Cargando…

865. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prevalence among healthcare workers (HCW) in contact tracings in a Dutch teaching hospital, 2010-2018

BACKGROUND: In The Netherlands, the national guidelines on MRSA prevention and control advocate screening of HCW after unprotected exposure to MRSA carriers. Although this strategy at large is successful, contact tracing of staff is a time consuming and costly component. We evaluated our contact tra...

Descripción completa

Detalles Bibliográficos
Autores principales: Weterings, veronica, Kievits, Heidi, van Rijen, Miranda, kluytmans, Jan
Formato: Online Artículo Texto
Lenguaje:English
Publicado: Oxford University Press 2020
Materias:
Acceso en línea:https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777477/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1054
_version_ 1783630910760943616
author Weterings, veronica
Kievits, Heidi
van Rijen, Miranda
kluytmans, Jan
author_facet Weterings, veronica
Kievits, Heidi
van Rijen, Miranda
kluytmans, Jan
author_sort Weterings, veronica
collection PubMed
description BACKGROUND: In The Netherlands, the national guidelines on MRSA prevention and control advocate screening of HCW after unprotected exposure to MRSA carriers. Although this strategy at large is successful, contact tracing of staff is a time consuming and costly component. We evaluated our contact tracing policy for HCW over the years 2010 – 2018. MRSA prevalence among samples in contact tracing [Image: see text] METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was performed in a Dutch teaching hospital. All HCW who had unprotected contact with an MRSA carrier were included in contact tracing. When there had been a long period of unprotected admission prior to an MRSA finding, or when the index case was a HCW, than the entire (nursing) team was tested. All samples of HCWs who were tested for MRSA carriage as part of contact tracing from 2010 until 2018 were included. A pooled nose, throat and perineum swab was collected using the eSwab medium (Copan) and inoculated on chromID MRSA agar plates (bioMérieux) after enrichment in a broth. RESULTS: In total, we included 8,849 samples (range: 677 – 1,448 samples per year) from a total of 287 contact tracings (range: 26 – 55 contact tracings per year). Thirty two HCWs were colonized with MRSA (0.36%; 95%CI 0.26 – 0.51). None of them developed a clinical infection. Eight HCWs (0.10%; 95%CI 0.05% – 0.19%) were colonized with the same MLVA type as the index case, and were detected in 6/287 contact tracings (2%). In 4/8 of these cases, a positive HCW was the index for undertaking contact tracing. In 3/8 cases it was clear that the HCW who was identified in the contact tracing was the source of the outbreak and was the cause of invasive MRSA infections in patients. Notably, a different MLVA type as the index case was found in 24 HCWs (0,27%; 95%CI 0,18 – 0,40) of which 7/24 HCW (29,2%) were intermittent carriers. CONCLUSION: This study revealed a sustained low MRSA prevalence among samples in contact tracing of healthcare workers, over nine years. Furthermore, it shows that when MRSA contact tracing is performed according to the national guideline only 1 out 1000 samples results in a secondary case. This is similar to the population carriage rate of MRSA in The Netherlands. More frequently, an unrelated strain is found. These findings raise question marks regarding the efficacy of the current strategy to perform contact tracing after unprotected exposure. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures
format Online
Article
Text
id pubmed-7777477
institution National Center for Biotechnology Information
language English
publishDate 2020
publisher Oxford University Press
record_format MEDLINE/PubMed
spelling pubmed-77774772021-01-07 865. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prevalence among healthcare workers (HCW) in contact tracings in a Dutch teaching hospital, 2010-2018 Weterings, veronica Kievits, Heidi van Rijen, Miranda kluytmans, Jan Open Forum Infect Dis Poster Abstracts BACKGROUND: In The Netherlands, the national guidelines on MRSA prevention and control advocate screening of HCW after unprotected exposure to MRSA carriers. Although this strategy at large is successful, contact tracing of staff is a time consuming and costly component. We evaluated our contact tracing policy for HCW over the years 2010 – 2018. MRSA prevalence among samples in contact tracing [Image: see text] METHODS: A retrospective, observational study was performed in a Dutch teaching hospital. All HCW who had unprotected contact with an MRSA carrier were included in contact tracing. When