Cargando…

954. Missed opportunities for HIV Screening in the Emergency Department

BACKGROUND: There are 1.14 million people infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the United States, and only about 86% are diagnosed. HIV diagnosis is the first step to care and expanded testing is essential to reduce transmission. Individuals with undiagnosed HIV have a transmission ra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hirsch, Amanda, Carpenter, Christopher F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776095/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1140
_version_ 1783630601144762368
author Hirsch, Amanda
Carpenter, Christopher F
author_facet Hirsch, Amanda
Carpenter, Christopher F
author_sort Hirsch, Amanda
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: There are 1.14 million people infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the United States, and only about 86% are diagnosed. HIV diagnosis is the first step to care and expanded testing is essential to reduce transmission. Individuals with undiagnosed HIV have a transmission rate 3.5 times higher than those aware of their infection. Individuals seeking testing and treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) represent a higher risk population for HIV infection. Despite revised Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations to expand HIV testing in healthcare settings, testing remains low. A significant obstacle to expanded testing, especially in emergency departments (EDs), is concern about ensuring appropriate HIV test tracking and follow-up. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients presenting with symptoms of an STI between January 1, 2015 and July 8, 2019 at eight Beaumont Health EDs in Southeast Michigan. De-identified data was collected from the electronic health record (EHR) for patients aged 10 and older who had testing for one or more STIs including gonorrhea, syphilis, and chlamydia. Patients were evaluated for concurrent HIV testing during the encounter, and patients known to be HIV infected were excluded. RESULTS: Of 32,640 encounters during which patients not known to be HIV infected were tested for STIs, only 68 (0.21%) included HIV antibody/antigen screening. Of those tested, only one (1.47%) returned reactive. The remaining 67 screenings returned non-reactive. Applying only 10% of this diagnosis rate to the total number of STI encounters suggests an opportunity to diagnose 47 additional individuals; applying 50% of this rate and the corresponding value is 239 individuals. CONCLUSION: These results highlight the need for expanded HIV screening in EDs. Systematic HIV test tracking and follow-up removes this burden from ED providers and enables expanded HIV testing in these settings. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7776095
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77760952021-01-07 954. Missed opportunities for HIV Screening in the Emergency Department Hirsch, Amanda Carpenter, Christopher F Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: There are 1.14 million people infected with human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) in the United States, and only about 86% are diagnosed. HIV diagnosis is the first step to care and expanded testing is essential to reduce transmission. Individuals with undiagnosed HIV have a transmission rate 3.5 times higher than those aware of their infection. Individuals seeking testing and treatment for sexually transmitted infections (STIs) represent a higher risk population for HIV infection. Despite revised Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) recommendations to expand HIV testing in healthcare settings, testing remains low. A significant obstacle to expanded testing, especially in emergency departments (EDs), is concern about ensuring appropriate HIV test tracking and follow-up. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of patients presenting with symptoms of an STI between January 1, 2015 and July 8, 2019 at eight Beaumont Health EDs in Southeast Michigan. De-identified data was collected from the electronic health record (EHR) for patients aged 10 and older who had testing for one or more STIs including gonorrhea, syphilis, and chlamydia. Patients were evaluated for concurrent HIV testing during the encounter, and patients known to be HIV infected were excluded. RESULTS: Of 32,640 encounters during which patients not known to be HIV infected were tested for STIs, only 68 (0.21%) included HIV antibody/antigen screening. Of those tested, only one (1.47%) returned reactive. The remaining 67 screenings returned non-reactive. Applying only 10% of this diagnosis rate to the total number of STI encounters suggests an opportunity to diagnose 47 additional individuals; applying 50% of this rate and the corresponding value is 239 individuals. CONCLUSION: These results highlight the need for expanded HIV screening in EDs. Systematic HIV test tracking and follow-up removes this burden from ED providers and enables expanded HIV testing in these settings. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7776095/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1140 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Hirsch, Amanda
Carpenter, Christopher F
954. Missed opportunities for HIV Screening in the Emergency Department
title 954. Missed opportunities for HIV Screening in the Emergency Department
title_full 954. Missed opportunities for HIV Screening in the Emergency Department
title_fullStr 954. Missed opportunities for HIV Screening in the Emergency Department
title_full_unstemmed 954. Missed opportunities for HIV Screening in the Emergency Department
title_short 954. Missed opportunities for HIV Screening in the Emergency Department
title_sort 954. missed opportunities for hiv screening in the emergency department
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776095/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1140
work_keys_str_mv AT hirschamanda 954missedopportunitiesforhivscreeningintheemergencydepartment
AT carpenterchristopherf 954missedopportunitiesforhivscreeningintheemergencydepartment