Cargando…

962. Linkage to Care Outcomes among Known HIV-Positive Patients at a High Prevalence Urban Hospital Emergency Department

BACKGROUND: Retention in care of persons with HIV (PWH) is essential for achieving viral suppression and decreasing community transmission. CDC estimates that the 23% of known PWH not retained in care account for 43% of all new transmissions. This study seeks to describe the impact of an opt-out ED...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Sudyn, Alexander W, Paer, Jeffrey M, Kodali, Swetha, Maldonado, Samuel, Nyaku, Amesika, Swaminathan, Shobha
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777343/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1148
_version_ 1783630880555663360
author Sudyn, Alexander W
Paer, Jeffrey M
Kodali, Swetha
Maldonado, Samuel
Nyaku, Amesika
Swaminathan, Shobha
author_facet Sudyn, Alexander W
Paer, Jeffrey M
Kodali, Swetha
Maldonado, Samuel
Nyaku, Amesika
Swaminathan, Shobha
author_sort Sudyn, Alexander W
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: Retention in care of persons with HIV (PWH) is essential for achieving viral suppression and decreasing community transmission. CDC estimates that the 23% of known PWH not retained in care account for 43% of all new transmissions. This study seeks to describe the impact of an opt-out ED screening with navigator-assisted linkage to care (LTC) protocol for out of care PWH. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective chart review was conducted among PWH (prior positive) inadvertently retested in the ED between 2015 and 2018. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with LTC with patient navigator (PN) support. Factors with p ≤ 0.1 were included in the multivariate analysis as were age and sex at birth. Patients who died were excluded from statistical analyses. RESULTS: Among 464 patients who tested positive, 338 (73%) were known positive with 120 (35%) of those out of care at the time of screening. Mean age for this group was 47 (SD 11.9); 57% male, 81% non-Hispanic black, 10% Hispanic, and 6% non-Hispanic white. Fifty-five (46%) patients were successfully LTC, 54 (45%) referred to the state for linkage, and 11 (9%) died. A total of 109 patients were included in the analysis. Univariate analysis was performed for age (F(1, 107) = 0.98, p = 0.324) and female sex at birth (OR = 1.42 [95% CI 0.66, 3.05], p = 0.373) as well as Hispanic race (OR = 3.33 [95% CI 0.84, 13.04], p = 0.085), heterosexual HIV risk (OR = 2.76 [95% CI 1.27, 5.99], p = 0.011), IDU (OR = 0.49 [95% CI 0.21, 1.11], p = 0.088), and other SUD (OR = 0.42 [95% CI 0.19, 0.94], p = 0.035). Only heterosexual HIV risk (OR = 3.01 [95% CI 1.23, 7.32], p = 0.015) maintained significance in the final multivariate model. CONCLUSION: Opt-out ED screening revealed >30% of known positive PWH were out of care at the time of testing; of whom nearly 50% were LTC with PN support. It is possible that persons reporting heterosexual HIV risk may feel less stigmatized and therefore are more likely to LTC. Similarly, the association with SUD, albeit non-significant, may reflect underrepresentation of individuals with SUD in remission among patient navigators. Future opt-out ED screening protocols should build upon diverse care teams to further engage patients with SUD and those at risk for non-heterosexual HIV transmission. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7777343
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77773432021-01-07 962. Linkage to Care Outcomes among Known HIV-Positive Patients at a High Prevalence Urban Hospital Emergency Department Sudyn, Alexander W Paer, Jeffrey M Kodali, Swetha Maldonado, Samuel Nyaku, Amesika Swaminathan, Shobha Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: Retention in care of persons with HIV (PWH) is essential for achieving viral suppression and decreasing community transmission. CDC estimates that the 23% of known PWH not retained in care account for 43% of all new transmissions. This study seeks to describe the impact of an opt-out ED screening with