Cargando…

739. A Two-Center Assessment of Histopathologic Diagnostic Performance for Fungal Organism Identification

BACKGROUND: Accurate detection and identification of invasive fungal pathogens relies on concordance of several complementary laboratory techniques, including fungal culture, serology, and histopathologic identification. Histopathologic stains such as the Gomori methenamine silver stain (GMS) are us...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Costales, Cristina R, Butler-Wu, Susan, She, Rosemary
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776488/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.930
_version_ 1783630695386578944
author Costales, Cristina R
Butler-Wu, Susan
She, Rosemary
author_facet Costales, Cristina R
Butler-Wu, Susan
She, Rosemary
author_sort Costales, Cristina R
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Accurate detection and identification of invasive fungal pathogens relies on concordance of several complementary laboratory techniques, including fungal culture, serology, and histopathologic identification. Histopathologic stains such as the Gomori methenamine silver stain (GMS) are used to highlight fungal cell wall in tissue specimens. We sought to determine the diagnostic performance of histopathology fungal stains as compared to fungal culture for diagnosis of invasive fungal tissue infection at tertiary medical centers with dissimilar patient populations. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all surgical pathology specimens with reported GMS results and concurrent fungal culture at Keck Medical Center (Keck) and Los Angeles County + USC Medical Center (LAC). Ratios of GMS diagnostic performance were compared using chi-squared analyses, with fungal culture as the gold standard for detection. RESULTS: Of 1347 LAC surgical pathology specimens stained with GMS to evaluate for fungal infection, 229 (17.0%) had concurrent tissue specimens submitted for fungal culture. Of 1546 Keck GMS-stained surgical pathology specimens, 358 (23.2%) had concurrent tissue for fungal culture. GMS stain performance at LAC showed a sensitivity of 53.7% (95% CI: 37.4-69.3%) and specificity of 90.4% (95% CI: 85.2-94.2%). At Keck, GMS showed a sensitivity of 64.1% (95% CI: 52.4-74.7%), specificity of 88.9% (95% CI: 84.7-92.4%), without significant difference in performance between sites, (p=0.27) and (p=0.62), respectively. Among filamentous fungi, GMS false negative frequency at LAC was 5.3% (10/190) and 4.0% (11/277) at Keck, without significant difference (p=0.51). A subset of pathology reports suggested the fungus genus based on histologic morphology. Of 10 LAC pathology specimens with fungal genus specified, 2 (20.0%) reports gave the incorrect genus and 8/18 (44.4%) reports at Keck gave incorrect genus as per concurrent culture isolate result. Table 1. Diagnostic performance of GMS histopathology stain on surgical pathology specimens compared to tissue fungal culture at LAC and Keck Medical Centers from July 2015 through December 2018. [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: GMS stain had low-to-moderate sensitivity when compared to fungal tissue culture. Increased submission of concurrent tissue for fungal culture is likely to improve detection. When genus level identification was attempted, fungal forms were incorrectly identified in about one-third of histopathology specimens. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7776488
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77764882021-01-07 739. A Two-Center Assessment of Histopathologic Diagnostic Performance for Fungal Organism Identification Costales, Cristina R Butler-Wu, Susan She, Rosemary Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Accurate detection and identification of invasive fungal pathogens relies on concordance of several complementary laboratory techniques, including fungal culture, serology, and histopathologic identification. Histopathologic stains such as the Gomori methenamine silver stain (GMS) are used to highlight fungal cell wall in tissue specimens. We sought to determine the diagnostic performance of histopathology fungal stains as compared to fungal culture for diagnosis of invasive fungal tissue infection at tertiary medical centers with dissimilar patient populations. METHODS: We performed a retrospective review of all surgical pathology specimens with reported GMS results and concurrent fungal culture at Keck Medical Center (Keck) and Los Angeles County + USC Medical Center (LAC). Ratios of GMS diagnostic performance were compared using chi-squared analyses, with fungal culture as the gold standard for detection. RESULTS: Of 1347 LAC surgical pathology specimens stained with GMS to evaluate for fungal infection, 229 (17.0%) had concurrent tissue specimens submitted for fungal culture. Of 1546 Keck GMS-stained surgical pathology specimens, 358 (23.2%) had concurrent tissue for fungal culture. GMS stain performance at LAC showed a sensitivity of 53.7% (95% CI: 37.4-69.3%) and specificity of 90.4% (95% CI: 85.2-94.2%). At Keck, GMS showed a sensitivity of 64.1% (95% CI: 52.4-74.7%), specificity of 88.9% (95% CI: 84.7-92.4%), without significant difference in performance between sites, (p=0.27) and (p=0.62), respectively. Among filamentous fungi, GMS false negative frequency at LAC was 5.3% (10/190) and 4.0% (11/277) at Keck, without significant difference (p=0.51). A subset of pathology reports suggested the fungus genus based on histologic morphology. Of 10 LAC pathology specimens with fungal genus specified, 2 (20.0%) reports gave the incorrect genus and 8/18 (44.4%) reports at Keck gave incorrect genus as per concurrent culture isolate result. Table 1. Diagnostic performance of GMS histopathology stain on surgical pathology specimens compared to tissue fungal culture at LAC and Keck Medical Centers from July 2015 through December 2018. [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: GMS stain had low-to-moderate sensitivity when compared to fungal tissue culture. Increased submission of concurrent tissue for fungal culture is likely to improve detection. When genus level identification was attempted, fungal forms were incorrectly identified in about one-third of histopathology specimens. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7776488/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.930 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Costales, Cristina R
Butler-Wu, Susan
She, Rosemary
739. A Two-Center Assessment of Histopathologic Diagnostic Performance for Fungal Organism Identification
title 739. A Two-Center Assessment of Histopathologic Diagnostic Performance for Fungal Organism Identification
title_full 739. A Two-Center Assessment of Histopathologic Diagnostic Performance for Fungal Organism Identification
title_fullStr 739. A Two-Center Assessment of Histopathologic Diagnostic Performance for Fungal Organism Identification
title_full_unstemmed 739. A Two-Center Assessment of Histopathologic Diagnostic Performance for Fungal Organism Identification
title_short 739. A Two-Center Assessment of Histopathologic Diagnostic Performance for Fungal Organism Identification
title_sort 739. a two-center assessment of histopathologic diagnostic performance for fungal organism identification
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776488/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.930
work_keys_str_mv AT costalescristinar 739atwocenterassessmentofhistopathologicdiagnosticperformanceforfungalorganismidentification
AT butlerwususan 739atwocenterassessmentofhistopathologicdiagnosticperformanceforfungalorganismidentification
AT sherosemary 739atwocenterassessmentofhistopathologicdiagnosticperformanceforfungalorganismidentification