Cargando…

114. Implementation of an Empiric Organism Specific Guidelines for Gram-negative Bacteremia in conjunction with Rapid Diagnostic Testing

BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to confirm the validity of institution specific treatment recommendations targeting organisms identified by GenMark Dx® ePlex® blood cultures identification (BCID) Gram-negative panel prior to susceptibility results. METHODS: We developed and implemented i...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Bernice, Fidelia, Avdic, Edina, Dzintars, Kathryn, Cruz, Aliyah
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776769/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.159
_version_ 1783630759589838848
author Bernice, Fidelia
Avdic, Edina
Dzintars, Kathryn
Cruz, Aliyah
author_facet Bernice, Fidelia
Avdic, Edina
Dzintars, Kathryn
Cruz, Aliyah
author_sort Bernice, Fidelia
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to confirm the validity of institution specific treatment recommendations targeting organisms identified by GenMark Dx® ePlex® blood cultures identification (BCID) Gram-negative panel prior to susceptibility results. METHODS: We developed and implemented institution specific guidelines for empiric antibiotic therapy for Gram-negative organisms targeted by GenMark Dx® ePlex® BCID. We utilized blood culture antibiograms, existing evidence for the most optimal agent for each pathogen, probable resistance mechanisms and patient clinical status to create these guidelines. From December 16, 2019 through May 31, 2020, infectious diseases pharmacists reviewed all positive blood cultures; assessed compliance with guidelines and intervened as needed. The primary objective was to determine how frequently guideline recommend agents would be ineffective against targeted pathogens based on susceptibilities. Secondary objectives were compliance with guidelines and frequency of therapy escalation or de-escalation. RESULTS: GenMark® testing was completed on 222 cultures positive for Gram-negative rods with target organisms identification in 195 (88%) blood cultures. Two hundred and five organisms were identified; most commonly E. coli (40%) and K. pneumoniae (21%).Resistance markers were detected in 30 aerobic blood cultures; 28 CTX-M, and 2 KPC. Our institutional guideline provided appropriate empiric coverage in 93% of bacteremia episodes. The most common reason for ineffective therapy was the presence of resistance mechanisms not detected by GenMark® test (e.g. non-CTX-M extended spectrum beta-lactamases). The compliance rate with the guidelines was 55%; the most common reason for non-compliance was the use of an anti-pseudmonal beta-lactams in neutropenic patients.. The system failed to identify panel organisms in only 5 (2%) of blood cultures. CONCLUSION: The institution-specific guidelines providing empiric coverage for each organism identified by rapid diagnostic tests can aid antimicrobial stewardship efforts to de-escalate therapy while still providing effective coverage in >90% of cases. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures.
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7776769
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77767692021-01-07 114. Implementation of an Empiric Organism Specific Guidelines for Gram-negative Bacteremia in conjunction with Rapid Diagnostic Testing Bernice, Fidelia Avdic, Edina Dzintars, Kathryn Cruz, Aliyah Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: The objective of this study was to confirm the validity of institution specific treatment recommendations targeting organisms identified by GenMark Dx® ePlex® blood cultures identification (BCID) Gram-negative panel prior to susceptibility results. METHODS: We developed and implemented institution specific guidelines for empiric antibiotic therapy for Gram-negative organisms targeted by GenMark Dx® ePlex® BCID. We utilized blood culture antibiograms, existing evidence for the most optimal agent for each pathogen, probable resistance mechanisms and patient clinical status to create these guidelines. From December 16, 2019 through May 31, 2020, infectious diseases pharmacists reviewed all positive blood cultures; assessed compliance with guidelines and intervened as needed. The primary objective was to determine how frequently guideline recommend agents would be ineffective against targeted pathogens based on susceptibilities. Secondary objectives were compliance with guidelines and frequency of therapy escalation or de-escalation. RESULTS: GenMark® testing was completed on 222 cultures positive for Gram-negative rods with target organisms identification in 195 (88%) blood cultures. Two hundred and five organisms were identified; most commonly E. coli (40%) and K. pneumoniae (21%).Resistance markers were detected in 30 aerobic blood cultures; 28 CTX-M, and 2 KPC. Our institutional guideline provided appropriate empiric coverage in 93% of bacteremia episodes. The most common reason for ineffective therapy was the presence of resistance mechanisms not detected by GenMark® test (e.g. non-CTX-M extended spectrum beta-lactamases). The compliance rate with the guidelines was 55%; the most common reason for non-compliance was the use of an anti-pseudmonal beta-lactams in neutropenic patients.. The system failed to identify panel organisms in only 5 (2%) of blood cultures. CONCLUSION: The institution-specific guidelines providing empiric coverage for each organism identified by rapid diagnostic tests can aid antimicrobial stewardship efforts to de-escalate therapy while still providing effective coverage in >90% of cases. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures. Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7776769/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.159 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Bernice, Fidelia
Avdic, Edina
Dzintars, Kathryn
Cruz, Aliyah
114. Implementation of an Empiric Organism Specific Guidelines for Gram-negative Bacteremia in conjunction with Rapid Diagnostic Testing
title 114. Implementation of an Empiric Organism Specific Guidelines for Gram-negative Bacteremia in conjunction with Rapid Diagnostic Testing
title_full 114. Implementation of an Empiric Organism Specific Guidelines for Gram-negative Bacteremia in conjunction with Rapid Diagnostic Testing
title_fullStr 114. Implementation of an Empiric Organism Specific Guidelines for Gram-negative Bacteremia in conjunction with Rapid Diagnostic Testing
title_full_unstemmed 114. Implementation of an Empiric Organism Specific Guidelines for Gram-negative Bacteremia in conjunction with Rapid Diagnostic Testing
title_short 114. Implementation of an Empiric Organism Specific Guidelines for Gram-negative Bacteremia in conjunction with Rapid Diagnostic Testing
title_sort 114. implementation of an empiric organism specific guidelines for gram-negative bacteremia in conjunction with rapid diagnostic testing
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776769/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.159
work_keys_str_mv AT bernicefidelia 114implementationofanempiricorganismspecificguidelinesforgramnegativebacteremiainconjunctionwithrapiddiagnostictesting
AT avdicedina 114implementationofanempiricorganismspecificguidelinesforgramnegativebacteremiainconjunctionwithrapiddiagnostictesting
AT dzintarskathryn 114implementationofanempiricorganismspecificguidelinesforgramnegativebacteremiainconjunctionwithrapiddiagnostictesting
AT cruzaliyah 114implementationofanempiricorganismspecificguidelinesforgramnegativebacteremiainconjunctionwithrapiddiagnostictesting