Cargando…

653. Comparison of Yeasts identification by Biofire, Culture and ePlex for Quality Assurance purpose

BACKGROUND: At the University of Kentucky Medical center (UKMC), positive fungal blood cultures are concurrently run through the Biofire Blood Culture Identification (BCID) panel which detects 5 Candida species. The newer platform, the GenMarkDx ePlex BCID-FP (fungal panel) is designed to detect 16...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: lin, jeffrey, Myint, Thein, Arora, Vaneet, Ribes, Julie A
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776130/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.847
_version_ 1783630609437949952
author lin, jeffrey
Myint, Thein
Arora, Vaneet
Ribes, Julie A
author_facet lin, jeffrey
Myint, Thein
Arora, Vaneet
Ribes, Julie A
author_sort lin, jeffrey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: At the University of Kentucky Medical center (UKMC), positive fungal blood cultures are concurrently run through the Biofire Blood Culture Identification (BCID) panel which detects 5 Candida species. The newer platform, the GenMarkDx ePlex BCID-FP (fungal panel) is designed to detect 16 fungal targets. Our study compares the performance of the Biofire BCID panel’s with culture as the gold standard method. We examine the percentage of agreement by both testing methods and predict the performance of the GenMarkDx ePlex BCID-FP panel based on culture results. We also look at the number of other yeasts not included in Biofire BCID panel that could be picked up by the GenMarkDx ePlex BCID-FP panel. METHODS: Positive fungal blood cultures from July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019 were run through the Biofire BCID panel. Culture results were used to extrapolate whether the GenMarkDx ePlex FP would provide any additional diagnostic benefit. Results were categorized as true or false positives and negatives as compared to culture as the gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 141 blood cultures were tested via the Biofire BCID panel for the identification of yeasts. Of these, 123 (87%) yielded Biofire results in concordance with culture results. We would expect these also to be positive on the GenMarkDx ePlex BCID-FP panel. In addition, 18 specimens (13%) would have tested positive on the GenMarkDx ePlex BCID-FP panel and not the Biofire BCID panel. These organisms were noted to be Candida lusitaniae (n=6), Cryptococcus neoformans (n=3), Candida dublinensis (n=2), and Candida keyfr (n=1). Organisms that were found on culture that were not detected by both GenMarkDx ePlex BCID-FP panel and Biofire BCID panel were Candida nivariensis (n=2), Pichia ohmeri (n=1), Trichospon species (n=2). CONCLUSION: Based on these data, we expect that the ePlex would have correctly identified 95.9% of the yeasts in this patient population. This represents an additional 18 (13%) of specimens that could be detected rapidly from the positive blood culture if the GenMarkDx ePlex BCID-FP panel were used instead of the Biofire BCID panel. Early identification can influence the choice of antifungal agent. Less than 5 % of the yeasts would have remained unidentified by ePLex compared to 13% for Biofire. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7776130
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77761302021-01-07 653. Comparison of Yeasts identification by Biofire, Culture and ePlex for Quality Assurance purpose lin, jeffrey Myint, Thein Arora, Vaneet Ribes, Julie A Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: At the University of Kentucky Medical center (UKMC), positive fungal blood cultures are concurrently run through the Biofire Blood Culture Identification (BCID) panel which detects 5 Candida species. The newer platform, the GenMarkDx ePlex BCID-FP (fungal panel) is designed to detect 16 fungal targets. Our study compares the performance of the Biofire BCID panel’s with culture as the gold standard method. We examine the percentage of agreement by both testing methods and predict the performance of the GenMarkDx ePlex BCID-FP panel based on culture results. We also look at the number of other yeasts not included in Biofire BCID panel that could be picked up by the GenMarkDx ePlex BCID-FP panel. METHODS: Positive fungal blood cultures from July 1, 2018 to June 30, 2019 were run through the Biofire BCID panel. Culture results were used to extrapolate whether the GenMarkDx ePlex FP would provide any additional diagnostic benefit. Results were categorized as true or false positives and negatives as compared to culture as the gold standard. RESULTS: A total of 141 blood cultures were tested via the Biofire BCID panel for the identification of yeasts. Of these, 123 (87%) yielded Biofire results in concordance with culture results. We would expect these also to be positive on the GenMarkDx ePlex BCID-FP panel. In addition, 18 specimens (13%) would have tested positive on the GenMarkDx ePlex BCID-FP panel and not the Biofire BCID panel. These organisms were noted to be Candida lusitaniae (n=6), Cryptococcus neoformans (n=3), Candida dublinensis (n=2), and Candida keyfr (n=1). Organisms that were found on culture that were not detected by both GenMarkDx ePlex BCID-FP panel and Biofire BCID panel were Candida nivariensis (n=2), Pichia ohmeri (n=1), Trichospon species (n=2). CONCLUSION: Based on these data, we expect that the ePlex would have correctly identified 95.9% of the yeasts in this patient population. This represents an additional 18 (13%) of specimens that could be detected rapidly from the positive blood culture if the GenMarkDx ePlex BCID-FP panel were used instead of the Biofire BCID panel. Early identification can influence the choice of antifungal agent. Less than 5 % of the yeasts would have remained unidentified by ePLex compared to 13% for Biofire. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7776130/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.847 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
lin, jeffrey
Myint, Thein
Arora, Vaneet
Ribes, Julie A
653. Comparison of Yeasts identification by Biofire, Culture and ePlex for Quality Assurance purpose
title 653. Comparison of Yeasts identification by Biofire, Culture and ePlex for Quality Assurance purpose
title_full 653. Comparison of Yeasts identification by Biofire, Culture and ePlex for Quality Assurance purpose
title_fullStr 653. Comparison of Yeasts identification by Biofire, Culture and ePlex for Quality Assurance purpose
title_full_unstemmed 653. Comparison of Yeasts identification by Biofire, Culture and ePlex for Quality Assurance purpose
title_short 653. Comparison of Yeasts identification by Biofire, Culture and ePlex for Quality Assurance purpose
title_sort 653. comparison of yeasts identification by biofire, culture and eplex for quality assurance purpose
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776130/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.847
work_keys_str_mv AT linjeffrey 653comparisonofyeastsidentificationbybiofirecultureandeplexforqualityassurancepurpose
AT myintthein 653comparisonofyeastsidentificationbybiofirecultureandeplexforqualityassurancepurpose
AT aroravaneet 653comparisonofyeastsidentificationbybiofirecultureandeplexforqualityassurancepurpose
AT ribesjuliea 653comparisonofyeastsidentificationbybiofirecultureandeplexforqualityassurancepurpose