Cargando…

177. Implementation of Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin Allergy Evaluation and Testing with a Focus on Bypassing Penicillin Skin Testing at an Academic Medical Center

BACKGROUND: Penicillin allergies are reported by approximately 10% of the US population; however, studies reveal that >90% of those patients can tolerate penicillins. Penicillin allergies are associated with negative health outcomes, both clinical and financial, due to reduced efficacy and increa...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Ham, YoungYoon, Joshi, Shyam, Sukerman, Ellie, Tucker, Kendall J, Yu, Diana, Lewis, James
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776714/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.221
_version_ 1783630746496270336
author Ham, YoungYoon
Joshi, Shyam
Sukerman, Ellie
Tucker, Kendall J
Yu, Diana
Lewis, James
author_facet Ham, YoungYoon
Joshi, Shyam
Sukerman, Ellie
Tucker, Kendall J
Yu, Diana
Lewis, James
author_sort Ham, YoungYoon
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Penicillin allergies are reported by approximately 10% of the US population; however, studies reveal that >90% of those patients can tolerate penicillins. Penicillin allergies are associated with negative health outcomes, both clinical and financial, due to reduced efficacy and increased adverse effects of alternative antibiotics. Patient interview, penicillin skin testing (PST) and/or an oral graded challenge can be used to evaluate penicillin allergies. Different facilities use various algorithms for testing. The objective of this project was to determine whether a pharmacist-driven penicillin allergy evaluation and testing protocol which largely bypasses PST could safely de-label patients. METHODS: Adult patients (≥18 years) admitted with a penicillin allergy were evaluated for eligibility between September 2019 and June 2020. Pregnant patients, critically-ill patients, and patients receiving test-invalidating medication were excluded. Patients were evaluated and tested using institutional protocols, which allowed for the majority of patients to be challenged without PST. Allergies were removed with standardized documentation, and patients were given a pamphlet and counseled to discourage relabeling. Data collected included but were not limited to, the number of patients challenged and de-labeled, number of patients who were relabeled, and number of patients whose change in allergy status resulted in change of therapy. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were interviewed and evaluated. One patient was evaluated by PST and oral graded challenge while 27 patients underwent an oral graded challenge only. Twenty patients were de-labeled as a result of patient interview. One patient failed oral challenge with minor itching that did not require any treatment, while 27 patients passed. Forty-seven allergies were removed or modified. Two patients who were de-labeled were relabeled with no record of a new reaction. Of de-labeled patients, 50% received a penicillin following removal of the allergy. CONCLUSION: Penicillin allergies can be evaluated and removed using a pharmacy-driven algorithm that prioritizes direct challenges when appropriate. Risks of a reaction are low, and removal leads to change in treatment in a significant portion of patients. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7776714
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77767142021-01-07 177. Implementation of Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin Allergy Evaluation and Testing with a Focus on Bypassing Penicillin Skin Testing at an Academic Medical Center Ham, YoungYoon Joshi, Shyam Sukerman, Ellie Tucker, Kendall J Yu, Diana Lewis, James Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Penicillin allergies are reported by approximately 10% of the US population; however, studies reveal that >90% of those patients can tolerate penicillins. Penicillin allergies are associated with negative health outcomes, both clinical and financial, due to reduced efficacy and increased adverse effects of alternative antibiotics. Patient interview, penicillin skin testing (PST) and/or an oral graded challenge can be used to evaluate penicillin allergies. Different facilities use various algorithms for testing. The objective of this project was to determine whether a pharmacist-driven penicillin allergy evaluation and testing protocol which largely bypasses PST could safely de-label patients. METHODS: Adult patients (≥18 years) admitted with a penicillin allergy were evaluated for eligibility between September 2019 and June 2020. Pregnant patients, critically-ill patients, and patients receiving test-invalidating medication were excluded. Patients were evaluated and tested using institutional protocols, which allowed for the majority of patients to be challenged without PST. Allergies were removed with standardized documentation, and patients were given a pamphlet and counseled to discourage relabeling. Data collected included but were not limited to, the number of patients challenged and de-labeled, number of patients who were relabeled, and number of patients whose change in allergy status resulted in change of therapy. RESULTS: Forty-eight patients were interviewed and evaluated. One patient was evaluated by PST and oral graded challenge while 27 patients underwent an oral graded challenge only. Twenty patients were de-labeled as a result of patient interview. One patient failed oral challenge with minor itching that did not require any treatment, while 27 patients passed. Forty-seven allergies were removed or modified. Two patients who were de-labeled were relabeled with no record of a new reaction. Of de-labeled patients, 50% received a penicillin following removal of the allergy. CONCLUSION: Penicillin allergies can be evaluated and removed using a pharmacy-driven algorithm that prioritizes direct challenges when appropriate. Risks of a reaction are low, and removal leads to change in treatment in a significant portion of patients. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7776714/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.221 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Ham, YoungYoon
Joshi, Shyam
Sukerman, Ellie
Tucker, Kendall J
Yu, Diana
Lewis, James
177. Implementation of Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin Allergy Evaluation and Testing with a Focus on Bypassing Penicillin Skin Testing at an Academic Medical Center
title 177. Implementation of Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin Allergy Evaluation and Testing with a Focus on Bypassing Penicillin Skin Testing at an Academic Medical Center
title_full 177. Implementation of Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin Allergy Evaluation and Testing with a Focus on Bypassing Penicillin Skin Testing at an Academic Medical Center
title_fullStr 177. Implementation of Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin Allergy Evaluation and Testing with a Focus on Bypassing Penicillin Skin Testing at an Academic Medical Center
title_full_unstemmed 177. Implementation of Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin Allergy Evaluation and Testing with a Focus on Bypassing Penicillin Skin Testing at an Academic Medical Center
title_short 177. Implementation of Pharmacist-Driven Penicillin Allergy Evaluation and Testing with a Focus on Bypassing Penicillin Skin Testing at an Academic Medical Center
title_sort 177. implementation of pharmacist-driven penicillin allergy evaluation and testing with a focus on bypassing penicillin skin testing at an academic medical center
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776714/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.221
work_keys_str_mv AT hamyoungyoon 177implementationofpharmacistdrivenpenicillinallergyevaluationandtestingwithafocusonbypassingpenicillinskintestingatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT joshishyam 177implementationofpharmacistdrivenpenicillinallergyevaluationandtestingwithafocusonbypassingpenicillinskintestingatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT sukermanellie 177implementationofpharmacistdrivenpenicillinallergyevaluationandtestingwithafocusonbypassingpenicillinskintestingatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT tuckerkendallj 177implementationofpharmacistdrivenpenicillinallergyevaluationandtestingwithafocusonbypassingpenicillinskintestingatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT yudiana 177implementationofpharmacistdrivenpenicillinallergyevaluationandtestingwithafocusonbypassingpenicillinskintestingatanacademicmedicalcenter
AT lewisjames 177implementationofpharmacistdrivenpenicillinallergyevaluationandtestingwithafocusonbypassingpenicillinskintestingatanacademicmedicalcenter