Cargando…

1096. Linezolid versus Tedizolid for the Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: An Assessment of Safety

BACKGROUND: Treatment options for nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections are limited by the long-term tolerability of antimicrobials. The oxazolidinones, linezolid and tedizolid, display in vitro activity against many NTM species and demonstrate excellent oral bioavailability. This study compa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Poon, Yi Kee, Hoz, Ricardo M La, Sanders, James, Hynan, Linda S, Monogue, Marguerite
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776191/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1282
_version_ 1783630624169394176
author Poon, Yi Kee
Hoz, Ricardo M La
Sanders, James
Hynan, Linda S
Monogue, Marguerite
author_facet Poon, Yi Kee
Hoz, Ricardo M La
Sanders, James
Hynan, Linda S
Monogue, Marguerite
author_sort Poon, Yi Kee
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Treatment options for nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections are limited by the long-term tolerability of antimicrobials. The oxazolidinones, linezolid and tedizolid, display in vitro activity against many NTM species and demonstrate excellent oral bioavailability. This study compares the hematologic safety profile of linezolid versus tedizolid for the treatment of NTM in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult SOT recipients who received linezolid or tedizolid as part of a multi-drug regimen to treat NTM between January 1, 2010 to August 31, 2019. The primary endpoint was the hematologic effects of linezolid versus tedizolid from therapy initiation to week seven. This time frame was chosen based on the median duration of therapy. A mixed-effects ANOVA model was used to assess the effects of linezolid and tedizolid on platelet counts (PLT), absolute neutrophil counts (ANC), and hemoglobin (Hgb) across time. Subjects were treated as a random effect. The secondary analysis described the proportion of adverse effects and discontinuation. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were included in the analysis (9 linezolid, 15 tedizolid). Mycobacterium abscessus abscessus was the most common isolate, and pulmonary was the most common site of infection (Table 1). The median duration of therapy was 24 days (range 3 to 164 days) and 48 days (range 11 to 571 days) for linezolid and tedizolid, respectively. All patients in the linezolid group received 600 mg daily or less for the majority of treatment duration. In the mixed-effects ANOVA, the ANC decreased in both groups after seven weeks of therapy (p=0.04). Otherwise, no significant effects for week, treatment group, or interaction between week and treatment group were found (Figure 1). Thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were common in both groups, and around one-fifth of patients in each group discontinued the medication due to adverse effects (Table 2). Table 1. Baseline characteristics of solid organ transplant recipients who received linezolid or tedizolid as part of a multi-drug regimen to treat nontuberculous mycobacteria infections between January 1, 2010 to August 31, 2019 at UT Southwestern Medical Center. [Image: see text] Table 2. Adverse drug events and discontinuation of therapy over seven weeks of therapy. [Image: see text] Figure 1. Effects of linezolid versus tedizolid during the initial seven weeks of therapy using a mixed-effects ANOVA model, (a) platelet counts, (b) absolute neutrophil counts, and (c) hemoglobin. [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Non-significant statistical differences were found comparing the effects of linezolid versus tedizolid for PLT, ANC, and Hgb using mixed-effects ANOVA models. Larger cohort studies are required to compare the hematologic adverse effect profile of the oxazolidinones for the treatment of NTM infections in SOT recipients. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7776191
