Cargando…

609. Implementation and Post-implementation Analysis of a Pilot Program for Inpatient Review of Outpatient Parenteral Antimicrobial Therapy Prior to Discharge

BACKGROUND: The Infectious Diseases Society of America OPAT (outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy) guidelines state that effective OPAT programs require a multidisciplinary team(1). Currently within the health system, there is no formal OPAT program in place, and OPAT prescribing is not limit...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Hart, Delaney, McCoy, Hailey, Gens, Krista, Wankum, Michael, Tarleton, Andrew
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777335/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.803
Descripción
Sumario:BACKGROUND: The Infectious Diseases Society of America OPAT (outpatient parenteral antimicrobial therapy) guidelines state that effective OPAT programs require a multidisciplinary team(1). Currently within the health system, there is no formal OPAT program in place, and OPAT prescribing is not limited to any specialty. This project aimed to pilot a pharmacist-driven program across five hospitals. METHODS: Adult patients with OPAT ordered between February 1 and May 1, 2020 were included. Patients were excluded if the OPAT was prescribed by infectious diseases (ID) providers or if patients were on OPAT prior to hospital admission. An alert was generated in the electronic health record (EHR) when an order for an intravenous catheter was placed for patients with concomitant antimicrobials. Follow up was performed and documented via a progress note in the EHR as appropriate. Data was collected via retrospective chart review and statistical analysis was performed using Chi-squared test with Yates’ correction. RESULTS: 101 pre- and 7 patients post-implementation were included in this study. There were a total of 51 patients pre-implementation that received inappropriate OPAT care per the IDSA OPAT guidelines, and post-implementation 2 patients (50.5% vs 28.6%, p=0.47). The secondary outcomes of 30-day readmission rates were 17% and 0% (p=0.52); and complications related to OPAT (e.g. central-line associated blood stream infections) were 12% and 0% (p=0.73), respectively. 2 midline catheters were recommended by the OPAT team, and a cost savings of up to $6,796 was calculated. CONCLUSION: This pilot showed a trend towards decreased inappropriate OPAT prescribing and cost avoidance of an ID pharmacist-driven review of OPAT prior to patient hospital discharge. Limitations to this pilot included being underpowered due to the limited time-frame of the post-implementation period, and an inability for follow up with patients discharged utilizing an alternative home infusion service. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures