Cargando…

861. Evolution of Antifungal Use Over Fifteen Years in a Burn Intensive Care Unit

BACKGROUND: Systemic antifungals (AF) and surgery are the cornerstone of therapy for burn-related fungal infections. Multiple AFs were introduced in the last decade with broader spectrum and improved safety profiles, but use in burn patients has yet to be thoroughly described. Here we evaluate 15 ye...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Kiley, John L, Barsoumian, Alice, Giancola, Stephanie, Pruskowski, Kaitlin, Rizzo, Julie, Blyth, Dana M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776431/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1050
_version_ 1783630681669107712
author Kiley, John L
Barsoumian, Alice
Giancola, Stephanie
Pruskowski, Kaitlin
Rizzo, Julie
Blyth, Dana M
author_facet Kiley, John L
Barsoumian, Alice
Giancola, Stephanie
Pruskowski, Kaitlin
Rizzo, Julie
Blyth, Dana M
author_sort Kiley, John L
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Systemic antifungals (AF) and surgery are the cornerstone of therapy for burn-related fungal infections. Multiple AFs were introduced in the last decade with broader spectrum and improved safety profiles, but use in burn patients has yet to be thoroughly described. Here we evaluate 15 years of AF prescribing patterns in a burn intensive care unit (BICU). METHODS: We included all US Army Institute of Surgical Research BICU patients who received > 1 dose of AF from 2004-18. First we sought to describe overall AF prescribing. Clinical features, mortality and AF use (including in combination) from 2004-8 (T1), 2009-2013 (T2), 2014-18 (T3) were compared. RESULTS: Between 2004-18, 361 patients with a median total body surface area (TBSA) of 45% (IQR: 25-60) received AF. Median duration of hospital stay prior to and duration of initial AF (AF1) were 13.5 (IQR: 7-22) and 4 days (IQR: 2-9), respectively. Patients prescribed AF had a median of 2 (IQR 1-3) different AFs. AF1 was most commonly fluconazole [FLC; n=141 (39%)], amphotericin [AMB; n=62 (17%)] and voriconazole [VRC; n=55 (15%)]. Of those who survived, (N=233) AF1 was AMB, 40 (17.2%); FLC, 102 (43.8%); itraconazole, 1 (0.4%); VRC, 35 (15%); posaconazole (POS), 6 (2.6%); isavuconazole (ISA), 4 (1.7%); caspofungin (CAS), 7 (3%); micafungin (MFG), 28 (12%), VRC/AMB, 8 (3.4%); FLC/AMB, 0; FLC/CSP, 1 (0.4%); and VCR/MFG 1 (0.4%). AF1 use differed across T1, T2, and T3 (Table). Notably, there was shift towards use of POS, ISA, and MFG. The use of AF1 combination therapy differed across T1, T2, and T3 (p = 0.002). 200 patients had a second AF (AF2) prescribed at a median of 4.15 days (IQR 1.1-12.5) after AF1 for a median duration of 5.3 days (IQR 2-9.7). AF2 were most commonly VRC (n=54, 27%), AMB (n =46, 23%) and FLC (n=44, 22%). There were no differences in AF2 over time. Table. Clinical characteristics and antifungal use by five year increments [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: AF use evolved to include echinocandins and broader spectrum triazoles and decreased use of AMB as part of AF1. However, AF2 remained most commonly VRC, AMB, and FLC. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7776431
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77764312021-01-07 861. Evolution of Antifungal Use Over Fifteen Years in a Burn Intensive Care Unit Kiley, John L Barsoumian, Alice Giancola, Stephanie Pruskowski, Kaitlin Rizzo, Julie Blyth, Dana M Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Systemic antifungals (AF) and surgery are the cornerstone of therapy for burn-related fungal infections. Multiple AFs were introduced in the last decade with broader spectrum and improved safety profiles, but use in burn patients has yet to be thoroughly described. Here we evaluate 15 years of AF prescribing patterns in a burn intensive care unit (BICU). METHODS: We included all US Army Institute of Surgical Research BICU patients who received > 1 dose of AF from 2004-18. First we sought to describe overall AF prescribing. Clinical features, mortality and AF use (including in combination) from 2004-8 (T1), 2009-2013 (T2), 2014-18 (T3) were compared. RESULTS: Between 2004-18, 361 patients with a median total body surface area (TBSA) of 45% (IQR: 25-60) received AF. Median duration of hospital stay prior to and duration of initial AF (AF1) were 13.5 (IQR: 7-22) and 4 days (IQR: 2-9), respectively. Patients prescribed AF had a median of 2 (IQR 1-3) different AFs. AF1 was most commonly fluconazole [FLC; n=141 (39%)], amphotericin [AMB; n=62 (17%)] and voriconazole [VRC; n=55 (15%)]. Of those who survived, (N=233) AF1 was AMB, 40 (17.2%); FLC, 102 (43.8%); itraconazole, 1 (0.4%); VRC, 35 (15%); posaconazole (POS), 6 (2.6%); isavuconazole (ISA), 4 (1.7%); caspofungin (CAS), 7 (3%); micafungin (MFG), 28 (12%), VRC/AMB, 8 (3.4%); FLC/AMB, 0; FLC/CSP, 1 (0.4%); and VCR/MFG 1 (0.4%). AF1 use differed across T1, T2, and T3 (Table). Notably, there was shift towards use of POS, ISA, and MFG. The use of AF1 combination therapy differed across T1, T2, and T3 (p = 0.002). 200 patients had a second AF (AF2) prescribed at a median of 4.15 days (IQR 1.1-12.5) after AF1 for a median duration of 5.3 days (IQR 2-9.7). AF2 were most commonly VRC (n=54, 27%), AMB (n =46, 23%) and FLC (n=44, 22%). There were no differences in AF2 over time. Table. Clinical characteristics and antifungal use by five year increments [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: AF use evolved to include echinocandins and broader spectrum triazoles and decreased use of AMB as part of AF1. However, AF2 remained most commonly VRC, AMB, and FLC. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7776431/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1050 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Kiley, John L
Barsoumian, Alice
Giancola, Stephanie
Pruskowski, Kaitlin
Rizzo, Julie
Blyth, Dana M
861. Evolution of Antifungal Use Over Fifteen Years in a Burn Intensive Care Unit
title 861. Evolution of Antifungal Use Over Fifteen Years in a Burn Intensive Care Unit
title_full 861. Evolution of Antifungal Use Over Fifteen Years in a Burn Intensive Care Unit
title_fullStr 861. Evolution of Antifungal Use Over Fifteen Years in a Burn Intensive Care Unit
title_full_unstemmed 861. Evolution of Antifungal Use Over Fifteen Years in a Burn Intensive Care Unit
title_short 861. Evolution of Antifungal Use Over Fifteen Years in a Burn Intensive Care Unit
title_sort 861. evolution of antifungal use over fifteen years in a burn intensive care unit
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776431/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1050
work_keys_str_mv AT kileyjohnl 861evolutionofantifungaluseoverfifteenyearsinaburnintensivecareunit
AT barsoumianalice 861evolutionofantifungaluseoverfifteenyearsinaburnintensivecareunit
AT giancolastephanie 861evolutionofantifungaluseoverfifteenyearsinaburnintensivecareunit
AT pruskowskikaitlin 861evolutionofantifungaluseoverfifteenyearsinaburnintensivecareunit
AT rizzojulie 861evolutionofantifungaluseoverfifteenyearsinaburnintensivecareunit
AT blythdanam 861evolutionofantifungaluseoverfifteenyearsinaburnintensivecareunit