Cargando…

56. Ertapenem Utilization: “CRE”ating Solutions for Improving Hospital Stay and Stewardship

BACKGROUND: Ertapenem, a carbapenem offers advantages over other carbapenems. It is administered daily and can therefore facilitate home infusion discharges, it has a narrower spectrum of activity which could reduce resistance, and is more cost effective than meropenem. Our objectives were to determ...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Willner, Debra M, Bengualid, Victoria, Bisono-Garcia, Bismarck, Berger, Judith
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777173/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.101
_version_ 1783630841747865600
author Willner, Debra M
Bengualid, Victoria
Bisono-Garcia, Bismarck
Berger, Judith
author_facet Willner, Debra M
Bengualid, Victoria
Bisono-Garcia, Bismarck
Berger, Judith
author_sort Willner, Debra M
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Ertapenem, a carbapenem offers advantages over other carbapenems. It is administered daily and can therefore facilitate home infusion discharges, it has a narrower spectrum of activity which could reduce resistance, and is more cost effective than meropenem. Our objectives were to determine whether ertapenem utilization decreased hospital length of stay and whether use had an impact on future meropenem resistance. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of ertapenem over 2 years for the following infections: urinary tract, skin and soft tissue (SSTI), and osteomyelitis. Evaluated pathogens, duration of inpatient therapy, discharged antimicrobials, length of discharged therapy, and positive cultures up to 90 days post treatment. Analyzed length of stay, and calculated the hospital days that were saved by discharging patients on ertapenem. RESULTS: 70 patients were analyzed, with indications and pathogens listed in Figure 1. Patients were initially placed on empiric therapies pending culture results. On average, patients received 2.9 days of empiric meropenem. Once cultures finalized, patients were switched to ertapenem. On average, patients received 6 days of inpatient ertapenem prior to discharge. 37 patients were discharged with ertapenem, totaling 937 days of discharged therapy. Of the 36 patients readmitted within 90 days, 20 had pathogens identified, of which 4 were meropenem-resistant (Figure 2). Infections, Pathogens, and Treatment Duration [Image: see text] [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: In this pilot stewardship initiative, switching to and discharging patients on ertapenem saved 937 hospital days over the 2 years evaluated, with the greatest days of therapy saved in osteomyelitis and SSTIs. There were a total of 422 days of inpatient ertapenem, mostly in the SSTI and cystitis indications. Of the 20 pathogens identified on readmission, 4 (20%) were meropenem-resistant. All were Acinetobacter baumanii-often carbapenem-resistant; none of the cultures were the same pathogen as the originally identified, but this warrants further investigation. The indication associated with least days of therapy saved and the highest days of inpatient ertapenem was cystitis. 53% of the patients were discharged with ertapenem; future direction involved identifying barriers for speedy discharge across all indications. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7777173
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77771732021-01-07 56. Ertapenem Utilization: “CRE”ating Solutions for Improving Hospital Stay and Stewardship Willner, Debra M Bengualid, Victoria Bisono-Garcia, Bismarck Berger, Judith Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Ertapenem, a carbapenem offers advantages over other carbapenems. It is administered daily and can therefore facilitate home infusion discharges, it has a narrower spectrum of activity which could reduce resistance, and is more cost effective than meropenem. Our objectives were to determine whether ertapenem utilization decreased hospital length of stay and whether use had an impact on future meropenem resistance. METHODS: This was a retrospective chart review of ertapenem over 2 years for the following infections: urinary tract, skin and soft tissue (SSTI), and osteomyelitis. Evaluated pathogens, duration of inpatient therapy, discharged antimicrobials, length of discharged therapy, and positive cultures up to 90 days post treatment. Analyzed length of stay, and calculated the hospital days that were saved by discharging patients on ertapenem. RESULTS: 70 patients were analyzed, with indications and pathogens listed in Figure 1. Patients were initially placed on empiric therapies pending culture results. On average, patients received 2.9 days of empiric meropenem. Once cultures finalized, patients were switched to ertapenem. On average, patients received 6 days of inpatient ertapenem prior to discharge. 37 patients were discharged with ertapenem, totaling 937 days of discharged therapy. Of the 36 patients readmitted within 90 days, 20 had pathogens identified, of which 4 were meropenem-resistant (Figure 2). Infections, Pathogens, and Treatment Duration [Image: see text] [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: In this pilot stewardship initiative, switching to and discharging patients on ertapenem saved 937 hospital days over the 2 years evaluated, with the greatest days of therapy saved in osteomyelitis and SSTIs. There were a total of 422 days of inpatient ertapenem, mostly in the SSTI and cystitis indications. Of the 20 pathogens identified on readmission, 4 (20%) were meropenem-resistant. All were Acinetobacter baumanii-often carbapenem-resistant; none of the cultures were the same pathogen as the originally identified, but this warrants further investigation. The indication associated with least days of therapy saved and the highest days of inpatient ertapenem was cystitis. 53% of the patients were discharged with ertapenem; future direction involved identifying barriers for speedy discharge across all indications. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7777173/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.101 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Willner, Debra M
Bengualid, Victoria
Bisono-Garcia, Bismarck
Berger, Judith
56. Ertapenem Utilization: “CRE”ating Solutions for Improving Hospital Stay and Stewardship
title 56. Ertapenem Utilization: “CRE”ating Solutions for Improving Hospital Stay and Stewardship
title_full 56. Ertapenem Utilization: “CRE”ating Solutions for Improving Hospital Stay and Stewardship
title_fullStr 56. Ertapenem Utilization: “CRE”ating Solutions for Improving Hospital Stay and Stewardship
title_full_unstemmed 56. Ertapenem Utilization: “CRE”ating Solutions for Improving Hospital Stay and Stewardship
title_short 56. Ertapenem Utilization: “CRE”ating Solutions for Improving Hospital Stay and Stewardship
title_sort 56. ertapenem utilization: “cre”ating solutions for improving hospital stay and stewardship
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777173/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.101
work_keys_str_mv AT willnerdebram 56ertapenemutilizationcreatingsolutionsforimprovinghospitalstayandstewardship
AT bengualidvictoria 56ertapenemutilizationcreatingsolutionsforimprovinghospitalstayandstewardship
AT bisonogarciabismarck 56ertapenemutilizationcreatingsolutionsforimprovinghospitalstayandstewardship
AT bergerjudith 56ertapenemutilizationcreatingsolutionsforimprovinghospitalstayandstewardship