Cargando…

667. Multicenter Assessment of Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using Updated CLSI Levofloxacin Breakpoints on MicroScan Dried Gram Negative MIC Panels

BACKGROUND: Data from a multicenter clinical study with Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and P. aeruginosa on a MicroScan Dried Gram-negative MIC (MSDGN) Panel was evaluated with updated US FDA/CLSI levofloxacin breakpoints. MIC results were compared to results obtained with frozen broth microdilut...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Garner, Omai, Traczewski, Maria M, Beasley, Denise, Harrington, Amanda, DesJarlais, Sharon, Hastey, Christine, Brookman, Regina, Lockett, Zabrina, Chau, Jennifer
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776295/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.860
_version_ 1783630649087754240
author Garner, Omai
Traczewski, Maria M
Beasley, Denise
Harrington, Amanda
DesJarlais, Sharon
Hastey, Christine
Brookman, Regina
Lockett, Zabrina
Chau, Jennifer
author_facet Garner, Omai
Traczewski, Maria M
Beasley, Denise
Harrington, Amanda
DesJarlais, Sharon
Hastey, Christine
Brookman, Regina
Lockett, Zabrina
Chau, Jennifer
author_sort Garner, Omai
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Data from a multicenter clinical study with Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and P. aeruginosa on a MicroScan Dried Gram-negative MIC (MSDGN) Panel was evaluated with updated US FDA/CLSI levofloxacin breakpoints. MIC results were compared to results obtained with frozen broth microdilution panels prepared according to CLSI methodology. METHODS: A total of 839 Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and P. aeruginosa clinical isolates were tested at three clinical sites in efficacy and challenge combined. MSDGN panels were evaluated with turbidity and Prompt(®) methods of inoculation. MIC values obtained from the MSDGN panels were compared to MICs utilizing a CLSI broth microdilution reference panel. To assess reproducibility, a subset of 15 organisms were tested on MSDGN panels at each site. MSDGN panels were incubated at 35 ± 1(º)C and read on the WalkAway System, the autoSCAN-4 instrument, and visually. Read times for the MSDGN panels were at 16-20 hours. Frozen reference panels were prepared and read according to CLSI methodology. FDA and CLSI breakpoints (µg/mL) used for interpretation of MIC results were: Enterobacterales ≤ 0. 5 S, 1 I, ≥ 2 R; Salmonella spp. ≤ 0.12 S, 0.25-1 I, ≥ 2 R; P. aeruginosa ≤ 1 S, 2 I, ≥ 4 R. RESULTS: Essential and categorical agreement were calculated compared to frozen reference panel results. Results for isolates tested during efficacy and challenge with Prompt inoculation and manual read are as follows: CONCLUSION: Levofloxacin MIC results for Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp., and P. aeruginosa obtained with the MSDGN panel correlate well with MICs obtained using frozen reference panels using updated FDA/CLSI interpretive criteria in this multicenter study. * PROMPT(®) is a registered trademark of 3M Company, St. Paul, MN USA. BEC, the stylized logo and the BEC product and service marks mentioned herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of Beckman Coulter, Inc. in the US and other countries. DISCLOSURES: Omai Garner, PhD, D(ABMM), Beckman Coulter (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Maria M. Traczewski, BS MT (ASCP), Beckman Coulter (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Denise Beasley, BS, Beckman Coulter (Other Financial or Material Support, Research personnel) Amanda Harrington, PhD, Beckman Coulter (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Sharon DesJarlais, BS, Beckman Coulter (Other Financial or Material Support, Research personnel) Christine Hastey, PhD, Beckman Coulter (Employee) Regina Brookman, BS, Beckman Coulter (Employee) Zabrina Lockett, MS, Beckman Coulter (Employee) Jennifer Chau, PhD, Beckman Coulter (Employee)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7776295
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77762952021-01-07 667. Multicenter Assessment of Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using Updated CLSI Levofloxacin Breakpoints on MicroScan Dried Gram Negative MIC Panels Garner, Omai Traczewski, Maria M Beasley, Denise Harrington, Amanda DesJarlais, Sharon Hastey, Christine Brookman, Regina Lockett, Zabrina Chau, Jennifer Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Data from a multicenter clinical study with Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and P. aeruginosa on a MicroScan Dried Gram-negative MIC (MSDGN) Panel was evaluated with updated US FDA/CLSI levofloxacin breakpoints. MIC results were compared to results obtained with frozen broth microdilution panels prepared according to CLSI methodology. METHODS: A total of 839 Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and P. aeruginosa clinical isolates were tested at three clinical sites in efficacy and challenge combined. MSDGN panels were evaluated with turbidity and Prompt(®) methods of inoculation. MIC values obtained from the MSDGN panels were compared to MICs utilizing a CLSI broth microdilution reference panel. To assess reproducibility, a subset of 15 organisms were tested on MSDGN panels at each site. MSDGN panels were incubated at 35 ± 1(º)C and read on the WalkAway System, the autoSCAN-4 instrument, and visually. Read times for the MSDGN panels were at 16-20 hours. Frozen reference panels were prepared and read according to CLSI methodology. FDA and CLSI breakpoints (µg/mL) used for interpretation of MIC results were: Enterobacterales ≤ 0. 