Cargando…

597. Comparison of Vancomycin and Daptomycin Complications and Interventions in Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy

BACKGROUND: Vancomycin and daptomycin are commonly used in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) for patients requiring lengthy courses of intravenous antimicrobials who are otherwise stable for discharge. Balancing the convenience and cost-savings of OPAT with the potential for adverse...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Nakrani, Monark, Yu, Diana, Sikka, Monica, Lewis, James, Douglass, Alyse, Mayer, Heather, Young, Kathleen, Streifel, Amber C
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777184/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.791
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: Vancomycin and daptomycin are commonly used in outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy (OPAT) for patients requiring lengthy courses of intravenous antimicrobials who are otherwise stable for discharge. Balancing the convenience and cost-savings of OPAT with the potential for adverse effects is challenging, this study compared the rates of complications and antimicrobial interventions for patients receiving vancomycin versus daptomycin across multiple OPAT settings. METHODS: We performed a retrospective chart review of adult OPAT patients who received >72 hours of vancomycin or daptomycin via home infusion, infusion center, or skilled nursing facility between January 2017 and August 2019. The outcomes evaluated included the rates of adverse drug reactions (ADRs), laboratory results above a defined threshold (vancomycin levels >20 mg/mL in the vancomycin arm and creatinine phosphokinase (CPK) levels >500 units/L in the daptomycin group), line complications, emergency department (ED) visits, and hospital readmissions. Other outcomes included additional phone calls and interventions required to coordinate care (additional labs, assessment of symptoms, additional test or antimicrobial-related dose changes) by the OPAT team. RESULTS: 180 patients were included; 130 received vancomycin and 50 received daptomycin. (Table 1) Patients in the vancomycin group had more supratherapeutic vancomycin troughs than elevated CPK for patients in the daptomycin group (rate ratio [RR] 0.16, 95% CI 0.05-0.50, p=0.0018). Rates of interventions (RR 0.37, 95% CI 0.26-0.52, p< 0.0001) and additional phone calls (RR 0.56, 95% CI 0.43-0.72, p< 0.0001) were also higher for patients in the vancomycin group. There were no statistically significant differences between groups in the rates of ADRs, line complications, ED visits, or hospital readmissions. (Table 2) Table 1. Baseline Characteristics [Image: see text] Table 2. Outcomes [Image: see text] CONCLUSION: Vancomycin-treated patients had significantly more laboratory abnormalities and required significantly more time in patient care coordination by the OPAT team. The difference in healthcare utilization between these groups suggests a potential for significant cost-savings for OPAT patients and the healthcare system. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures