Cargando…

691. Results of Repeat HIV-1 DNA Resistance Tests Are Highly Concordant

BACKGROUND: DHHS guidelines recommend caution when interpreting HIV-1 DNA resistance testing because not all previously identified drug resistance mutations (DRMs) may be captured. Comparison of multiple reports from the same patient was performed to assess the ability of HIV-1 DNA testing to consis...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Curanovic, Dusica, Cai, Suqin, Toma, Jonathan, Petropoulos, Christos J, Walworth, Charles M
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777238/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.883
_version_ 1783630856088190976
author Curanovic, Dusica
Cai, Suqin
Toma, Jonathan
Petropoulos, Christos J
Walworth, Charles M
author_facet Curanovic, Dusica
Cai, Suqin
Toma, Jonathan
Petropoulos, Christos J
Walworth, Charles M
author_sort Curanovic, Dusica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: DHHS guidelines recommend caution when interpreting HIV-1 DNA resistance testing because not all previously identified drug resistance mutations (DRMs) may be captured. Comparison of multiple reports from the same patient was performed to assess the ability of HIV-1 DNA testing to consistently identify wild-type and drug resistance alleles. METHODS: Patients with 3 HIV-1 DNA resistance tests (trios) and corresponding HIV-1 viral load (VL) measurements within ~3 months of each resistance test were identified in a commercial database. Concordance among trio test results was assessed for each patient. VL and trio timespan were evaluated for impact on concordance using one-way ANOVA with post-hoc analyses. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with test trios were identified for analysis. Average patient age was 53 years, and 88% were male. All 3 tests within 26/55 trios were associated with VL< 200 copies/mL. The average testing timespan was 100 weeks (range 17-228 weeks). Wild-type virus was identified on 3/3 reports for 11/55 (20%) patients. Among resistant viruses, DRMs were identified on average 70%, 20% and 10% on 3/3, 2/3 and 1/3 of HIV-1 DNA reports, respectively. M184V was identified on 3/3, 2/3 and 1/3 reports among 14/17, 2/17, and 1/17 test trios, respectively. K103N was identified on 3/3 and 2/3 reports among 11/12 and 1/12 test trios, respectively. The redetection rate following an initial HIV-1 DNA test was high for M184V (30/34, 88%) and K103N (23/24, 96%). Of 178 DRMs detected across all initial HIV-1 DNA tests, 17 (9.6%) were not detected on the second, but redetected on the third test, including M184V and K103N in one trio each. The average concordance among test trios across all drug classes was 97%. No correlation between VL at time of testing and DRM redetection rates was observed. Significantly fewer DRMs were recaptured when repeat testing was performed > 24 months after the initial test. CONCLUSION: Repeat HIV-1 DNA drug resistance testing reliably detected archived DRMs. DRM decay related to turnover of the viral reservoir may explain some discordance between repeat HIV-1 DNA tests. DISCLOSURES: Dusica Curanovic, PhD, Monogram Biosciences (Employee) Suqin Cai, n/a, Monogram Biosciences (Employee) Jonathan Toma, n/a, Monogram Biosciences (Employee) Christos J. Petropoulos, PhD, Monogram Biosciences (Employee) Charles M. Walworth, MD, Monogram Biosciences (Employee)
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7777238
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77772382021-01-07 691. Results of Repeat HIV-1 DNA Resistance Tests Are Highly Concordant Curanovic, Dusica Cai, Suqin Toma, Jonathan Petropoulos, Christos J Walworth, Charles M Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: DHHS guidelines recommend caution when interpreting HIV-1 DNA resistance testing because not all previously identified drug resistance mutations (DRMs) may be captured. Comparison of multiple reports from the same patient was performed to assess the ability of HIV-1 DNA testing to consistently identify wild-type and drug resistance alleles. METHODS: Patients with 3 HIV-1 DNA resistance tests (trios) and corresponding HIV-1 viral load (VL) measurements within ~3 months of each resistance test were identified in a commercial database. Concordance among trio test results was assessed for each patient. VL and trio timespan were evaluated for impact on concordance using one-way ANOVA with post-hoc analyses. RESULTS: Fifty-five patients with test trios were identified for analysis. Average patient age was 53 years, and 88% were male. All 3 tests within 26/55 trios were associated with VL< 200 copies/mL. The average testing timespan was 100 weeks (range 17-228 weeks). Wild-type virus was identified on 3/3 reports for 11/55 (20%) patients. Among resistant viruses, DRMs were identified on average 70%, 20% and 10% on 3/3, 2/3 and 1/3 of HIV-1 DNA reports, respectively. M184V was identified on 3/3, 2/3 and 1/3 reports among 14/17, 2/17, and 1/17 test trios, respectively. K103N was identified on 3/3 and 2/3 reports among 11/12 and 1/12 test trios, respectively. The redetection rate following an initial HIV-1 DNA test was high for M184V (30/34, 88%) and K103N (23/24, 96%). Of 178 DRMs detected across all initial HIV-1 DNA tests, 17 (9.6%) were not detected on the second, but redetected on the third test, including M184V and K103N in one trio each. The average concordance among test trios across all drug classes was 97%. No correlation between VL at time of testing and DRM redetection rates was observed. Significantly fewer DRMs were recaptured when repeat testing was performed > 24 months after the initial test. CONCLUSION: Repeat HIV-1 DNA drug resistance testing reliably detected archived DRMs. DRM decay related to turnover of the viral reservoir may explain some discordance between repeat HIV-1 DNA tests. DISCLOSURES: Dusica Curanovic, PhD, Monogram Biosciences (Employee) Suqin Cai, n/a, Monogram Biosciences (Employee) Jonathan Toma, n/a, Monogram Biosciences (Employee) Christos J. Petropoulos, PhD, Monogram Biosciences (Employee) Charles M. Walworth, MD, Monogram Biosciences (Employee) Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7777238/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.883 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Curanovic, Dusica
Cai, Suqin
Toma, Jonathan
Petropoulos, Christos J
Walworth, Charles M
691. Results of Repeat HIV-1 DNA Resistance Tests Are Highly Concordant
title 691. Results of Repeat HIV-1 DNA Resistance Tests Are Highly Concordant
title_full 691. Results of Repeat HIV-1 DNA Resistance Tests Are Highly Concordant
title_fullStr 691. Results of Repeat HIV-1 DNA Resistance Tests Are Highly Concordant
title_full_unstemmed 691. Results of Repeat HIV-1 DNA Resistance Tests Are Highly Concordant
title_short 691. Results of Repeat HIV-1 DNA Resistance Tests Are Highly Concordant
title_sort 691. results of repeat hiv-1 dna resistance tests are highly concordant
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777238/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.883
work_keys_str_mv AT curanovicdusica 691resultsofrepeathiv1dnaresistancetestsarehighlyconcordant
AT caisuqin 691resultsofrepeathiv1dnaresistancetestsarehighlyconcordant
AT tomajonathan 691resultsofrepeathiv1dnaresistancetestsarehighlyconcordant
AT petropouloschristosj 691resultsofrepeathiv1dnaresistancetestsarehighlyconcordant
AT walworthcharlesm 691resultsofrepeathiv1dnaresistancetestsarehighlyconcordant