Cargando…

1326. Vancomycin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) Estimation Using a Bayesian Approach Versus First-Order Pharmacokinetic Equations: A Pilot Study

BACKGROUND: Current guidelines endorse area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)-based monitoring over trough-only monitoring for systemic vancomycin. Vancomycin AUC can be estimated using either Bayesian modeling software or first-order pharmacokinetic (PK) calculations. The objective of this p...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Pearson, Jeffrey, Alsowaida, Yazed S, Pharm, B S, Kubiak, David W, Kovacevic, Mary P, Dionne, Brandon
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776547/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1508
_version_ 1783630709778284544
author Pearson, Jeffrey
Alsowaida, Yazed S
Pharm, B S
Kubiak, David W
Kovacevic, Mary P
Dionne, Brandon
author_facet Pearson, Jeffrey
Alsowaida, Yazed S
Pharm, B S
Kubiak, David W
Kovacevic, Mary P
Dionne, Brandon
author_sort Pearson, Jeffrey
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Current guidelines endorse area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)-based monitoring over trough-only monitoring for systemic vancomycin. Vancomycin AUC can be estimated using either Bayesian modeling software or first-order pharmacokinetic (PK) calculations. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate and compare the efficiency and feasibility of these two approaches for calculating the estimated vancomycin AUC. METHODS: A single-center crossover study was conducted in four medical/surgical units at Brigham and Women’s Hospital over a 3-month time period. All adult patients who received vancomycin were included. Patients were excluded if they were receiving vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis, were on hemodialysis, if vancomycin was being dosed by level, or if vancomycin levels were never drawn. The primary endpoint was the amount of time study team members spent calculating the estimated AUC and determining regimen adjustments with Bayesian modeling compared to first-order PK calculations. Secondary endpoints included the number of vancomycin levels drawn and the percent of those drawn that were usable for AUC calculations. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-four patients received vancomycin during the study, of whom 47 met inclusion criteria. The most likely reasons for exclusion were receiving vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis (n=40) or never having vancomycin levels drawn (n=32). The median time taken to assess levels in the Bayesian arm was 9.3 minutes [interquartile range (IQR) 7.8-12.4] versus 6.8 minutes (IQR 4.8-8.0) in the 2-level PK arm (p=0.004). However, if Bayesian software is integrated into the electronic health record (EHR), the median time to assess levels was 3.8 minutes (IQR 2.3-6.8, p=0.019). In the Bayesian arm, 30 of 34 vancomycin levels (88.2%) were usable for AUC calculations, compared to 28 of 58 (48.3%) in the 2-level PK arm. CONCLUSION: With EHR integration, the use of Bayesian software to calculate the AUC was more efficient than first-order PK calculations. Additionally, vancomycin levels were more likely to be usable in the Bayesian arm, thereby avoiding delays in estimating the vancomycin AUC. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7776547
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77765472021-01-07 1326. Vancomycin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) Estimation Using a Bayesian Approach Versus First-Order Pharmacokinetic Equations: A Pilot Study Pearson, Jeffrey Alsowaida, Yazed S Pharm, B S Kubiak, David W Kovacevic, Mary P Dionne, Brandon Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Current guidelines endorse area under the concentration-time curve (AUC)-based monitoring over trough-only monitoring for systemic vancomycin. Vancomycin AUC can be estimated using either Bayesian modeling software or first-order pharmacokinetic (PK) calculations. The objective of this pilot study was to evaluate and compare the efficiency and feasibility of these two approaches for calculating the estimated vancomycin AUC. METHODS: A single-center crossover study was conducted in four medical/surgical units at Brigham and Women’s Hospital over a 3-month time period. All adult patients who received vancomycin were included. Patients were excluded if they were receiving vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis, were on hemodialysis, if vancomycin was being dosed by level, or if vancomycin levels were never drawn. The primary endpoint was the amount of time study team members spent calculating the estimated AUC and determining regimen adjustments with Bayesian modeling compared to first-order PK calculations. Secondary endpoints included the number of vancomycin levels drawn and the percent of those drawn that were usable for AUC calculations. RESULTS: One hundred twenty-four patients received vancomycin during the study, of whom 47 met inclusion criteria. The most likely reasons for exclusion were receiving vancomycin for surgical prophylaxis (n=40) or never having vancomycin levels drawn (n=32). The median time taken to assess levels in the Bayesian arm was 9.3 minutes [interquartile range (IQR) 7.8-12.4] versus 6.8 minutes (IQR 4.8-8.0) in the 2-level PK arm (p=0.004). However, if Bayesian software is integrated into the electronic health record (EHR), the median time to assess levels was 3.8 minutes (IQR 2.3-6.8, p=0.019). In the Bayesian arm, 30 of 34 vancomycin levels (88.2%) were usable for AUC calculations, compared to 28 of 58 (48.3%) in the 2-level PK arm. CONCLUSION: With EHR integration, the use of Bayesian software to calculate the AUC was more efficient than first-order PK calculations. Additionally, vancomycin levels were more likely to be usable in the Bayesian arm, thereby avoiding delays in estimating the vancomycin AUC. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7776547/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1508 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Pearson, Jeffrey
Alsowaida, Yazed S
Pharm, B S
Kubiak, David W
Kovacevic, Mary P
Dionne, Brandon
1326. Vancomycin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) Estimation Using a Bayesian Approach Versus First-Order Pharmacokinetic Equations: A Pilot Study
title 1326. Vancomycin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) Estimation Using a Bayesian Approach Versus First-Order Pharmacokinetic Equations: A Pilot Study
title_full 1326. Vancomycin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) Estimation Using a Bayesian Approach Versus First-Order Pharmacokinetic Equations: A Pilot Study
title_fullStr 1326. Vancomycin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) Estimation Using a Bayesian Approach Versus First-Order Pharmacokinetic Equations: A Pilot Study
title_full_unstemmed 1326. Vancomycin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) Estimation Using a Bayesian Approach Versus First-Order Pharmacokinetic Equations: A Pilot Study
title_short 1326. Vancomycin Area Under the Concentration-Time Curve (AUC) Estimation Using a Bayesian Approach Versus First-Order Pharmacokinetic Equations: A Pilot Study
title_sort 1326. vancomycin area under the concentration-time curve (auc) estimation using a bayesian approach versus first-order pharmacokinetic equations: a pilot study
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776547/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1508
work_keys_str_mv AT pearsonjeffrey 1326vancomycinareaundertheconcentrationtimecurveaucestimationusingabayesianapproachversusfirstorderpharmacokineticequationsapilotstudy
AT alsowaidayazeds 1326vancomycinareaundertheconcentrationtimecurveaucestimationusingabayesianapproachversusfirstorderpharmacokineticequationsapilotstudy
AT pharmbs 1326vancomycinareaundertheconcentrationtimecurveaucestimationusingabayesianapproachversusfirstorderpharmacokineticequationsapilotstudy
AT kubiakdavidw 1326vancomycinareaundertheconcentrationtimecurveaucestimationusingabayesianapproachversusfirstorderpharmacokineticequationsapilotstudy
AT kovacevicmaryp 1326vancomycinareaundertheconcentrationtimecurveaucestimationusingabayesianapproachversusfirstorderpharmacokineticequationsapilotstudy
AT dionnebrandon 1326vancomycinareaundertheconcentrationtimecurveaucestimationusingabayesianapproachversusfirstorderpharmacokineticequationsapilotstudy