Cargando…

391. Outcomes of Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy in COVID-19 Positive Patients

BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed new challenges for antimicrobial stewardship. Optimal medical treatment is not completely understood at this time. The epidemiology and outcomes of bacterial co-infections are not well-established; however, empiric antibiotic (abx) use is anecdotally co...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Medler, Corey J, Jakupovic, Lejla, Weinmann, Allison J, Kenney, Rachel, Davis, Susan L
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777469/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.586
_version_ 1783630908847292416
author Medler, Corey J
Jakupovic, Lejla
Weinmann, Allison J
Kenney, Rachel
Davis, Susan L
Davis, Susan L
author_facet Medler, Corey J
Jakupovic, Lejla
Weinmann, Allison J
Kenney, Rachel
Davis, Susan L
Davis, Susan L
author_sort Medler, Corey J
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed new challenges for antimicrobial stewardship. Optimal medical treatment is not completely understood at this time. The epidemiology and outcomes of bacterial co-infections are not well-established; however, empiric antibiotic (abx) use is anecdotally common. The purpose of this study is to characterize empiric antimicrobial drug selection and timing in COVID-19 and evaluate the impact on patient outcomes. METHODS: Cross-sectional cohort study for COVID-19 positive inpatients from March 1, 2020 to June 1, 2020 at an academic medical center and 4 community hospitals. Inclusion: patients with a documented positive COVID-19 PCR nasopharyngeal swab. Exclusion: patients less than 18 years; deceased or transitioned to hospice within 24 hours of admission. Primary endpoint: empiric abx drug, initiation, duration and indication. Additional data collected: severity of illness, co-infection diagnosis, microbiology, and adverse drug effects (ADE). Clinical outcomes included time to recovery by COVID-19 ordinal outcome, clinical status at day 15, and readmission. RESULTS: 400 patients were included with 27% from the ICU. COVID symptom category included mild (23.8%), moderate (53%), severe (15%), and critical (8.3%). 322 (80.5%) received abx at any time during hospital stay, 301 (93.5%) started within 1 day of admission. Most common documented indication community-acquired pneumonia (69%). Identified 43 (10.8%) microbiologically confirmed co-infections, including 5 MRSA and 7 Pseudomonas. Median duration of initial abx 4 days. 54/322 (16.8%) had abx restarted after discontinuation. Median days to recovery without abx was 10 days (7 – 14) and 14 days (9 – 20) with abx. Patient characteristics and outcomes described in table 1. 74 abx related ADE were identified: gastrointestinal 37 and renal 22. CONCLUSION: It’s difficult to distinguish bacterial and Covid-19 in coinfections in patients ill enough to be hospitalized. Longer courses of empiric abx therapy were prevalent as the severity of illness increased. However, the low frequency of microbiologically confirmed bacterial co-infections results in potentially unnecessary abx exposure. This exposure increases risk of abx ADE and may not improve clinical outcome. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7777469
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77774692021-01-07 391. Outcomes of Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy in COVID-19 Positive Patients Medler, Corey J Jakupovic, Lejla Weinmann, Allison J Kenney, Rachel Davis, Susan L Davis, Susan L Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: The COVID-19 pandemic has revealed new challenges for antimicrobial stewardship. Optimal medical treatment is not completely understood at this time. The epidemiology and outcomes of bacterial co-infections are not well-established; however, empiric antibiotic (abx) use is anecdotally common. The purpose of this study is to characterize empiric antimicrobial drug selection and timing in COVID-19 and evaluate the impact on patient outcomes. METHODS: Cross-sectional cohort study for COVID-19 positive inpatients from March 1, 2020 to June 1, 2020 at an academic medical center and 4 community hospitals. Inclusion: patients with a documented positive COVID-19 PCR nasopharyngeal swab. Exclusion: patients less than 18 years; deceased or transitioned to hospice within 24 hours of admission. Primary endpoint: empiric abx drug, initiation, duration and indication. Additional data collected: severity of illness, co-infection diagnosis, microbiology, and adverse drug effects (ADE). Clinical outcomes included time to recovery by COVID-19 ordinal outcome, clinical status at day 15, and readmission. RESULTS: 400 patients were included with 27% from the ICU. COVID symptom category included mild (23.8%), moderate (53%), severe (15%), and critical (8.3%). 322 (80.5%) received abx at any time during hospital stay, 301 (93.5%) started within 1 day of admission. Most common documented indication community-acquired pneumonia (69%). Identified 43 (10.8%) microbiologically confirmed co-infections, including 5 MRSA and 7 Pseudomonas. Median duration of initial abx 4 days. 54/322 (16.8%) had abx restarted after discontinuation. Median days to recovery without abx was 10 days (7 – 14) and 14 days (9 – 20) with abx. Patient characteristics and outcomes described in table 1. 74 abx related ADE were identified: gastrointestinal 37 and renal 22. CONCLUSION: It’s difficult to distinguish bacterial and Covid-19 in coinfections in patients ill enough to be hospitalized. Longer courses of empiric abx therapy were prevalent as the severity of illness increased. However, the low frequency of microbiologically confirmed bacterial co-infections results in potentially unnecessary abx exposure. This exposure increases risk of abx ADE and may not improve clinical outcome. [Image: see text] DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7777469/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.586 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Medler, Corey J
Jakupovic, Lejla
Weinmann, Allison J
Kenney, Rachel
Davis, Susan L
Davis, Susan L
391. Outcomes of Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy in COVID-19 Positive Patients
title 391. Outcomes of Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy in COVID-19 Positive Patients
title_full 391. Outcomes of Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy in COVID-19 Positive Patients
title_fullStr 391. Outcomes of Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy in COVID-19 Positive Patients
title_full_unstemmed 391. Outcomes of Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy in COVID-19 Positive Patients
title_short 391. Outcomes of Empiric Antimicrobial Therapy in COVID-19 Positive Patients
title_sort 391. outcomes of empiric antimicrobial therapy in covid-19 positive patients
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777469/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.586
work_keys_str_mv AT medlercoreyj 391outcomesofempiricantimicrobialtherapyincovid19positivepatients
AT jakupoviclejla 391outcomesofempiricantimicrobialtherapyincovid19positivepatients
AT weinmannallisonj 391outcomesofempiricantimicrobialtherapyincovid19positivepatients
AT kenneyrachel 391outcomesofempiricantimicrobialtherapyincovid19positivepatients
AT davissusanl 391outcomesofempiricantimicrobialtherapyincovid19positivepatients
AT davissusanl 391outcomesofempiricantimicrobialtherapyincovid19positivepatients