Cargando…

91. Implementing Criteria to Reduce Blood Cultures Ordering: A Pre- and Post-Intervention Retrospective Study in a Critical Access Hospital

BACKGROUND: Blood culture utilization has been performed widely. Typically, clinicians order blood cultures in patients whom bacteremia is suspected. Our previous study showed that 35% of blood cultures performed in May 2019 could have been prevented since they did not meet the certain criteria. Thi...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Mahatanan, Rattanaporn, Gomez, Gina, Olsen, Bridget, Henderson, Racheal
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776885/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.136
_version_ 1783630784843743232
author Mahatanan, Rattanaporn
Gomez, Gina
Olsen, Bridget
Henderson, Racheal
author_facet Mahatanan, Rattanaporn
Gomez, Gina
Olsen, Bridget
Henderson, Racheal
author_sort Mahatanan, Rattanaporn
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Blood culture utilization has been performed widely. Typically, clinicians order blood cultures in patients whom bacteremia is suspected. Our previous study showed that 35% of blood cultures performed in May 2019 could have been prevented since they did not meet the certain criteria. This study sought to examine the outcomes after education intervention by implementing criteria of blood culture ordering whether it could reduce unnecessary blood cultures. METHODS: Electronic medical records of adult patients who had blood cultures done during pre-and post-study period were reviewed. Demographic data, clinical presentation, vital signs, location, quantities and sites of blood cultures were obtained. The measurement of qSOFA, SIRS and severe sepsis criteria were collected on the presentation. There were some clinical prediction rules for blood stream infection described in the previous studies. For this study, we use the criteria of at least 2 SIRS and/or at least one of the qSOFA criteria or severe sepsis to be a minimum indication for ordering blood cultures. The follow-up study was done after 6 weeks of educational intervention with implementation of criteria. Chi-square was used to compare the differences between two groups. RESULTS: There were a total of 165 patients included in our study (112 in pre- and 53 in post-intervention group). There were a total of 18 patients with positive blood cultures (12/112;10.71% in pre-intervention gr. vs 6/53;11.32% in post-intervention gr., p=0.91). Six out of 18 (33%) were deemed to be contaminated (3/12;25% vs 3/6;50%, p=0.29). Gram positive cocci were the most common organisms of the true positive blood cultures (10/12;83%). Of 165 patients, 78 (47%) had at least one of qSOFA (47/112;41% vs 31/53;58%, p=0.05), 18 (11%) had met severe sepsis criteria (9/112;8% vs 9/53;17%, p=0.09). There were 47 (28%) patients who had less than 2 criteria of SIRS and did not meet either criteria of qSOFA or severe sepsis (39/112; 35% vs 8/53; 15%, chi 6.87, p< 0.01). There was no true bacteremia in this group of patients. CONCLUSION: Our study found that implementation of criteria for blood cultures successfully reduces the unnecessary blood cultures orders approximately 20% without missing true bacteremia in suspected patients. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7776885
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77768852021-01-07 91. Implementing Criteria to Reduce Blood Cultures Ordering: A Pre- and Post-Intervention Retrospective Study in a Critical Access Hospital Mahatanan, Rattanaporn Gomez, Gina Olsen, Bridget Henderson, Racheal Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Blood culture utilization has been performed widely. Typically, clinicians order blood cultures in patients whom bacteremia is suspected. Our previous study showed that 35% of blood cultures performed in May 2019 could have been prevented since they did not meet the certain criteria. This study sought to examine the outcomes after education intervention by implementing criteria of blood culture ordering whether it could reduce unnecessary blood cultures. METHODS: Electronic medical records of adult patients who had blood cultures done during pre-and post-study period were reviewed. Demographic data, clinical presentation, vital signs, location, quantities and sites of blood cultures were obtained. The measurement of qSOFA, SIRS and severe sepsis criteria were collected on the presentation. There were some clinical prediction rules for blood stream infection described in the previous studies. For this study, we use the criteria of at least 2 SIRS and/or at least one of the qSOFA criteria or severe sepsis to be a minimum indication for ordering blood cultures. The follow-up study was done after 6 weeks of educational intervention with implementation of criteria. Chi-square was used to compare the differences between two groups. RESULTS: There were a total of 165 patients included in our study (112 in pre- and 53 in post-intervention group). There were a total of 18 patients with positive blood cultures (12/112;10.71% in pre-intervention gr. vs 6/53;11.32% in post-intervention gr., p=0.91). Six out of 18 (33%) were deemed to be contaminated (3/12;25% vs 3/6;50%, p=0.29). Gram positive cocci were the most common organisms of the true positive blood cultures (10/12;83%). Of 165 patients, 78 (47%) had at least one of qSOFA (47/112;41% vs 31/53;58%, p=0.05), 18 (11%) had met severe sepsis criteria (9/112;8% vs 9/53;17%, p=0.09). There were 47 (28%) patients who had less than 2 criteria of SIRS and did not meet either criteria of qSOFA or severe sepsis (39/112; 35% vs 8/53; 15%, chi 6.87, p< 0.01). There was no true bacteremia in this group of patients. CONCLUSION: Our study found that implementation of criteria for blood cultures successfully reduces the unnecessary blood cultures orders approximately 20% without missing true bacteremia in suspected patients. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7776885/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.136 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Mahatanan, Rattanaporn
Gomez, Gina
Olsen, Bridget
Henderson, Racheal
91. Implementing Criteria to Reduce Blood Cultures Ordering: A Pre- and Post-Intervention Retrospective Study in a Critical Access Hospital
title 91. Implementing Criteria to Reduce Blood Cultures Ordering: A Pre- and Post-Intervention Retrospective Study in a Critical Access Hospital
title_full 91. Implementing Criteria to Reduce Blood Cultures Ordering: A Pre- and Post-Intervention Retrospective Study in a Critical Access Hospital
title_fullStr 91. Implementing Criteria to Reduce Blood Cultures Ordering: A Pre- and Post-Intervention Retrospective Study in a Critical Access Hospital
title_full_unstemmed 91. Implementing Criteria to Reduce Blood Cultures Ordering: A Pre- and Post-Intervention Retrospective Study in a Critical Access Hospital
title_short 91. Implementing Criteria to Reduce Blood Cultures Ordering: A Pre- and Post-Intervention Retrospective Study in a Critical Access Hospital
title_sort 91. implementing criteria to reduce blood cultures ordering: a pre- and post-intervention retrospective study in a critical access hospital
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7776885/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.136
work_keys_str_mv AT mahatananrattanaporn 91implementingcriteriatoreducebloodculturesorderingapreandpostinterventionretrospectivestudyinacriticalaccesshospital
AT gomezgina 91implementingcriteriatoreducebloodculturesorderingapreandpostinterventionretrospectivestudyinacriticalaccesshospital
AT olsenbridget 91implementingcriteriatoreducebloodculturesorderingapreandpostinterventionretrospectivestudyinacriticalaccesshospital
AT hendersonracheal 91implementingcriteriatoreducebloodculturesorderingapreandpostinterventionretrospectivestudyinacriticalaccesshospital