Cargando…

1124. Increasing Student Confidence in Antimicrobial Prescribing with a Novel Teaching Framework

BACKGROUND: Physicians frequently prescribe antimicrobials inappropriately, increasing rates of resistance and adverse effects. Difficulty with antimicrobial reasoning likely begins during medical school, where many students learn infectious diseases by memorization. Past work has shown that learner...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sheffield, Virginia, Abdoler, Emily
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776541/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1310
_version_ 1783630708341735424
author Sheffield, Virginia
Abdoler, Emily
author_facet Sheffield, Virginia
Abdoler, Emily
author_sort Sheffield, Virginia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Physicians frequently prescribe antimicrobials inappropriately, increasing rates of resistance and adverse effects. Difficulty with antimicrobial reasoning likely begins during medical school, where many students learn infectious diseases by memorization. Past work has shown that learners benefit from tools such as schema and checklists. We report our experience using an antimicrobial reasoning teaching tool in a pilot medical student workshop. Figure 1: Antimicrobial Selection Tool [Image: see text] Figure 2: Usefulness of Session and Tool [Image: see text] METHODS: We converted a published antimicrobial reasoning framework into a teaching tool (Fig 1). Students enrolled in the 2020 Internal Medicine Residency Preparation Course participated in one of two identical hour-long antimicrobial reasoning workshops. We started with an interactive didactic introducing the tool. Students used the tool to work through a clinical vignette in small groups, followed by a facilitated discussion. Students filled out pre- and post-surveys assessing their identification of factors impacting antimicrobial selection, and their self-efficacy regarding antimicrobial selection. The number of factors identified was analyzed using a t-test, while the change in self-efficacy scores was analyzed using a paired t-test. Students also rated the utility of the session. RESULTS: 87% of students (52/60) completed surveys. Prior to the session, only 59% (n=29) of students felt prepared to prescribe antimicrobials and the majority of students (59%, n=30) felt less confident managing infections than other conditions. After the session, there was a significant increase in students’ perception of their preparation to prescribe antimicrobials (t=2.08, p=0.04) and ability to identify factors important to antimicrobial selection (t=2.13, p=0.036). The majority of students found both the session and tool to be useful for future practice (Fig 2). CONCLUSION: At baseline, medical students feel unprepared to prescribe antimicrobials and are less confident managing infections than other conditions. This workshop assessed the feasibility of using an antimicrobial reasoning tool to teach students. Despite its brevity, students felt more prepared to prescribe antimicrobials after the session and rated it as useful for future practice. They felt a simpler tool and longer session would improve future efforts. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7776541
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77765412021-01-07 1124. Increasing Student Confidence in Antimicrobial Prescribing with a Novel Teaching Framework Sheffield, Virginia Abdoler, Emily Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Physicians frequently prescribe antimicrobials inappropriately, increasing rates of resistance and adverse effects. Difficulty with antimicrobial reasoning likely begins during medical school, where many students learn infectious diseases by memorization. Past work has shown that learners benefit from tools such as schema and checklists. We report our experience using an antimicrobial reasoning teaching tool in a pilot medical student workshop. Figure 1: Antimicrobial Selection Tool [Image: see text] Figure 2: Usefulness of Session and Tool [Image: see text] METHODS: We converted a published antimicrobial reasoning framework into a teaching tool (Fig 1). Students enrolled in the 2020 Internal Medicine Residency Preparation Course participated in one of two identical hour-long antimicrobial reasoning workshops. We started with an interactive didactic introducing the tool. Students used the tool to work through a clinical vignette in small groups, followed by a facilitated discussion. Students filled out pre- and post-surveys assessing their identification of factors impacting antimicrobial selection, and their self-efficacy regarding antimicrobial selection. The number of factors identified was analyzed using a t-test, while the change in self-efficacy scores was analyzed using a paired t-test. Students also rated the utility of the session. RESULTS: 87% of students (52/60) completed surveys. Prior to the session, only 59% (n=29) of students felt prepared to prescribe antimicrobials and the majority of students (59%, n=30) felt less confident managing infections than other conditions. After the session, there was a significant increase in students’ perception of their preparation to prescribe antimicrobials (t=2.08, p=0.04) and ability to identify factors important to antimicrobial selection (t=2.13, p=0.036). The majority of students found both the session and tool to be useful for future practice (Fig 2). CONCLUSION: At baseline, medical students feel unprepared to prescribe antimicrobials and are less confident managing infections than other conditions. This workshop assessed the feasibility of using an antimicrobial reasoning tool to teach students. Despite its brevity, students felt more prepared to prescribe antimicrobials after the session and rated it as useful for future practice. They felt a simpler tool and longer session would improve future efforts. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7776541/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1310 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Sheffield, Virginia
Abdoler, Emily
1124. Increasing Student Confidence in Antimicrobial Prescribing with a Novel Teaching Framework
title 1124. Increasing Student Confidence in Antimicrobial Prescribing with a Novel Teaching Framework
title_full 1124. Increasing Student Confidence in Antimicrobial Prescribing with a Novel Teaching Framework
title_fullStr 1124. Increasing Student Confidence in Antimicrobial Prescribing with a Novel Teaching Framework
title_full_unstemmed 1124. Increasing Student Confidence in Antimicrobial Prescribing with a Novel Teaching Framework
title_short 1124. Increasing Student Confidence in Antimicrobial Prescribing with a Novel Teaching Framework
title_sort 1124. increasing student confidence in antimicrobial prescribing with a novel teaching framework
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776541/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1310
work_keys_str_mv AT sheffieldvirginia 1124increasingstudentconfidenceinantimicrobialprescribingwithanovelteachingframework
AT abdoleremily 1124increasingstudentconfidenceinantimicrobialprescribingwithanovelteachingframework