Cargando…

1167. Got Micafungin? The Incidence of Fungemia in Patients with Septic Shock

BACKGROUND: Timely administration of antibiotics in patients presenting with sepsis decreases mortality, however evidence evaluating empiric antifungal coverage has been inconclusive. Recent data have shown no mortality benefit of empiric antifungal therapy in patients with ICU-acquired sepsis. Desp...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Piche, Mackenzie, Campion, Maureen, Adeel, Alina
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776458/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1353
_version_ 1783630688167133184
author Piche, Mackenzie
Campion, Maureen
Adeel, Alina
author_facet Piche, Mackenzie
Campion, Maureen
Adeel, Alina
author_sort Piche, Mackenzie
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Timely administration of antibiotics in patients presenting with sepsis decreases mortality, however evidence evaluating empiric antifungal coverage has been inconclusive. Recent data have shown no mortality benefit of empiric antifungal therapy in patients with ICU-acquired sepsis. Despite the lack of data, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommends empiric coverage for all suspected pathogens, including fungi. The purpose of this study is to determine the frequency of concomitant septic shock and fungemia at UMass Memorial Medical Center, a large tertiary care center. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study that included adult patients with a discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock and/or fungemia admitted to UMMMC between October 2017 and October 2019. Patients with positive fungal blood cultures were further reviewed to identify if septic shock was present within 24 hours of blood culture collection. Additionally, risk factors for fungemia and 30-day mortality were assessed. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, cultures from outside hospitals, incarceration, and hospice care. RESULTS: In the analysis period, 4,253 patients had a discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock. There were 68 cases of fungemia. In total, 54 patients with fungemia were included after applying exclusion criteria. Of the 54 patients with fungemia, 8 patients (15.1%) met criteria for septic shock at the time of positive blood culture, while 81% met SIRS criteria. Of the 4,253 total patients, 0.19% had coexisting fungemia and septic shock. At 30 days, four patients (7.4%) with both septic shock and fungemia had expired out of 12 total deaths. Three of the four deaths had multiple risk factors for fungemia including central line in place for greater than 48 hours, parenteral nutrition, and prolonged antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSION: Septic shock is a rare presentation of fungemia. Most patients with septic shock and fungemia have known risk factors. Despite recommendations by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign to initiate therapy for all likely pathogens, including fungal species, the incidence of fungemia presenting as septic shock at our academic medical center was very low and does not appear to warrant empiric coverage. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7776458
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77764582021-01-07 1167. Got Micafungin? The Incidence of Fungemia in Patients with Septic Shock Piche, Mackenzie Campion, Maureen Adeel, Alina Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Timely administration of antibiotics in patients presenting with sepsis decreases mortality, however evidence evaluating empiric antifungal coverage has been inconclusive. Recent data have shown no mortality benefit of empiric antifungal therapy in patients with ICU-acquired sepsis. Despite the lack of data, the Surviving Sepsis Campaign recommends empiric coverage for all suspected pathogens, including fungi. The purpose of this study is to determine the frequency of concomitant septic shock and fungemia at UMass Memorial Medical Center, a large tertiary care center. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort study that included adult patients with a discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock and/or fungemia admitted to UMMMC between October 2017 and October 2019. Patients with positive fungal blood cultures were further reviewed to identify if septic shock was present within 24 hours of blood culture collection. Additionally, risk factors for fungemia and 30-day mortality were assessed. Exclusion criteria included pregnancy, cultures from outside hospitals, incarceration, and hospice care. RESULTS: In the analysis period, 4,253 patients had a discharge diagnosis of severe sepsis or septic shock. There were 68 cases of fungemia. In total, 54 patients with fungemia were included after applying exclusion criteria. Of the 54 patients with fungemia, 8 patients (15.1%) met criteria for septic shock at the time of positive blood culture, while 81% met SIRS criteria. Of the 4,253 total patients, 0.19% had coexisting fungemia and septic shock. At 30 days, four patients (7.4%) with both septic shock and fungemia had expired out of 12 total deaths. Three of the four deaths had multiple risk factors for fungemia including central line in place for greater than 48 hours, parenteral nutrition, and prolonged antibiotic therapy. CONCLUSION: Septic shock is a rare presentation of fungemia. Most patients with septic shock and fungemia have known risk factors. Despite recommendations by the Surviving Sepsis Campaign to initiate therapy for all likely pathogens, including fungal species, the incidence of fungemia presenting as septic shock at our academic medical center was very low and does not appear to warrant empiric coverage. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7776458/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1353 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Piche, Mackenzie
Campion, Maureen
Adeel, Alina
1167. Got Micafungin? The Incidence of Fungemia in Patients with Septic Shock
title 1167. Got Micafungin? The Incidence of Fungemia in Patients with Septic Shock
title_full 1167. Got Micafungin? The Incidence of Fungemia in Patients with Septic Shock
title_fullStr 1167. Got Micafungin? The Incidence of Fungemia in Patients with Septic Shock
title_full_unstemmed 1167. Got Micafungin? The Incidence of Fungemia in Patients with Septic Shock
title_short 1167. Got Micafungin? The Incidence of Fungemia in Patients with Septic Shock
title_sort 1167. got micafungin? the incidence of fungemia in patients with septic shock
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776458/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1353
work_keys_str_mv AT pichemackenzie 1167gotmicafungintheincidenceoffungemiainpatientswithsepticshock
AT campionmaureen 1167gotmicafungintheincidenceoffungemiainpatientswithsepticshock
AT adeelalina 1167gotmicafungintheincidenceoffungemiainpatientswithsepticshock