Cargando…

101. Diagnostic Utility of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel and Impact on Antibiotic Use

BACKGROUND: The detection and identification of meningitis and encephalitis pathogens from CSF via traditional microbiologic methods may take several hours to days. The BioFire FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel (BioFire), approved by the FDA in 2015, can detect 14 different pathogens within on...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Vanood, Aimen, Hospodar, Alexandra, Carpenter, Christopher F
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777361/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.146
_version_ 1783630884706975744
author Vanood, Aimen
Hospodar, Alexandra
Carpenter, Christopher F
author_facet Vanood, Aimen
Hospodar, Alexandra
Carpenter, Christopher F
author_sort Vanood, Aimen
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The detection and identification of meningitis and encephalitis pathogens from CSF via traditional microbiologic methods may take several hours to days. The BioFire FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel (BioFire), approved by the FDA in 2015, can detect 14 different pathogens within one hour, providing a faster time to diagnosis of a broad range of pathogens. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of BioFire on length of hospital stay and duration of antibiotic use. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed meningitis/encephalitis between 2015 and 2019 at 3 Beaumont Health (BH) hospitals. BioFire was adopted by BH midyear in 2017, allowing for analysis of cohorts over comparable periods before and after the introduction of the panel. Data collected and analyzed included biodemographics, comorbidities, presenting signs and symptoms, CSF analysis results, pathogens, days of antibiotic therapy, length of stay, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients diagnosed with meningitis and/or encephalitis were reviewed, including 59 who underwent testing via BioFire. Of the 161 patients, 68 had a pathogen identified, 50 via traditional methods (6 bacterial and 44 viral) and 18 via BioFire (3 bacterial and 15 viral). West Nile Virus accounted for 17 of the viral infections diagnosed via traditional methods. The mean duration of antibiotic use after the assays resulted was not significantly different between patients with bacterial infections diagnosed by traditional methods or BioFire (11.2 vs 13.0 days, p=0.82) or for those with viral infections (0.1 vs 0 days, p=0.3). The median length of stay was also not significantly different between the two cohorts for patients with bacterial infections (21.7 vs 15.0 days, p = 0.36) or viral infections (6.2 vs. 10.0 days, p = 0.10). CONCLUSION: While utilization of the BioFire panel yielded a faster diagnostic result, we have no evidence to demonstrate that it contributes to a significant reduction in duration of antibiotic use or length of stay. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7777361
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77773612021-01-07 101. Diagnostic Utility of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel and Impact on Antibiotic Use Vanood, Aimen Hospodar, Alexandra Carpenter, Christopher F Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: The detection and identification of meningitis and encephalitis pathogens from CSF via traditional microbiologic methods may take several hours to days. The BioFire FilmArray Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel (BioFire), approved by the FDA in 2015, can detect 14 different pathogens within one hour, providing a faster time to diagnosis of a broad range of pathogens. The purpose of this study was to examine the impact of BioFire on length of hospital stay and duration of antibiotic use. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective chart review of patients diagnosed meningitis/encephalitis between 2015 and 2019 at 3 Beaumont Health (BH) hospitals. BioFire was adopted by BH midyear in 2017, allowing for analysis of cohorts over comparable periods before and after the introduction of the panel. Data collected and analyzed included biodemographics, comorbidities, presenting signs and symptoms, CSF analysis results, pathogens, days of antibiotic therapy, length of stay, and mortality. RESULTS: A total of 161 patients diagnosed with meningitis and/or encephalitis were reviewed, including 59 who underwent testing via BioFire. Of the 161 patients, 68 had a pathogen identified, 50 via traditional methods (6 bacterial and 44 viral) and 18 via BioFire (3 bacterial and 15 viral). West Nile Virus accounted for 17 of the viral infections diagnosed via traditional methods. The mean duration of antibiotic use after the assays resulted was not significantly different between patients with bacterial infections diagnosed by traditional methods or BioFire (11.2 vs 13.0 days, p=0.82) or for those with viral infections (0.1 vs 0 days, p=0.3). The median length of stay was also not significantly different between the two cohorts for patients with bacterial infections (21.7 vs 15.0 days, p = 0.36) or viral infections (6.2 vs. 10.0 days, p = 0.10). CONCLUSION: While utilization of the BioFire panel yielded a faster diagnostic result, we have no evidence to demonstrate that it contributes to a significant reduction in duration of antibiotic use or length of stay. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7777361/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.146 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Vanood, Aimen
Hospodar, Alexandra
Carpenter, Christopher F
101. Diagnostic Utility of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel and Impact on Antibiotic Use
title 101. Diagnostic Utility of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel and Impact on Antibiotic Use
title_full 101. Diagnostic Utility of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel and Impact on Antibiotic Use
title_fullStr 101. Diagnostic Utility of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel and Impact on Antibiotic Use
title_full_unstemmed 101. Diagnostic Utility of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel and Impact on Antibiotic Use
title_short 101. Diagnostic Utility of a Multiplex PCR Meningitis/Encephalitis Panel and Impact on Antibiotic Use
title_sort 101. diagnostic utility of a multiplex pcr meningitis/encephalitis panel and impact on antibiotic use
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777361/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.146
work_keys_str_mv AT vanoodaimen 101diagnosticutilityofamultiplexpcrmeningitisencephalitispanelandimpactonantibioticuse
AT hospodaralexandra 101diagnosticutilityofamultiplexpcrmeningitisencephalitispanelandimpactonantibioticuse
AT carpenterchristopherf 101diagnosticutilityofamultiplexpcrmeningitisencephalitispanelandimpactonantibioticuse