Cargando…

44. Antibiotic Class-Based Distribution and Analysis of Reported Beta-Lactam Allergies amongst Hospitalized Patients

BACKGROUND: Reported β-lactam allergy (BLA) is very common, yet less than 10% of these patients exhibit true hypersensitivity. When faced with reported BLAs, physicians often choose alternative antibiotics which can be associated with C. difficile infection, drug-resistance development, poorer outco...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hornak, Joseph Patrik, Reynoso, David
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776720/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.089
_version_ 1783630747908702208
author Hornak, Joseph Patrik
Reynoso, David
author_facet Hornak, Joseph Patrik
Reynoso, David
author_sort Hornak, Joseph Patrik
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Reported β-lactam allergy (BLA) is very common, yet less than 10% of these patients exhibit true hypersensitivity. When faced with reported BLAs, physicians often choose alternative antibiotics which can be associated with C. difficile infection, drug-resistance development, poorer outcomes, & increased costs. Effective identification of these patients is necessary for subsequent, appropriate BLA “de-labeling.” Here, we conducted a single-center analysis of alternative antibiotic utilization amongst patients reporting BLA and compare the frequency of drug-resistant infections and C. difficile infection in allergic & non-allergic patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of adult patients hospitalized at The University of Texas Medical Branch from 1/1/2015 to 12/31/2019. Pooled electronic medical records were filtered by antibiotic orders and reported allergies to penicillins or cephalosporins. Patients with drug-resistant and/or C. difficile infection (CDI) were identified by ICD-10 codes. Microsoft Excel & MedCalc were used for statistical calculations. RESULTS: Data were available for 118,326 patients and 9.3% (11,982) reported a BLA, with the highest rates seen in those receiving aztreonam (85.9%, 530/617) & clindamycin (33.7%, 3949/11718). Amongst patients reporting BLA, high ratios-of-consumption (relative to all patients receiving antibiotics) were seen with aztreonam (7.0), clindamycin (2.7), cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitors (2.4), & daptomycin (2.1). Compared to the non-BLA population, BLA patients more frequently experienced MRSA infection (3.0% vs 1.5%, OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.79–2.23, p< 0.0001), β-lactam resistance (1.2% vs 0.6%, OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.72–2.49, p< 0.0001), and CDI (1.2% vs 0.7%, OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.54–2.23, p< 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our measured BLA rate matches approximate expectations near 10%. Moreover, these patients experienced significantly higher frequencies of drug-resistant bacterial infections and CDI. Targeted inpatient penicillin allergy testing stands to be particularly effective in those patients receiving disproportionately utilized alternative agents (e.g. aztreonam, clindamycin, daptomycin). β-lactam allergy “de-labeling” in these patients is likely a valuable antimicrobial stewardship target. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7776720
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77767202021-01-07 44. Antibiotic Class-Based Distribution and Analysis of Reported Beta-Lactam Allergies amongst Hospitalized Patients Hornak, Joseph Patrik Reynoso, David Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Reported β-lactam allergy (BLA) is very common, yet less than 10% of these patients exhibit true hypersensitivity. When faced with reported BLAs, physicians often choose alternative antibiotics which can be associated with C. difficile infection, drug-resistance development, poorer outcomes, & increased costs. Effective identification of these patients is necessary for subsequent, appropriate BLA “de-labeling.” Here, we conducted a single-center analysis of alternative antibiotic utilization amongst patients reporting BLA and compare the frequency of drug-resistant infections and C. difficile infection in allergic & non-allergic patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of adult patients hospitalized at The University of Texas Medical Branch from 1/1/2015 to 12/31/2019. Pooled electronic medical records were filtered by antibiotic orders and reported allergies to penicillins or cephalosporins. Patients with drug-resistant and/or C. difficile infection (CDI) were identified by ICD-10 codes. Microsoft Excel & MedCalc were used for statistical calculations. RESULTS: Data were available for 118,326 patients and 9.3% (11,982) reported a BLA, with the highest rates seen in those receiving aztreonam (85.9%, 530/617) & clindamycin (33.7%, 3949/11718). Amongst patients reporting BLA, high ratios-of-consumption (relative to all patients receiving antibiotics) were seen with aztreonam (7.0), clindamycin (2.7), cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitors (2.4), & daptomycin (2.1). Compared to the non-BLA population, BLA patients more frequently experienced MRSA infection (3.0% vs 1.5%, OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.79–2.23, p< 0.0001), β-lactam resistance (1.2% vs 0.6%, OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.72–2.49, p< 0.0001), and CDI (1.2% vs 0.7%, OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.54–2.23, p< 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our measured BLA rate matches approximate expectations near 10%. Moreover, these patients experienced significantly higher frequencies of drug-resistant bacterial infections and CDI. Targeted inpatient penicillin allergy testing stands to be particularly effective in those patients receiving disproportionately utilized alternative agents (e.g. aztreonam, clindamycin, daptomycin). β-lactam allergy “de-labeling” in these patients is likely a valuable antimicrobial stewardship target. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7776720/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.089 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Hornak, Joseph Patrik
Reynoso, David
44. Antibiotic Class-Based Distribution and Analysis of Reported Beta-Lactam Allergies amongst Hospitalized Patients
title 44. Antibiotic Class-Based Distribution and Analysis of Reported Beta-Lactam Allergies amongst Hospitalized Patients
title_full 44. Antibiotic Class-Based Distribution and Analysis of Reported Beta-Lactam Allergies amongst Hospitalized Patients
title_fullStr 44. Antibiotic Class-Based Distribution and Analysis of Reported Beta-Lactam Allergies amongst Hospitalized Patients
title_full_unstemmed 44. Antibiotic Class-Based Distribution and Analysis of Reported Beta-Lactam Allergies amongst Hospitalized Patients
title_short 44. Antibiotic Class-Based Distribution and Analysis of Reported Beta-Lactam Allergies amongst Hospitalized Patients
title_sort 44. antibiotic class-based distribution and analysis of reported beta-lactam allergies amongst hospitalized patients
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776720/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.089
work_keys_str_mv AT hornakjosephpatrik 44antibioticclassbaseddistributionandanalysisofreportedbetalactamallergiesamongsthospitalizedpatients
AT reynosodavid 44antibioticclassbaseddistributionandanalysisofreportedbetalactamallergiesamongsthospitalizedpatients