Cargando…
44. Antibiotic Class-Based Distribution and Analysis of Reported Beta-Lactam Allergies amongst Hospitalized Patients
BACKGROUND: Reported β-lactam allergy (BLA) is very common, yet less than 10% of these patients exhibit true hypersensitivity. When faced with reported BLAs, physicians often choose alternative antibiotics which can be associated with C. difficile infection, drug-resistance development, poorer outco...
Autores principales: | , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776720/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.089 |
_version_ | 1783630747908702208 |
---|---|
author | Hornak, Joseph Patrik Reynoso, David |
author_facet | Hornak, Joseph Patrik Reynoso, David |
author_sort | Hornak, Joseph Patrik |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: Reported β-lactam allergy (BLA) is very common, yet less than 10% of these patients exhibit true hypersensitivity. When faced with reported BLAs, physicians often choose alternative antibiotics which can be associated with C. difficile infection, drug-resistance development, poorer outcomes, & increased costs. Effective identification of these patients is necessary for subsequent, appropriate BLA “de-labeling.” Here, we conducted a single-center analysis of alternative antibiotic utilization amongst patients reporting BLA and compare the frequency of drug-resistant infections and C. difficile infection in allergic & non-allergic patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of adult patients hospitalized at The University of Texas Medical Branch from 1/1/2015 to 12/31/2019. Pooled electronic medical records were filtered by antibiotic orders and reported allergies to penicillins or cephalosporins. Patients with drug-resistant and/or C. difficile infection (CDI) were identified by ICD-10 codes. Microsoft Excel & MedCalc were used for statistical calculations. RESULTS: Data were available for 118,326 patients and 9.3% (11,982) reported a BLA, with the highest rates seen in those receiving aztreonam (85.9%, 530/617) & clindamycin (33.7%, 3949/11718). Amongst patients reporting BLA, high ratios-of-consumption (relative to all patients receiving antibiotics) were seen with aztreonam (7.0), clindamycin (2.7), cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitors (2.4), & daptomycin (2.1). Compared to the non-BLA population, BLA patients more frequently experienced MRSA infection (3.0% vs 1.5%, OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.79–2.23, p< 0.0001), β-lactam resistance (1.2% vs 0.6%, OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.72–2.49, p< 0.0001), and CDI (1.2% vs 0.7%, OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.54–2.23, p< 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our measured BLA rate matches approximate expectations near 10%. Moreover, these patients experienced significantly higher frequencies of drug-resistant bacterial infections and CDI. Targeted inpatient penicillin allergy testing stands to be particularly effective in those patients receiving disproportionately utilized alternative agents (e.g. aztreonam, clindamycin, daptomycin). β-lactam allergy “de-labeling” in these patients is likely a valuable antimicrobial stewardship target. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7776720 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77767202021-01-07 44. Antibiotic Class-Based Distribution and Analysis of Reported Beta-Lactam Allergies amongst Hospitalized Patients Hornak, Joseph Patrik Reynoso, David Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Reported β-lactam allergy (BLA) is very common, yet less than 10% of these patients exhibit true hypersensitivity. When faced with reported BLAs, physicians often choose alternative antibiotics which can be associated with C. difficile infection, drug-resistance development, poorer outcomes, & increased costs. Effective identification of these patients is necessary for subsequent, appropriate BLA “de-labeling.” Here, we conducted a single-center analysis of alternative antibiotic utilization amongst patients reporting BLA and compare the frequency of drug-resistant infections and C. difficile infection in allergic & non-allergic patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective review of adult patients hospitalized at The University of Texas Medical Branch from 1/1/2015 to 12/31/2019. Pooled electronic medical records were filtered by antibiotic orders and reported allergies to penicillins or cephalosporins. Patients with drug-resistant and/or C. difficile infection (CDI) were identified by ICD-10 codes. Microsoft Excel & MedCalc were used for statistical calculations. RESULTS: Data were available for 118,326 patients and 9.3% (11,982) reported a BLA, with the highest rates seen in those receiving aztreonam (85.9%, 530/617) & clindamycin (33.7%, 3949/11718). Amongst patients reporting BLA, high ratios-of-consumption (relative to all patients receiving antibiotics) were seen with aztreonam (7.0), clindamycin (2.7), cephalosporin/β-lactamase inhibitors (2.4), & daptomycin (2.1). Compared to the non-BLA population, BLA patients more frequently experienced MRSA infection (3.0% vs 1.5%, OR 1.99, 95% CI 1.79–2.23, p< 0.0001), β-lactam resistance (1.2% vs 0.6%, OR 2.07, 95% CI 1.72–2.49, p< 0.0001), and CDI (1.2% vs 0.7%, OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.54–2.23, p< 0.0001). CONCLUSION: Our measured BLA rate matches approximate expectations near 10%. Moreover, these patients experienced significantly higher frequencies of drug-resistant bacterial infections and CDI. Targeted inpatient penicillin allergy testing stands to be particularly effective in those patients receiving disproportionately utilized alternative agents (e.g. aztreonam, clindamycin, daptomycin). β-lactam allergy “de-labeling” in these patients is likely a valuable antimicrobial stewardship target. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7776720/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.089 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Poster Abstracts Hornak, Joseph Patrik Reynoso, David 44. Antibiotic Class-Based Distribution and Analysis of Reported Beta-Lactam Allergies amongst Hospitalized Patients |
title | 44. Antibiotic Class-Based Distribution and Analysis of Reported Beta-Lactam Allergies amongst Hospitalized Patients |
title_full | 44. Antibiotic Class-Based Distribution and Analysis of Reported Beta-Lactam Allergies amongst Hospitalized Patients |
title_fullStr | 44. Antibiotic Class-Based Distribution and Analysis of Reported Beta-Lactam Allergies amongst Hospitalized Patients |
title_full_unstemmed | 44. Antibiotic Class-Based Distribution and Analysis of Reported Beta-Lactam Allergies amongst Hospitalized Patients |
title_short | 44. Antibiotic Class-Based Distribution and Analysis of Reported Beta-Lactam Allergies amongst Hospitalized Patients |
title_sort | 44. antibiotic class-based distribution and analysis of reported beta-lactam allergies amongst hospitalized patients |
topic | Poster Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776720/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.089 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT hornakjosephpatrik 44antibioticclassbaseddistributionandanalysisofreportedbetalactamallergiesamongsthospitalizedpatients AT reynosodavid 44antibioticclassbaseddistributionandanalysisofreportedbetalactamallergiesamongsthospitalizedpatients |