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77761912021-01-07 1096. Linezolid versus Tedizolid for the Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: An Assessment of Safety Poon, Yi Kee Hoz, Ricardo M La Sanders, James Hynan, Linda S Monogue, Marguerite Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Treatment options for nontuberculous mycobacteria (NTM) infections are limited by the long-term tolerability of antimicrobials. The oxazolidinones, linezolid and tedizolid, display in vitro activity against many NTM species and demonstrate excellent oral bioavailability. This study compares the hematologic safety profile of linezolid versus tedizolid for the treatment of NTM in solid organ transplant (SOT) recipients. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included adult SOT recipients who received linezolid or tedizolid as part of a multi-drug regimen to treat NTM between January 1, 2010 to August 31, 2019. The primary endpoint was the hematologic effects of linezolid versus tedizolid from therapy initiation to week seven. This time frame was chosen based on the median duration of therapy. A mixed-effects ANOVA model was used to assess the effects of linezolid and tedizolid on platelet counts (PLT), absolute neutrophil counts (ANC), and hemoglobin (Hgb) across time. Subjects were treated as a random effect. The secondary analysis described the proportion of adverse effects and discontinuation. RESULTS: Twenty-four patients were included in the analysis (9 linezolid, 15 tedizolid). Mycobacterium abscessus abscessus was the most common isolate, and pulmonary was the most common site of infection (Table 1). The median duration of therapy was 24 days (range 3 to 164 days) and 48 days (range 11 to 571 days) for linezolid and tedizolid, respectively. All patients in the linezolid group received 600 mg daily or less for the majority of treatment duration. In the mixed-effects ANOVA, the ANC decreased in both groups after seven weeks of therapy (p=0.04). Otherwise, no significant effects for week, treatment group, or interaction between week and treatment group were found (Figure 1). Thrombocytopenia and neutropenia were common in both groups, and around one-fifth of patients in each group discontinued the medication due to adverse effects (Table 2). Table 1. Baseline characteristics of solid organ transplant recipients who received linezolid or tedizolid as part of a multi-drug regimen to treat nontuberculous mycobacteria infections between January 1, 2010 to August 31, 2019 at UT Southwestern Medical Center. [Image: see text] Table 2. Adverse drug events and discontinuation of therapy over seven weeks of therapy. [Image: see text] Figure 1. Effects of linezolid versus tedizolid during the initial seven weeks of therapy using a mixed-effects ANOVA model, (a) platelet counts, (b) absolute neutrophil counts, and (c) hemoglobin. [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Non-significant statistical differences were found comparing the effects of linezolid versus tedizolid for PLT, ANC, and Hgb using mixed-effects ANOVA models. Larger cohort studies are required to compare the hematologic adverse effect profile of the oxazolidinones for the treatment of NTM infections in SOT recipients. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7776191/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1282 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Poon, Yi Kee
Hoz, Ricardo M La
Sanders, James
Hynan, Linda S
Monogue, Marguerite
1096. Linezolid versus Tedizolid for the Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: An Assessment of Safety
title 1096. Linezolid versus Tedizolid for the Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: An Assessment of Safety
title_full 1096. Linezolid versus Tedizolid for the Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: An Assessment of Safety
title_fullStr 1096. Linezolid versus Tedizolid for the Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: An Assessment of Safety
title_full_unstemmed 1096. Linezolid versus Tedizolid for the Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: An Assessment of Safety
title_short 1096. Linezolid versus Tedizolid for the Treatment of Nontuberculous Mycobacteria in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients: An Assessment of Safety
title_sort 1096. linezolid versus tedizolid for the treatment of nontuberculous mycobacteria in solid organ transplant recipients: an assessment of safety
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776191/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1282
work_keys_str_mv AT poonyikee 1096linezolidversustedizolidforthetreatmentofnontuberculousmycobacteriainsolidorgantransplantrecipientsanassessmentofsafety
AT hozricardomla 1096linezolidversustedizolidforthetreatmentofnontuberculousmycobacteriainsolidorgantransplantrecipientsanassessmentofsafety
AT sandersjames 1096linezolidversustedizolidforthetreatmentofnontuberculousmycobacteriainsolidorgantransplantrecipientsanassessmentofsafety
AT hynanlindas 1096linezolidversustedizolidforthetreatmentofnontuberculousmycobacteriainsolidorgantransplantrecipientsanassessmentofsafety
AT monoguemarguerite 1096linezolidversustedizolidforthetreatmentofnontuberculousmycobacteriainsolidorgantransplantrecipientsanassessmentofsafety