Cargando…

59. Evaluation of Drug-Bug Mismatch Alerts and Their Value in an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship is a priority for hospitals and utilizing generated reports can enhance stewardship activities. At our institution, a software program was used to help optimize antimicrobial therapy by providing a drug-bug mismatch (DBM) alert which identifies patients with cul...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Whittaker, Cristen A, Nhan, Ethan, Storb, Marc, Szymborski, Shana, Trivedi, Manish, Reilly, Joseph
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777166/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.104
_version_ 1783630839947460608
author Whittaker, Cristen A
Nhan, Ethan
Storb, Marc
Szymborski, Shana
Trivedi, Manish
Reilly, Joseph
author_facet Whittaker, Cristen A
Nhan, Ethan
Storb, Marc
Szymborski, Shana
Trivedi, Manish
Reilly, Joseph
author_sort Whittaker, Cristen A
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship is a priority for hospitals and utilizing generated reports can enhance stewardship activities. At our institution, a software program was used to help optimize antimicrobial therapy by providing a drug-bug mismatch (DBM) alert which identifies patients with culture susceptibilities not covered by their current antimicrobial therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of this alert feature and determine whether or not an intervention was needed for patients identified. METHODS: From August 2019 to March 2020 the DBM alerts were reviewed by a pharmacist and interventions pursued when appropriate. Data collection included the patient’s culture results and source, indication for current antibiotics, and potential for intervention. Alerts were stratified into different groups based on the type of culture, including urine, blood, sputum, bone or bodily fluid, wound or tissues, and stool. Those mismatches not resulting in an intervention were categorized as a contamination, colonization, or inappropriate. This study was approved by the institutional review board. RESULTS: A total of 105 DBM alerts were analyzed from various sources, including 51 (47.6%) urine, 17 (16.2%) sputum, 16 (15.2%) wound or tissue, 14 (13.3%) blood, 6 (5.7%) bone or bodily fluid, and 1 stool culture. Overall, 48 of 105 (45.7%) of alerts resulted in an intervention. Urine and sputum culture alerts required interventions at the lowest rate with treatment interventions in 12 of 51 (23.5%) and 5 of 17 (29.4%) of those cases respectively. Blood culture alerts were the most successful as 9 of 14 (64.3%) alerts required an intervention. Alerts with wound or tissue cultures identified gaps in therapy as 9 of 16 (56.3%) cases required intervention. Colonization or contamination appeared to be the major cause of alerts that did not result in intervention. CONCLUSION: The DBM alert can be a beneficial tool for pharmacists participating in antimicrobial stewardship activities. However, the alerts had varying value depending on the culture source. The DBM alert can identify real-time patient issues regarding appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Further modifications to our process in utilizing this DBM report are warranted to enhance value and allocate time accordingly. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7777166
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77771662021-01-07 59. Evaluation of Drug-Bug Mismatch Alerts and Their Value in an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program Whittaker, Cristen A Nhan, Ethan Storb, Marc Szymborski, Shana Trivedi, Manish Reilly, Joseph Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial stewardship is a priority for hospitals and utilizing generated reports can enhance stewardship activities. At our institution, a software program was used to help optimize antimicrobial therapy by providing a drug-bug mismatch (DBM) alert which identifies patients with culture susceptibilities not covered by their current antimicrobial therapy. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the utility of this alert feature and determine whether or not an intervention was needed for patients identified. METHODS: From August 2019 to March 2020 the DBM alerts were reviewed by a pharmacist and interventions pursued when appropriate. Data collection included the patient’s culture results and source, indication for current antibiotics, and potential for intervention. Alerts were stratified into different groups based on the type of culture, including urine, blood, sputum, bone or bodily fluid, wound or tissues, and stool. Those mismatches not resulting in an intervention were categorized as a contamination, colonization, or inappropriate. This study was approved by the institutional review board. RESULTS: A total of 105 DBM alerts were analyzed from various sources, including 51 (47.6%) urine, 17 (16.2%) sputum, 16 (15.2%) wound or tissue, 14 (13.3%) blood, 6 (5.7%) bone or bodily fluid, and 1 stool culture. Overall, 48 of 105 (45.7%) of alerts resulted in an intervention. Urine and sputum culture alerts required interventions at the lowest rate with treatment interventions in 12 of 51 (23.5%) and 5 of 17 (29.4%) of those cases respectively. Blood culture alerts were the most successful as 9 of 14 (64.3%) alerts required an intervention. Alerts with wound or tissue cultures identified gaps in therapy as 9 of 16 (56.3%) cases required intervention. Colonization or contamination appeared to be the major cause of alerts that did not result in intervention. CONCLUSION: The DBM alert can be a beneficial tool for pharmacists participating in antimicrobial stewardship activities. However, the alerts had varying value depending on the culture source. The DBM alert can identify real-time patient issues regarding appropriate antimicrobial therapy. Further modifications to our process in utilizing this DBM report are warranted to enhance value and allocate time accordingly. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7777166/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.104 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Whittaker, Cristen A
Nhan, Ethan
Storb, Marc
Szymborski, Shana
Trivedi, Manish
Reilly, Joseph
59. Evaluation of Drug-Bug Mismatch Alerts and Their Value in an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program
title 59. Evaluation of Drug-Bug Mismatch Alerts and Their Value in an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program
title_full 59. Evaluation of Drug-Bug Mismatch Alerts and Their Value in an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program
title_fullStr 59. Evaluation of Drug-Bug Mismatch Alerts and Their Value in an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program
title_full_unstemmed 59. Evaluation of Drug-Bug Mismatch Alerts and Their Value in an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program
title_short 59. Evaluation of Drug-Bug Mismatch Alerts and Their Value in an Antimicrobial Stewardship Program
title_sort 59. evaluation of drug-bug mismatch alerts and their value in an antimicrobial stewardship program
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777166/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.104
work_keys_str_mv AT whittakercristena 59evaluationofdrugbugmismatchalertsandtheirvalueinanantimicrobialstewardshipprogram
AT nhanethan 59evaluationofdrugbugmismatchalertsandtheirvalueinanantimicrobialstewardshipprogram
AT storbmarc 59evaluationofdrugbugmismatchalertsandtheirvalueinanantimicrobialstewardshipprogram
AT szymborskishana 59evaluationofdrugbugmismatchalertsandtheirvalueinanantimicrobialstewardshipprogram
AT trivedimanish 59evaluationofdrugbugmismatchalertsandtheirvalueinanantimicrobialstewardshipprogram
AT reillyjoseph 59evaluationofdrugbugmismatchalertsandtheirvalueinanantimicrobialstewardshipprogram