Cargando…

987. Improving Patient Access to HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis with Pharmacist Involvement

BACKGROUND: Appropriate use of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) after isolated sexual, injection drug use, or other exposures to HIV is an effective tool to reduce the risk of HIV acquisition. PEP completion rates are low, with literature reporting only 40% of sexual assaulted persons adhering to a f...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autor principal: Grossman, Katlyn H
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777320/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1173
_version_ 1783630875054833664
author Grossman, Katlyn H
author_facet Grossman, Katlyn H
author_sort Grossman, Katlyn H
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Appropriate use of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) after isolated sexual, injection drug use, or other exposures to HIV is an effective tool to reduce the risk of HIV acquisition. PEP completion rates are low, with literature reporting only 40% of sexual assaulted persons adhering to a full 28-day course. One important barrier to adherence can be access to medications in a timely manner. In the United States, a four week course of PEP costs nearly $4,000 without insurance and can remain unaffordable with high copays and deductibles for patients who are underinsured. METHODS: A pharmacist in the Infectious Disease (ID) clinic was notified of all non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) cases referred from the Emergency Department for follow up and coordinated benefits investigation, ensured low or no cost medication access, completed medication reconciliation, counseled on PEP adherence, and coordinated filling of same day prescriptions at the hospital based pharmacy. To assess the impact of pharmacist involvement, a retrospective review of nPEP cases over a 6 month period were compared to a 6 month period prior to pharmacist presence in clinic. RESULTS: 16 nPEP cases were seen by a pharmacist compared to 8 nPEP cases seen in the ID clinic without pharmacist involvement. 100% of patients received medications prior to leaving the medical center, compared to 63% of cases filling at the hospital pharmacy prior to pharmacist presence. 25% of patients required an insurance related override in order to access PEP urgently. The average out of pocket cost was $2.25 with maximum total cost being $7.30. Prior to pharmacist involvement, the average out of pocket cost was $475 for complete PEP regimen with a maximum total cost of $3,733.40. 42% of patients completed their entire PEP course and came to follow up appointment after pharmacist involvement, compared to 31% of patients prior to pharmacist presence. CONCLUSION: Pharmacist involvement led to a substantial cost savings to patients receiving nPEP. It was also associated with higher capture rates of prescriptions filled at the hospital pharmacy along with a higher rate of PEP completion and follow up. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7777320
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77773202021-01-07 987. Improving Patient Access to HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis with Pharmacist Involvement Grossman, Katlyn H Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Appropriate use of post-exposure prophylaxis (PEP) after isolated sexual, injection drug use, or other exposures to HIV is an effective tool to reduce the risk of HIV acquisition. PEP completion rates are low, with literature reporting only 40% of sexual assaulted persons adhering to a full 28-day course. One important barrier to adherence can be access to medications in a timely manner. In the United States, a four week course of PEP costs nearly $4,000 without insurance and can remain unaffordable with high copays and deductibles for patients who are underinsured. METHODS: A pharmacist in the Infectious Disease (ID) clinic was notified of all non-occupational post-exposure prophylaxis (nPEP) cases referred from the Emergency Department for follow up and coordinated benefits investigation, ensured low or no cost medication access, completed medication reconciliation, counseled on PEP adherence, and coordinated filling of same day prescriptions at the hospital based pharmacy. To assess the impact of pharmacist involvement, a retrospective review of nPEP cases over a 6 month period were compared to a 6 month period prior to pharmacist presence in clinic. RESULTS: 16 nPEP cases were seen by a pharmacist compared to 8 nPEP cases seen in the ID clinic without pharmacist involvement. 100% of patients received medications prior to leaving the medical center, compared to 63% of cases filling at the hospital pharmacy prior to pharmacist presence. 25% of patients required an insurance related override in order to access PEP urgently. The average out of pocket cost was $2.25 with maximum total cost being $7.30. Prior to pharmacist involvement, the average out of pocket cost was $475 for complete PEP regimen with a maximum total cost of $3,733.40. 42% of patients completed their entire PEP course and came to follow up appointment after pharmacist involvement, compared to 31% of patients prior to pharmacist presence. CONCLUSION: Pharmacist involvement led to a substantial cost savings to patients receiving nPEP. It was also associated with higher capture rates of prescriptions filled at the hospital pharmacy along with a higher rate of PEP completion and follow up. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7777320/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1173 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Grossman, Katlyn H
987. Improving Patient Access to HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis with Pharmacist Involvement
title 987. Improving Patient Access to HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis with Pharmacist Involvement
title_full 987. Improving Patient Access to HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis with Pharmacist Involvement
title_fullStr 987. Improving Patient Access to HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis with Pharmacist Involvement
title_full_unstemmed 987. Improving Patient Access to HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis with Pharmacist Involvement
title_short 987. Improving Patient Access to HIV Post-Exposure Prophylaxis with Pharmacist Involvement
title_sort 987. improving patient access to hiv post-exposure prophylaxis with pharmacist involvement
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777320/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1173
work_keys_str_mv AT grossmankatlynh 987improvingpatientaccesstohivpostexposureprophylaxiswithpharmacistinvolvement