Cargando…
1309. Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam (I/R) Alone and in Combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) in the In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model
BACKGROUND: I/R, a carbapenem-beta-lactamase inhibitor antibiotic, is active against most imipenem-resistant PSA, including MDR isolates. Combination therapy may enhance activity against MDR pathogens and suppress resistance. This study’s objective was to assess the efficacy of I/R compared with com...
Autores principales: | , , |
---|---|
Formato: | Online Artículo Texto |
Lenguaje: | English |
Publicado: |
Oxford University Press
2020
|
Materias: | |
Acceso en línea: | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777014/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1491 |
_version_ | 1783630808677875712 |
---|---|
author | Chen, Iris H Nicolau, David P Kuti, Joseph L |
author_facet | Chen, Iris H Nicolau, David P Kuti, Joseph L |
author_sort | Chen, Iris H |
collection | PubMed |
description | BACKGROUND: I/R, a carbapenem-beta-lactamase inhibitor antibiotic, is active against most imipenem-resistant PSA, including MDR isolates. Combination therapy may enhance activity against MDR pathogens and suppress resistance. This study’s objective was to assess the efficacy of I/R compared with combinations including colistin (CST) or amikacin (AMK) against PSA in an IVPD model. METHODS: Human-simulated concentrations of I/R 500/250 mg every six hours, a total daily dose of CST 360 mg, and AMK 25 mg/kg daily were reproduced alone and in combination against 6 imipenem-non-susceptible PSA with I/R MICs of 1/4 to 8/4 mg/L in an IVPD over 24h. The primary endpoint was the difference in 24h colony forming units (CFU) between each combination regimen and its components alone. The log ratio differences of the area under the CFU curve were also calculated to compare the overall bacterial burden resulting from exposure to I/R alone with those treated by combination regimens. Emergence of resistance was tested at 24h using drug-containing plates at 3xMIC. RESULTS: I/R, CST, and AMK alone produced 24hCFU changes consistent with isolate MICs. One isolate (already I/R non-susceptible) developed I/R resistance, and 4 and 3 developed CST and AMK resistance, respectively. I/R plus CST suppressed all resistance and resulted in synergistic or additive interactions against three of six isolates with 24h CFU reductions ranging from -2.62 to -4.67 log(10)CFU/mL. This combination further reduced overall bacterial burden by 79-81% compared with I/R alone against two I/R-non-susceptible strains. I/R plus AMK also prevented resistance emergence but exhibited indifferent interactions against all isolates at 24h with the combined drugs achieving -0.51 to -3.33 log(10)CFU/mL reductions. Minor overall reductions in bacterial burden were observed relative to I/R alone. CONCLUSION: I/R plus CST resulted in additivity or synergy against three of six PSA and prevented I/R and CST resistance, whereas the addition of AMK only suppressed resistance. The greatest overall reductions in bacterial burden, however, were observed with I/R plus CST against I/R-non-susceptible isolates, supporting targeted use of this combination against this phenotype when alternatives are unavailable. DISCLOSURES: David P. Nicolau, PharmD, Cepheid (Other Financial or Material Support, Consultant, speaker bureau member or has received research support.)Merck & Co., Inc. (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Wockhardt (Grant/Research Support) Joseph L. Kuti, PharmD, Allergan (Speaker’s Bureau)bioMérieux (Research Grant or Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Speaker Honorarium)Melinta (Research Grant or Support)Merck & Co., Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Paratek (Speaker’s Bureau)Summit (Other Financial or Material Support, Research funding (clinical trials)) |
format | Online Article Text |
id | pubmed-7777014 |
institution | National Center for Biotechnology Information |
language | English |
publishDate | 2020 |
publisher | Oxford University Press |
record_format | MEDLINE/PubMed |
