author(s). 2020 Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and non-commercial reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver (http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated. |
spellingShingle | Original Article Choudhury, Arin Singh, Meena Khurana, Deepa Kerketta Mustafi, Saurav Mitra Ganapathy, Usha Kumar, Ajay Sharma, Saumya Physiological Effects of N95 FFP and PPE in Healthcare Workers in COVID Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Cohort Study |
title | Physiological Effects of N95 FFP and PPE in Healthcare Workers in COVID Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Cohort Study |
title_full | Physiological Effects of N95 FFP and PPE in Healthcare Workers in COVID Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Cohort Study |
title_fullStr | Physiological Effects of N95 FFP and PPE in Healthcare Workers in COVID Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Cohort Study |
title_full_unstemmed | Physiological Effects of N95 FFP and PPE in Healthcare Workers in COVID Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Cohort Study |
title_short | Physiological Effects of N95 FFP and PPE in Healthcare Workers in COVID Intensive Care Unit: A Prospective Cohort Study |
title_sort | physiological effects of n95 ffp and ppe in healthcare workers in covid intensive care unit: a prospective cohort study |
topic | Original Article |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7775948/ https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/33446967 http://dx.doi.org/10.5005/jp-journals-10071-23671 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT choudhuryarin physiologicaleffectsofn95ffpandppeinhealthcareworkersincovidintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy AT singhmeena physiologicaleffectsofn95ffpandppeinhealthcareworkersincovidintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy AT khuranadeepakerketta physiologicaleffectsofn95ffpandppeinhealthcareworkersincovidintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy AT mustafisauravmitra physiologicaleffectsofn95ffpandppeinhealthcareworkersincovidintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy AT ganapathyusha physiologicaleffectsofn95ffpandppeinhealthcareworkersincovidintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy AT kumarajay physiologicaleffectsofn95ffpandppeinhealthcareworkersincovidintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy AT sharmasaumya physiologicaleffectsofn95ffpandppeinhealthcareworkersincovidintensivecareunitaprospectivecohortstudy |