Cargando…
1414. #Vaccine Twitter Influencers: is it Just About Reach and Followers?
BACKGROUND: A small number of powerful users (“influencers”) dominates conversations on social media platforms: less than 1% of Twitter accounts have at least 3,000 followers and even fewer have hundreds of thousands or millions of followers. Beyond simple metrics (number of tweets, retweets...) lit...
Autores principales: | , , , , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776496/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1596 |
_version_ | 1783630697441787904 |
---|---|
author | Poirrier, Jean-Etienne Caputi, Theodore Ayers, John Dredze, Mark Poston, Sara Hogea, Cosmina |
author_facet | Poirrier, Jean-Etienne Caputi, Theodore Ayers, John Dredze, Mark Poston, Sara Hogea, Cosmina |
author_sort | Poirrier, Jean-Etienne |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: A small number of powerful users (“influencers”) dominates conversations on social media platforms: less than 1% of Twitter accounts have at least 3,000 followers and even fewer have hundreds of thousands or millions of followers. Beyond simple metrics (number of tweets, retweets...) little is known about these “influencers”, particularly in relation to their role in shaping online narratives about vaccines. Our goal was to describe influential Twitter accounts that are driving conversations about vaccines and present new metrics of influence. METHODS: Using publicly-available data from Twitter, we selected posts from 1-Jan-2016 to 31-Dec-2018 and extracted the top 5% of accounts tweeting about vaccines with the most followers. Using automated classifiers, we determined the location of these accounts, and grouped them into those that primarily tweet pro- versus anti-vaccine content. We further characterized the demographics of these influencer accounts. RESULTS: From 25,381 vaccine-related tweets available in our sample representing 10,607 users, 530 accounts represented the top 5% by number of followers. These accounts had on average 1,608,637 followers (standard deviation=5,063,421) and 340,390 median followers. Among the accounts for which sentiment was successfully estimated by the classifier, 10.4% (n=55) posted anti-vaccine content and 33.6% (n=178) posted pro-vaccine content. Of the 55 anti-vaccine accounts, 50% (n=18) of the accounts for which location was successfully determined were from the United States. Of the 178 pro-vaccine accounts, 42.5% (n=54) were from the United States. CONCLUSION: This study showed that only a small proportion of Twitter accounts (A) post about vaccines and (B) have a high follower count and post anti-vaccine content. Further analysis of these users may help researchers and policy makers better understand how to amplify the impact of pro-vaccine social media messages. DISCLOSURES: Jean-Etienne Poirrier, PhD, MBA, The GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Theodore Caputi, PhD, Good Analytics Inc. (Consultant) John Ayers, PhD, GSK (Grant/Research Support) Mark Dredze, PhD, Bloomberg LP (Consultant)Good Analytics (Consultant) Sara Poston, PharmD, The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Cosmina Hogea, PhD, GlaxoSmithKline (Employee, Shareholder) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7776496 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77764962021-01-07 1414. #Vaccine Twitter Influencers: is it Just About Reach and Followers? Poirrier, Jean-Etienne Caputi, Theodore Ayers, John Dredze, Mark Poston, Sara Hogea, Cosmina Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: A small number of powerful users (“influencers”) dominates conversations on social media platforms: less than 1% of Twitter accounts have at least 3,000 followers and even fewer have hundreds of thousands or millions of followers. Beyond simple metrics (number of tweets, retweets...) little is known about these “influencers”, particularly in relation to their role in shaping online narratives about vaccines. Our goal was to describe influential Twitter accounts that are driving conversations about vaccines and present new metrics of influence. METHODS: Using publicly-available data from Twitter, we selected posts from 1-Jan-2016 to 31-Dec-2018 and extracted the top 5% of accounts tweeting about vaccines with the most followers. Using automated classifiers, we determined the location of these accounts, and grouped them into those that primarily tweet pro- versus anti-vaccine content. We further characterized the demographics of these influencer accounts. RESULTS: From 25,381 vaccine-related tweets available in our sample representing 10,607 users, 530 accounts represented the top 5% by number of followers. These accounts had on average 1,608,637 followers (standard deviation=5,063,421) and 340,390 median followers. Among the accounts for which sentiment was successfully estimated by the classifier, 10.4% (n=55) posted anti-vaccine content and 33.6% (n=178) posted pro-vaccine content. Of the 55 anti-vaccine accounts, 50% (n=18) of the accounts for which location was successfully determined were from the United States. Of the 178 pro-vaccine accounts, 42.5% (n=54) were from the United States. CONCLUSION: This study showed that only a small proportion of Twitter accounts (A) post about vaccines and (B) have a high follower count and post anti-vaccine content. Further analysis of these users may help researchers and policy makers better understand how to amplify the impact of pro-vaccine social media messages. DISCLOSURES: Jean-Etienne Poirrier, PhD, MBA, The GSK group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Theodore Caputi, PhD, Good Analytics Inc. (Consultant) John Ayers, PhD, GSK (Grant/Research Support) Mark Dredze, PhD, Bloomberg LP (Consultant)Good Analytics (Consultant) Sara Poston, PharmD, The GlaxoSmithKline group of companies (Employee, Shareholder) Cosmina Hogea, PhD, GlaxoSmithKline (Employee, Shareholder) Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7776496/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1596 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Poster Abstracts Poirrier, Jean-Etienne Caputi, Theodore Ayers, John Dredze, Mark Poston, Sara Hogea, Cosmina 1414. #Vaccine Twitter Influencers: is it Just About Reach and Followers? |
title | 1414. #Vaccine Twitter Influencers: is it Just About Reach and Followers? |
title_full | 1414. #Vaccine Twitter Influencers: is it Just About Reach and Followers? |
title_fullStr | 1414. #Vaccine Twitter Influencers: is it Just About Reach and Followers? |
title_full_unstemmed | 1414. #Vaccine Twitter Influencers: is it Just About Reach and Followers? |
title_short | 1414. #Vaccine Twitter Influencers: is it Just About Reach and Followers? |
title_sort | 1414. #vaccine twitter influencers: is it just about reach and followers? |
topic | Poster Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776496/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1596 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT poirrierjeanetienne 1414vaccinetwitterinfluencersisitjustaboutreachandfollowers AT caputitheodore 1414vaccinetwitterinfluencersisitjustaboutreachandfollowers AT ayersjohn 1414vaccinetwitterinfluencersisitjustaboutreachandfollowers AT dredzemark 1414vaccinetwitterinfluencersisitjustaboutreachandfollowers AT postonsara 1414vaccinetwitterinfluencersisitjustaboutreachandfollowers AT hogeacosmina 1414vaccinetwitterinfluencersisitjustaboutreachandfollowers |