Cargando…

858. Inter-rater Reliability of Hand Hygiene Observers with an Electronic Monitoring System

BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene (HH) is the bedrock of infection prevention. Knowing the limitations of hand hygiene observers, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System invested in technology to remotely monitor health care workers’s (HCW) HH. Each hand sanitizer and soap dispenser in the patient car...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bailey, Pamela, Armstrong-Novak, Jo Dee, Cooper, Kaila, Stevens, Michael, Bearman, Gonzalo, Doll, Michelle
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776195/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1047
_version_ 1783630625171832832
author Bailey, Pamela
Armstrong-Novak, Jo Dee
Cooper, Kaila
Stevens, Michael
Bearman, Gonzalo
Doll, Michelle
author_facet Bailey, Pamela
Armstrong-Novak, Jo Dee
Cooper, Kaila
Stevens, Michael
Bearman, Gonzalo
Doll, Michelle
author_sort Bailey, Pamela
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene (HH) is the bedrock of infection prevention. Knowing the limitations of hand hygiene observers, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System invested in technology to remotely monitor health care workers’s (HCW) HH. Each hand sanitizer and soap dispenser in the patient care areas has a sensor, as well as each patient’s bed and each HCW. As the HCW moves around the environment, the sensors detect whether or not HH was performed for each opportunity. METHODS: While monitoring HH via observations, we compared the manual observations and the technologic hand hygiene observations. RESULTS: Of 31 witnessed and manually recorded HH observations, 30 were noted in the electronic system (96.7% correspondence). There was only one witnessed opportunity that the technology failed to capture, when the staff member was performing hand hygiene while standing in the doorway talking to the nurse inside the room. There were multiple missed opportunities for HH while in patient rooms, as defined by the WHO’s Five Moments. CONCLUSION: There was excellent correspondence between the manual observations and the HH technology in this study. There is significant limitation in what an observer can do, while the HH technology will average around 35,000 ‘observations’ on a daily basis and is capable of capturing more of the 5 moments of HH. We have previously noted interference in the wireless technology in the healthcare environment. However, failure of providers to perform HH when indicated overshadow the failures of technology to capture HH that is performed. Better understanding of the indications for HH in accordance with the WHO 5 Moments may improve provider trust in the technology. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7776195
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77761952021-01-07 858. Inter-rater Reliability of Hand Hygiene Observers with an Electronic Monitoring System Bailey, Pamela Armstrong-Novak, Jo Dee Cooper, Kaila Stevens, Michael Bearman, Gonzalo Doll, Michelle Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Hand hygiene (HH) is the bedrock of infection prevention. Knowing the limitations of hand hygiene observers, Virginia Commonwealth University Health System invested in technology to remotely monitor health care workers’s (HCW) HH. Each hand sanitizer and soap dispenser in the patient care areas has a sensor, as well as each patient’s bed and each HCW. As the HCW moves around the environment, the sensors detect whether or not HH was performed for each opportunity. METHODS: While monitoring HH via observations, we compared the manual observations and the technologic hand hygiene observations. RESULTS: Of 31 witnessed and manually recorded HH observations, 30 were noted in the electronic system (96.7% correspondence). There was only one witnessed opportunity that the technology failed to capture, when the staff member was performing hand hygiene while standing in the doorway talking to the nurse inside the room. There were multiple missed opportunities for HH while in patient rooms, as defined by the WHO’s Five Moments. CONCLUSION: There was excellent correspondence between the manual observations and the HH technology in this study. There is significant limitation in what an observer can do, while the HH technology will average around 35,000 ‘observations’ on a daily basis and is capable of capturing more of the 5 moments of HH. We have previously noted interference in the wireless technology in the healthcare environment. However, failure of providers to perform HH when indicated overshadow the failures of technology to capture HH that is performed. Better understanding of the indications for HH in accordance with the WHO 5 Moments may improve provider trust in the technology. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7776195/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1047 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Bailey, Pamela
Armstrong-Novak, Jo Dee
Cooper, Kaila
Stevens, Michael
Bearman, Gonzalo
Doll, Michelle
858. Inter-rater Reliability of Hand Hygiene Observers with an Electronic Monitoring System
title 858. Inter-rater Reliability of Hand Hygiene Observers with an Electronic Monitoring System
title_full 858. Inter-rater Reliability of Hand Hygiene Observers with an Electronic Monitoring System
title_fullStr 858. Inter-rater Reliability of Hand Hygiene Observers with an Electronic Monitoring System
title_full_unstemmed 858. Inter-rater Reliability of Hand Hygiene Observers with an Electronic Monitoring System
title_short 858. Inter-rater Reliability of Hand Hygiene Observers with an Electronic Monitoring System
title_sort 858. inter-rater reliability of hand hygiene observers with an electronic monitoring system
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776195/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1047
work_keys_str_mv AT baileypamela 858interraterreliabilityofhandhygieneobserverswithanelectronicmonitoringsystem
AT armstrongnovakjodee 858interraterreliabilityofhandhygieneobserverswithanelectronicmonitoringsystem
AT cooperkaila 858interraterreliabilityofhandhygieneobserverswithanelectronicmonitoringsystem
AT stevensmichael 858interraterreliabilityofhandhygieneobserverswithanelectronicmonitoringsystem
AT bearmangonzalo 858interraterreliabilityofhandhygieneobserverswithanelectronicmonitoringsystem
AT dollmichelle 858interraterreliabilityofhandhygieneobserverswithanelectronicmonitoringsystem