Cargando…

1204. The Effect of Coinfection with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease on Novel Biomarkers

BACKGROUND: Current literature presents conflicting results regarding the clinical manifestations of coinfection with Babesia microti (Babesiosis) and Borrelia burgdorferi (Lyme disease). The aim of this study is to investigate the effect that coinfection with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease has on stan...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Lum, Michael D, Reardon, Kelsey, Spector, Rachel, Garry, Evan, Papamanoli, Aikaterini, Marcos, Luis
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776468/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1389
_version_ 1783630690525380608
author Lum, Michael D
Reardon, Kelsey
Spector, Rachel
Garry, Evan
Papamanoli, Aikaterini
Marcos, Luis
author_facet Lum, Michael D
Reardon, Kelsey
Spector, Rachel
Garry, Evan
Papamanoli, Aikaterini
Marcos, Luis
author_sort Lum, Michael D
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current literature presents conflicting results regarding the clinical manifestations of coinfection with Babesia microti (Babesiosis) and Borrelia burgdorferi (Lyme disease). The aim of this study is to investigate the effect that coinfection with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease has on standard and novel biomarkers markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and procalcitonin (Pc), which may assist in elucidating how these pathogens interact within human hosts. METHODS: Babesia cases were collected from Stony Brook University Hospital from 2012 to 2019. Cases of Babesia were included if parasites were detected by peripheral blood smear and confirmed by PCR. Lyme disease diagnosis criteria involved 2-tier testing per CDC guidelines. Cases were divided into three cohorts based on if they had CRP, ESR or Pc tested. Cohorts were divided into two groups: Babesiosis alone vs coinfection with Lyme Disease. Median values were analyzed for the following biomarkers across both groups: parasitemia, hemoglobin (Hgb), white blood cells (WBC), platelets, indirect bilirubin (IB), lactate dehydrogenase, ESR, CRP and Pc. Fisher Exact and Wilcoxon Rank sum tests were used and P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: ESR values trended higher in monoinfection compared to coinfection (50 vs 36 mm/hr, p=0.63). Within this cohort, the coinfection group had significantly lower platelet values compared to monoinfection (52 vs. 75.5 K/uL, p=0.04, Table 1). Within the CRP and Pc cohorts, monoinfection had higher trends of parasitemia compared to coinfection (CRP group: 1.6 vs 0.7%, p=0.14, Pc group: 1.4 vs 0.7% p=1.0, Table 2&3). Pc levels were similar in both groups (1.1 vs 1.2 ng/mL, p=1.0, Table 3). Table 1: Demographics and Biomarkers for Patients with Babesiosis Monoinfection vs. Coinfection with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease that had ESR Measured. [Image: see text] Table 2: Demographics and Biomarkers for Patients with Babesiosis Monoinfection vs. Coinfection with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease that had CRP Measured. [Image: see text] Table 3: Demographics and Biomarkers for Patients with Babesiosis Alone vs Coinfection with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease that had Procalcitonin Measured. [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Coinfection had significantly lower platelets within the ESR cohort but not in other cohorts. While not statistically significant, monoinfection showed greater trends of ESR and parasitemia, which is consistent with previous studies that suggest that B. burgdorferi may mitigate the effects of B. microti infection. CRP and Pc levels were similar across both groups suggesting that the utility of using novel biomarkers to elucidate the interaction between B. burgdorferi and B. microti during simultaneous infection requires further study. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7776468
