Cargando…

118. Eliminating Blood Culture Contamination with an Initial-specimen Diversion Device

BACKGROUND: Blood samples obtained via traditional venipuncture can become contaminated by superficial and deeply embedded skin flora. We evaluated the hospital-wide use of an initial-specimen diversion device (ISDD) designed to shunt these microorganisms away from the culture bottle to reduce blood...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Tompkins, Lucy S, Madison, Alexandra, Schaffner, Tammy, Tran, Jenny, Ang, Pablito
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776884/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.428
_version_ 1783630784608862208
author Tompkins, Lucy S
Madison, Alexandra
Schaffner, Tammy
Tran, Jenny
Ang, Pablito
author_facet Tompkins, Lucy S
Madison, Alexandra
Schaffner, Tammy
Tran, Jenny
Ang, Pablito
author_sort Tompkins, Lucy S
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Blood samples obtained via traditional venipuncture can become contaminated by superficial and deeply embedded skin flora. We evaluated the hospital-wide use of an initial-specimen diversion device (ISDD) designed to shunt these microorganisms away from the culture bottle to reduce blood culture contamination (BCC) and sequelae: false-positive central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), repeat blood culture draws, inappropriate antibiotic usage, increased patient length-of-stay and misdiagnosis. The study aimed to show the proportion of blood cultures containing contaminants drawn by phlebotomy staff using the ISDD versus those drawn using traditional methods. Nursing staff continued to use traditional methods to draw blood cultures in the emergency department (ED) and from inpatients. METHODS: Over a four-month trial at Stanford Health Care (SHC), 4,462 blood cultures were drawn by phlebotomy staff using the ISDD (Steripath Gen2, Magnolia Medical Technologies) in the ED and from inpatients; 922 blood cultures were obtained by phlebotomy staff using standard methods. Additionally, 1,413 blood cultures were drawn by nursing staff using standard methods. The number of matched sets (2 bottles [aerobic/anaerobic] plus 2 bottles [aerobic/anaerobic], with total volume 40 ml) obtained through traditional methods and by the ISDD were recorded. Contaminants were defined by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). In addition, sets in which 1 out of 4 bottles contained vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) or Candida sp. were also recorded, even though these are not considered contaminants by the NHSN. RESULTS: Of 4,462 blood cultures obtained using the ISDD there were zero contaminants found (BCC rate 0%) versus 29 contaminated sets using traditional methods (BCC rate 3.15%). Twenty-eight contaminants were observed from nursing staff blood culture draws (BCC rate 1.98%). Zero false-positive CLABSIs were associated with use of the ISDD for the trial period. No matched sets containing 1 of 4 bottles with VRE or Candida sp. were observed. Table Stanford Health Care blood culture collection methods and contamination events (March 15, 2019 - July 21, 2019) [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: The trial results encourage adoption of the ISDD as standard practice for blood culture at SHC. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7776884
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77768842021-01-07 118. Eliminating Blood Culture Contamination with an Initial-specimen Diversion Device Tompkins, Lucy S Madison, Alexandra Schaffner, Tammy Tran, Jenny Ang, Pablito Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Blood samples obtained via traditional venipuncture can become contaminated by superficial and deeply embedded skin flora. We evaluated the hospital-wide use of an initial-specimen diversion device (ISDD) designed to shunt these microorganisms away from the culture bottle to reduce blood culture contamination (BCC) and sequelae: false-positive central line-associated bloodstream infections (CLABSIs), repeat blood culture draws, inappropriate antibiotic usage, increased patient length-of-stay and misdiagnosis. The study aimed to show the proportion of blood cultures containing contaminants drawn by phlebotomy staff using the ISDD versus those drawn using traditional methods. Nursing staff continued to use traditional methods to draw blood cultures in the emergency department (ED) and from inpatients. METHODS: Over a four-month trial at Stanford Health Care (SHC), 4,462 blood cultures were drawn by phlebotomy staff using the ISDD (Steripath Gen2, Magnolia Medical Technologies) in the ED and from inpatients; 922 blood cultures were obtained by phlebotomy staff using standard methods. Additionally, 1,413 blood cultures were drawn by nursing staff using standard methods. The number of matched sets (2 bottles [aerobic/anaerobic] plus 2 bottles [aerobic/anaerobic], with total volume 40 ml) obtained through traditional methods and by the ISDD were recorded. Contaminants were defined by the National Healthcare Safety Network (NHSN). In addition, sets in which 1 out of 4 bottles contained vancomycin-resistant Enterococcus (VRE) or Candida sp. were also recorded, even though these are not considered contaminants by the NHSN. RESULTS: Of 4,462 blood cultures obtained using the ISDD there were zero contaminants found (BCC rate 0%) versus 29 contaminated sets using traditional methods (BCC rate 3.15%). Twenty-eight contaminants were observed from nursing staff blood culture draws (BCC rate 1.98%). Zero false-positive CLABSIs were associated with use of the ISDD for the trial period. No matched sets containing 1 of 4 bottles with VRE or Candida sp. were observed. Table Stanford Health Care blood culture collection methods and contamination events (March 15, 2019 - July 21, 2019) [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: The trial results encourage adoption of the ISDD as standard practice for blood culture at SHC. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7776884/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.428 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Tompkins, Lucy S
Madison, Alexandra
Schaffner, Tammy
Tran, Jenny
Ang, Pablito
118. Eliminating Blood Culture Contamination with an Initial-specimen Diversion Device
title 118. Eliminating Blood Culture Contamination with an Initial-specimen Diversion Device
title_full 118. Eliminating Blood Culture Contamination with an Initial-specimen Diversion Device
title_fullStr 118. Eliminating Blood Culture Contamination with an Initial-specimen Diversion Device
title_full_unstemmed 118. Eliminating Blood Culture Contamination with an Initial-specimen Diversion Device
title_short 118. Eliminating Blood Culture Contamination with an Initial-specimen Diversion Device
title_sort 118. eliminating blood culture contamination with an initial-specimen diversion device
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776884/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.428
work_keys_str_mv AT tompkinslucys 118eliminatingbloodculturecontaminationwithaninitialspecimendiversiondevice
AT madisonalexandra 118eliminatingbloodculturecontaminationwithaninitialspecimendiversiondevice
AT schaffnertammy 118eliminatingbloodculturecontaminationwithaninitialspecimendiversiondevice
AT tranjenny 118eliminatingbloodculturecontaminationwithaninitialspecimendiversiondevice
AT angpablito 118eliminatingbloodculturecontaminationwithaninitialspecimendiversiondevice