5 S, 1 I, ≥ 2 R; Salmonella spp. ≤ 0.12 S, 0.25-1 I, ≥ 2 R; P. aeruginosa ≤ 1 S, 2 I, ≥ 4 R. RESULTS: Essential and categorical agreement were calculated compared to frozen reference panel results. Results for isolates tested during efficacy and challenge with Prompt inoculation and manual read are as follows: CONCLUSION: Levofloxacin MIC results for Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp., and P. aeruginosa obtained with the MSDGN panel correlate well with MICs obtained using frozen reference panels using updated FDA/CLSI interpretive criteria in this multicenter study. * PROMPT(®) is a registered trademark of 3M Company, St. Paul, MN USA. BEC, the stylized logo and the BEC product and service marks mentioned herein are trademarks or registered trademarks of Beckman Coulter, Inc. in the US and other countries. DISCLOSURES: Omai Garner, PhD, D(ABMM), Beckman Coulter (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Maria M. Traczewski, BS MT (ASCP), Beckman Coulter (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Denise Beasley, BS, Beckman Coulter (Other Financial or Material Support, Research personnel) Amanda Harrington, PhD, Beckman Coulter (Scientific Research Study Investigator) Sharon DesJarlais, BS, Beckman Coulter (Other Financial or Material Support, Research personnel) Christine Hastey, PhD, Beckman Coulter (Employee) Regina Brookman, BS, Beckman Coulter (Employee) Zabrina Lockett, MS, Beckman Coulter (Employee) Jennifer Chau, PhD, Beckman Coulter (Employee) Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7776295/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.860 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Garner, Omai
Traczewski, Maria M
Beasley, Denise
Harrington, Amanda
DesJarlais, Sharon
Hastey, Christine
Brookman, Regina
Lockett, Zabrina
Chau, Jennifer
667. Multicenter Assessment of Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using Updated CLSI Levofloxacin Breakpoints on MicroScan Dried Gram Negative MIC Panels
title 667. Multicenter Assessment of Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using Updated CLSI Levofloxacin Breakpoints on MicroScan Dried Gram Negative MIC Panels
title_full 667. Multicenter Assessment of Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using Updated CLSI Levofloxacin Breakpoints on MicroScan Dried Gram Negative MIC Panels
title_fullStr 667. Multicenter Assessment of Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using Updated CLSI Levofloxacin Breakpoints on MicroScan Dried Gram Negative MIC Panels
title_full_unstemmed 667. Multicenter Assessment of Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using Updated CLSI Levofloxacin Breakpoints on MicroScan Dried Gram Negative MIC Panels
title_short 667. Multicenter Assessment of Enterobacterales, Salmonella spp. and Pseudomonas aeruginosa Using Updated CLSI Levofloxacin Breakpoints on MicroScan Dried Gram Negative MIC Panels
title_sort 667. multicenter assessment of enterobacterales, salmonella spp. and pseudomonas aeruginosa using updated clsi levofloxacin breakpoints on microscan dried gram negative mic panels
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776295/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.860
work_keys_str_mv AT garneromai 667multicenterassessmentofenterobacteralessalmonellasppandpseudomonasaeruginosausingupdatedclsilevofloxacinbreakpointsonmicroscandriedgramnegativemicpanels
AT traczewskimariam 667multicenterassessmentofenterobacteralessalmonellasppandpseudomonasaeruginosausingupdatedclsilevofloxacinbreakpointsonmicroscandriedgramnegativemicpanels
AT beasleydenise 667multicenterassessmentofenterobacteralessalmonellasppandpseudomonasaeruginosausingupdatedclsilevofloxacinbreakpointsonmicroscandriedgramnegativemicpanels
AT harringtonamanda 667multicenterassessmentofenterobacteralessalmonellasppandpseudomonasaeruginosausingupdatedclsilevofloxacinbreakpointsonmicroscandriedgramnegativemicpanels
AT desjarlaissharon 667multicenterassessmentofenterobacteralessalmonellasppandpseudomonasaeruginosausingupdatedclsilevofloxacinbreakpointsonmicroscandriedgramnegativemicpanels
AT hasteychristine 667multicenterassessmentofenterobacteralessalmonellasppandpseudomonasaeruginosausingupdatedclsilevofloxacinbreakpointsonmicroscandriedgramnegativemicpanels
AT brookmanregina 667multicenterassessmentofenterobacteralessalmonellasppandpseudomonasaeruginosausingupdatedclsilevofloxacinbreakpointsonmicroscandriedgramnegativemicpanels
AT lockettzabrina 667multicenterassessmentofenterobacteralessalmonellasppandpseudomonasaeruginosausingupdatedclsilevofloxacinbreakpointsonmicroscandriedgramnegativemicpanels
AT chaujennifer 667multicenterassessmentofenterobacteralessalmonellasppandpseudomonasaeruginosausingupdatedclsilevofloxacinbreakpointsonmicroscandriedgramnegativemicpanels