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77764682021-01-07 1204. The Effect of Coinfection with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease on Novel Biomarkers Lum, Michael D Reardon, Kelsey Spector, Rachel Garry, Evan Papamanoli, Aikaterini Marcos, Luis Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Current literature presents conflicting results regarding the clinical manifestations of coinfection with Babesia microti (Babesiosis) and Borrelia burgdorferi (Lyme disease). The aim of this study is to investigate the effect that coinfection with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease has on standard and novel biomarkers markers such as C-reactive protein (CRP), erythrocyte sedimentation rate (ESR) and procalcitonin (Pc), which may assist in elucidating how these pathogens interact within human hosts. METHODS: Babesia cases were collected from Stony Brook University Hospital from 2012 to 2019. Cases of Babesia were included if parasites were detected by peripheral blood smear and confirmed by PCR. Lyme disease diagnosis criteria involved 2-tier testing per CDC guidelines. Cases were divided into three cohorts based on if they had CRP, ESR or Pc tested. Cohorts were divided into two groups: Babesiosis alone vs coinfection with Lyme Disease. Median values were analyzed for the following biomarkers across both groups: parasitemia, hemoglobin (Hgb), white blood cells (WBC), platelets, indirect bilirubin (IB), lactate dehydrogenase, ESR, CRP and Pc. Fisher Exact and Wilcoxon Rank sum tests were used and P values < 0.05 were considered statistically significant. RESULTS: ESR values trended higher in monoinfection compared to coinfection (50 vs 36 mm/hr, p=0.63). Within this cohort, the coinfection group had significantly lower platelet values compared to monoinfection (52 vs. 75.5 K/uL, p=0.04, Table 1). Within the CRP and Pc cohorts, monoinfection had higher trends of parasitemia compared to coinfection (CRP group: 1.6 vs 0.7%, p=0.14, Pc group: 1.4 vs 0.7% p=1.0, Table 2&3). Pc levels were similar in both groups (1.1 vs 1.2 ng/mL, p=1.0, Table 3). Table 1: Demographics and Biomarkers for Patients with Babesiosis Monoinfection vs. Coinfection with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease that had ESR Measured. [Image: see text] Table 2: Demographics and Biomarkers for Patients with Babesiosis Monoinfection vs. Coinfection with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease that had CRP Measured. [Image: see text] Table 3: Demographics and Biomarkers for Patients with Babesiosis Alone vs Coinfection with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease that had Procalcitonin Measured. [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Coinfection had significantly lower platelets within the ESR cohort but not in other cohorts. While not statistically significant, monoinfection showed greater trends of ESR and parasitemia, which is consistent with previous studies that suggest that B. burgdorferi may mitigate the effects of B. microti infection. CRP and Pc levels were similar across both groups suggesting that the utility of using novel biomarkers to elucidate the interaction between B. burgdorferi and B. microti during simultaneous infection requires further study. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7776468/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1389 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Lum, Michael D
Reardon, Kelsey
Spector, Rachel
Garry, Evan
Papamanoli, Aikaterini
Marcos, Luis
1204. The Effect of Coinfection with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease on Novel Biomarkers
title 1204. The Effect of Coinfection with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease on Novel Biomarkers
title_full 1204. The Effect of Coinfection with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease on Novel Biomarkers
title_fullStr 1204. The Effect of Coinfection with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease on Novel Biomarkers
title_full_unstemmed 1204. The Effect of Coinfection with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease on Novel Biomarkers
title_short 1204. The Effect of Coinfection with Babesiosis and Lyme Disease on Novel Biomarkers
title_sort 1204. the effect of coinfection with babesiosis and lyme disease on novel biomarkers
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776468/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1389
work_keys_str_mv AT lummichaeld 1204theeffectofcoinfectionwithbabesiosisandlymediseaseonnovelbiomarkers
AT reardonkelsey 1204theeffectofcoinfectionwithbabesiosisandlymediseaseonnovelbiomarkers
AT spectorrachel 1204theeffectofcoinfectionwithbabesiosisandlymediseaseonnovelbiomarkers
AT garryevan 1204theeffectofcoinfectionwithbabesiosisandlymediseaseonnovelbiomarkers
AT papamanoliaikaterini 1204theeffectofcoinfectionwithbabesiosisandlymediseaseonnovelbiomarkers
AT marcosluis 1204theeffectofcoinfectionwithbabesiosisandlymediseaseonnovelbiomarkers