there had been a long period of unprotected admission prior to an MRSA finding, or when the index case was a HCW, than the entire (nursing) team was tested. All samples of HCWs who were tested for MRSA carriage as part of contact tracing from 2010 until 2018 were included. A pooled nose, throat and perineum swab was collected using the eSwab medium (Copan) and inoculated on chromID MRSA agar plates (bioMérieux) after enrichment in a broth. RESULTS: In total, we included 8,849 samples (range: 677 – 1,448 samples per year) from a total of 287 contact tracings (range: 26 – 55 contact tracings per year). Thirty two HCWs were colonized with MRSA (0.36%; 95%CI 0.26 – 0.51). None of them developed a clinical infection. Eight HCWs (0.10%; 95%CI 0.05% – 0.19%) were colonized with the same MLVA type as the index case, and were detected in 6/287 contact tracings (2%). In 4/8 of these cases, a positive HCW was the index for undertaking contact tracing. In 3/8 cases it was clear that the HCW who was identified in the contact tracing was the source of the outbreak and was the cause of invasive MRSA infections in patients. Notably, a different MLVA type as the index case was found in 24 HCWs (0,27%; 95%CI 0,18 – 0,40) of which 7/24 HCW (29,2%) were intermittent carriers. CONCLUSION: This study revealed a sustained low MRSA prevalence among samples in contact tracing of healthcare workers, over nine years. Furthermore, it shows that when MRSA contact tracing is performed according to the national guideline only 1 out 1000 samples results in a secondary case. This is similar to the population carriage rate of MRSA in The Netherlands. More frequently, an unrelated strain is found. These findings raise question marks regarding the efficacy of the current strategy to perform contact tracing after unprotected exposure. DISCLOSURES: All Authors: No reported disclosures Oxford University Press 2020-12-31 /pmc/articles/PMC7777477/ http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1054 Text en © The Author 2020. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of Infectious Diseases Society of America. http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/ This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-NoDerivs licence (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/), which permits non-commercial reproduction and distribution of the work, in any medium, provided the original work is not altered or transformed in any way, and that the work is properly cited. For commercial re-use, please contact journals.permissions@oup.com
spellingShingle Poster Abstracts
Weterings, veronica
Kievits, Heidi
van Rijen, Miranda
kluytmans, Jan
865. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prevalence among healthcare workers (HCW) in contact tracings in a Dutch teaching hospital, 2010-2018
title 865. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prevalence among healthcare workers (HCW) in contact tracings in a Dutch teaching hospital, 2010-2018
title_full 865. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prevalence among healthcare workers (HCW) in contact tracings in a Dutch teaching hospital, 2010-2018
title_fullStr 865. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prevalence among healthcare workers (HCW) in contact tracings in a Dutch teaching hospital, 2010-2018
title_full_unstemmed 865. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prevalence among healthcare workers (HCW) in contact tracings in a Dutch teaching hospital, 2010-2018
title_short 865. Methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) prevalence among healthcare workers (HCW) in contact tracings in a Dutch teaching hospital, 2010-2018
title_sort 865. methicillin-resistant staphylococcus aureus (mrsa) prevalence among healthcare workers (hcw) in contact tracings in a dutch teaching hospital, 2010-2018
topic Poster Abstracts
url https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC7777477/
http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ofid/ofaa439.1054
work_keys_str_mv AT weteringsveronica 865methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsaprevalenceamonghealthcareworkershcwincontacttracingsinadutchteachinghospital20102018
AT kievitsheidi 865methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsaprevalenceamonghealthcareworkershcwincontacttracingsinadutchteachinghospital20102018
AT vanrijenmiranda 865methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsaprevalenceamonghealthcareworkershcwincontacttracingsinadutchteachinghospital20102018
AT kluytmansjan 865methicillinresistantstaphylococcusaureusmrsaprevalenceamonghealthcareworkershcwincontacttracingsinadutchteachinghospital20102018