navigator-assisted linkage to care (LTC) protocol for out of care PWH. METHODS: An IRB-approved retrospective chart review was conducted among PWH (prior positive) inadvertently retested in the ED between 2015 and 2018. Univariate and multivariate logistic regression was used to identify factors associated with LTC with patient navigator (PN) support. Factors with p ≤ 0.1 were included in the multivariate analysis as were age and sex at birth. Patients who died were excluded from statistical analyses. RESULTS: Among 464 patients who tested positive, 338 (73%) were known positive with 120 (35%) of those out of care at the time of screening. Mean age for this group was 47 (SD 11.9); 57% male, 81% non-Hispanic black, 10% Hispanic, and 6% non-Hispanic white. Fifty-five (46%) patients were successfully LTC, 54 (45%) referred to the state for linkage, and 11 (9%) died. A total of 109 patients were included in the analysis. Univariate analysis was performed for age (F(1, 107) = 0.98, p = 0.324) and female sex at birth (OR = 1.42 [95% CI 0.66, 3.05], p = 0.373) as well as Hispanic race (OR = 3.33 [95% CI 0.84, 13.04], p = 0.085), heterosexual HIV risk (OR = 2.76 [95% CI 1.27, 5.99], p = 0.011), IDU (OR = 0.49 [95% CI 0.21, 1.11], p = 0.088), and other SUD (OR = 0.42 [95% CI 0.19, 0.94], p = 0.035). Only heterosexual HIV risk (OR = 3.01 [95% CI 1.23, 7.32], p = 0.015) maintained significance in the final multivariate model. CONCLUSION: Opt-out ED screening revealed >30% of known positive PWH were out of care at the time of testing; of whom nearly 50% were LTC with PN support. It is possible that persons reporting heterosexual HIV risk may feel less stigmatized and therefore are more likely to LTC. Similarly, the association with SUD, albeit non-significant, may reflect underrepresentation of individuals with SUD in remission among patient navigators. Future opt-out ED screening protocols should build upon diverse care teams to further engage patients with SUD and those at risk for non-heterosexual HIV transmission. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7777343/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1148 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Sudyn, Alexander W
Paer, Jeffrey M
Kodali, Swetha
Maldonado, Samuel
Nyaku, Amesika
Swaminathan, Shobha
962. Linkage to Care Outcomes among Known HIV-Positive Patients at a High Prevalence Urban Hospital Emergency Department
title 962. Linkage to Care Outcomes among Known HIV-Positive Patients at a High Prevalence Urban Hospital Emergency Department
title_full 962. Linkage to Care Outcomes among Known HIV-Positive Patients at a High Prevalence Urban Hospital Emergency Department
title_fullStr 962. Linkage to Care Outcomes among Known HIV-Positive Patients at a High Prevalence Urban Hospital Emergency Department
title_full_unstemmed 962. Linkage to Care Outcomes among Known HIV-Positive Patients at a High Prevalence Urban Hospital Emergency Department
title_short 962. Linkage to Care Outcomes among Known HIV-Positive Patients at a High Prevalence Urban Hospital Emergency Department
title_sort 962. linkage to care outcomes among known hiv-positive patients at a high prevalence urban hospital emergency department
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777343/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1148
work_keys_str_mv AT sudynalexanderw 962linkagetocareoutcomesamongknownhivpositivepatientsatahighprevalenceurbanhospitalemergencydepartment
AT paerjeffreym 962linkagetocareoutcomesamongknownhivpositivepatientsatahighprevalenceurbanhospitalemergencydepartment
AT kodaliswetha 962linkagetocareoutcomesamongknownhivpositivepatientsatahighprevalenceurbanhospitalemergencydepartment
AT maldonadosamuel 962linkagetocareoutcomesamongknownhivpositivepatientsatahighprevalenceurbanhospitalemergencydepartment
AT nyakuamesika 962linkagetocareoutcomesamongknownhivpositivepatientsatahighprevalenceurbanhospitalemergencydepartment
AT swaminathanshobha 962linkagetocareoutcomesamongknownhivpositivepatientsatahighprevalenceurbanhospitalemergencydepartment