spelling | pubmed-77770142021-01-07 1309. Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam (I/R) Alone and in Combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) in the In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model Chen, Iris H Nicolau, David P Kuti, Joseph L Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: I/R, a carbapenem-beta-lactamase inhibitor antibiotic, is active against most imipenem-resistant PSA, including MDR isolates. Combination therapy may enhance activity against MDR pathogens and suppress resistance. This study’s objective was to assess the efficacy of I/R compared with combinations including colistin (CST) or amikacin (AMK) against PSA in an IVPD model. METHODS: Human-simulated concentrations of I/R 500/250 mg every six hours, a total daily dose of CST 360 mg, and AMK 25 mg/kg daily were reproduced alone and in combination against 6 imipenem-non-susceptible PSA with I/R MICs of 1/4 to 8/4 mg/L in an IVPD over 24h. The primary endpoint was the difference in 24h colony forming units (CFU) between each combination regimen and its components alone. The log ratio differences of the area under the CFU curve were also calculated to compare the overall bacterial burden resulting from exposure to I/R alone with those treated by combination regimens. Emergence of resistance was tested at 24h using drug-containing plates at 3xMIC. RESULTS: I/R, CST, and AMK alone produced 24hCFU changes consistent with isolate MICs. One isolate (already I/R non-susceptible) developed I/R resistance, and 4 and 3 developed CST and AMK resistance, respectively. I/R plus CST suppressed all resistance and resulted in synergistic or additive interactions against three of six isolates with 24h CFU reductions ranging from -2.62 to -4.67 log(10)CFU/mL. This combination further reduced overall bacterial burden by 79-81% compared with I/R alone against two I/R-non-susceptible strains. I/R plus AMK also prevented resistance emergence but exhibited indifferent interactions against all isolates at 24h with the combined drugs achieving -0.51 to -3.33 log(10)CFU/mL reductions. Minor overall reductions in bacterial burden were observed relative to I/R alone. CONCLUSION: I/R plus CST resulted in additivity or synergy against three of six PSA and prevented I/R and CST resistance, whereas the addition of AMK only suppressed resistance. The greatest overall reductions in bacterial burden, however, were observed with I/R plus CST against I/R-non-susceptible isolates, supporting targeted use of this combination against this phenotype when alternatives are unavailable. DISCLOSURES: David P. Nicolau, PharmD, Cepheid (Other Financial or Material Support, Consultant, speaker bureau member or has received research support.)Merck & Co., Inc. (Consultant, Grant/Research Support, Speaker’s Bureau)Wockhardt (Grant/Research Support) Joseph L. Kuti, PharmD, Allergan (Speaker’s Bureau)bioMérieux (Research Grant or Support, Other Financial or Material Support, Speaker Honorarium)Melinta (Research Grant or Support)Merck & Co., Inc. (Research Grant or Support)Paratek (Speaker’s Bureau)Summit (Other Financial or Material Support, Research funding (clinical trials)) Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7777014/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1491 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com |
spellingShingle | Poster Abstracts Chen, Iris H Nicolau, David P Kuti, Joseph L 1309. Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam (I/R) Alone and in Combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) in the In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model |
title | 1309. Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam (I/R) Alone and in Combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) in the In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model |
title_full | 1309. Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam (I/R) Alone and in Combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) in the In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model |
title_fullStr | 1309. Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam (I/R) Alone and in Combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) in the In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model |
title_full_unstemmed | 1309. Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam (I/R) Alone and in Combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) in the In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model |
title_short | 1309. Imipenem/Cilastatin/Relebactam (I/R) Alone and in Combination against Pseudomonas aeruginosa (PSA) in the In Vitro Pharmacodynamic Model |
title_sort | 1309. imipenem/cilastatin/relebactam (i/r) alone and in combination against pseudomonas aeruginosa (psa) in the in vitro pharmacodynamic model |
topic | Poster Abstracts |
url | https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777014/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1491 |
work_keys_str_mv | AT chenirish 1309imipenemcilastatinrelebactamiraloneandincombinationagainstpseudomonasaeruginosapsaintheinvitropharmacodynamicmodel AT nicolaudavidp 1309imipenemcilastatinrelebactamiraloneandincombinationagainstpseudomonasaeruginosapsaintheinvitropharmacodynamicmodel AT kutijosephl 1309imipenemcilastatinrelebactamiraloneandincombinationagainstpseudomonasaeruginosapsaintheinvitropharmacodynamicmodel |